Commentary: Greater Emotional Gain from Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving.
作者信息
Hargis Mary B, Oppenheimer Daniel M
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA, USA.
Department of Psychology and Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA, USA.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 14;7:1075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01075. eCollection 2016.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: Greater Emotional Gain from Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving.评论：老年人给予行为带来更大的情感收获：慈善捐赠中与年龄相关的积极偏差
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 14;7:1075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01075. eCollection 2016.
2
Greater Emotional Gain from Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving.老年人给予行为带来的情感收获更大：慈善捐赠中与年龄相关的积极偏见
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 15;7:846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00846. eCollection 2016.
3
Response: Commentary: Greater Emotional Gain from Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving.回应：评论：老年人给予行为带来的更多情感收获：慈善捐赠中与年龄相关的积极偏见。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 30;7:1887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01887. eCollection 2016.
4
Psychological value theory: A computational cognitive model of charitable giving.心理价值理论：慈善捐赠的一种计算认知模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Sep;145:101593. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101593. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
5
Framing charitable donations as exceptional expenses increases giving.将慈善捐赠视为特殊支出会增加捐赠。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Jun;21(2):130-9. doi: 10.1037/xap0000047. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
6
Effect of mortality salience on charitable donations: Evidence from a national sample.死亡凸显对慈善捐赠的影响：来自全国样本的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Jun;36(4):415-420. doi: 10.1037/pag0000478. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect.处理分散注意力的非面部情绪图像：没有与年龄相关的积极效应的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 13;8:591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00591. eCollection 2017.
8
No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample.没有证据表明一系列人工监测线索会影响MTurk样本中对慈善机构的在线捐赠。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Oct 19;3(10):150710. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150710. eCollection 2016 Oct.
9
On Reminder Effects, Drop-Outs and Dominance: Evidence from an Online Experiment on Charitable Giving.关于提醒效应、退出情况和主导性：来自慈善捐赠在线实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0134705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134705. eCollection 2015.
10
Semantic relatedness and distinctive processing may inflate older adults' positive memory bias.语义相关性和独特性加工可能会夸大老年人的积极记忆偏差。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1431-1443. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00943-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Response: Commentary: Greater Emotional Gain from Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving.回应：评论：老年人给予行为带来的更多情感收获：慈善捐赠中与年龄相关的积极偏见。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 30;7:1887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01887. eCollection 2016.
本文引用的文献
1
Greater Emotional Gain from Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving.老年人给予行为带来的情感收获更大：慈善捐赠中与年龄相关的积极偏见
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 15;7:846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00846. eCollection 2016.
2
Gist-based memory for prices and "better buys" in younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人基于要点的价格记忆与“更划算的交易”。
Memory. 2017 Apr;25(4):565-573. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1197944. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences for positive over negative information.年龄相关正性效应的元分析：对正性信息与负性信息的偏好随年龄差异的变化。
Psychol Aging. 2014 Mar;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0035194.
4
Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling.情绪体验随着年龄的增长而改善：基于超过 10 年经验抽样的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Mar;26(1):21-33. doi: 10.1037/a0021285.
5
Memory for grocery prices in younger and older adults: the role of schematic support.年轻人和老年人对食品杂货价格的记忆：图式支持的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2005 Dec;20(4):718-21. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.718.
6
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.成人认知年龄差异的加工速度理论。
Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):403-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403.
Zotero 插件