Shaffer Anne, Lindhiem Oliver, Kolko David
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Prev Sci. 2017 Apr;18(3):305-311. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0689-5.
The goal of this brief report is to demonstrate the utility of quantifying parental discipline practices as relative frequencies in measuring changes in parenting behavior and relations to child behavior following intervention. We explored comparisons across methodological approaches of assessing parenting behavior via absolute and relative frequencies in measuring improvements in parent-reported disciplinary practices (increases in positive parenting practices in response to child behavior; decreases in inconsistent discipline and use of corporal punishment) and child behavior problems. The current study was conducted as part of a larger clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a collaborative care intervention for behavior problems, ADHD, and anxiety in pediatric primary care practices (Doctor Office Collaborative Care; DOCC). Participants were 321 parent-child dyads (M child age = 8.00, 65 % male children) from eight pediatric practices that were cluster randomized to DOCC or enhanced usual care (EUC). Parents reported on their own discipline behaviors and child behavior problems. While treatment-related decreases in negative parenting were found using both the absolute and relative frequencies of parenting behaviors, results were different for positive parenting behaviors, which showed decreases when measured as absolute frequencies but increases when measured as relative frequencies. In addition, positive parenting was negatively correlated with child behavior problems when using relative frequencies, but not absolute frequencies, and relative frequencies of positive parenting mediated relations between treatment condition and outcomes. Our findings indicate that the methods used to measure treatment-related change warrant careful consideration.
本简要报告的目的是证明将父母管教行为量化为相对频率在衡量干预后养育行为变化以及与儿童行为关系方面的效用。我们探讨了通过绝对频率和相对频率评估养育行为的不同方法在衡量父母报告的管教行为改善情况(对儿童行为的积极养育行为增加;不一致管教和体罚使用减少)以及儿童行为问题方面的比较。本研究是一项更大规模临床试验的一部分,该试验旨在评估儿科初级保健实践中针对行为问题、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和焦虑症的协作护理干预措施(医生办公室协作护理;DOCC)的疗效。参与者是来自8个儿科诊所的321对亲子二元组(儿童平均年龄 = 8.00岁,65%为男性儿童),这些诊所被整群随机分为DOCC组或强化常规护理(EUC)组。父母报告了他们自己的管教行为和儿童行为问题。虽然使用养育行为的绝对频率和相对频率都发现了与治疗相关的负面养育行为减少,但积极养育行为的结果有所不同,以绝对频率衡量时显示减少,以相对频率衡量时显示增加。此外,使用相对频率时积极养育与儿童行为问题呈负相关,而使用绝对频率时则不然,并且积极养育的相对频率介导了治疗条件与结果之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,用于衡量与治疗相关变化的方法值得仔细考虑。