• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过腹腔注射和灌胃给予环磷酰胺的微核试验。

Micronucleus test with cyclophosphamide administered by intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage.

作者信息

Wakata A, Yamashita T, Tamaoki M, Ohshima T, Kojima M

机构信息

Safety Research Laboratories, Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):369-72. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90088-8.

DOI:10.1016/0165-1218(89)90088-8
PMID:2747720
Abstract

The effect of route of administration on the micronucleus test was examined in 2 laboratories: cyclophosphamide (CYP) was administered by intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) or oral gavage (p.o.) to 2 strains of mice. MS/Ae and CD-1. On the basis of a small-scale acute toxicity study and a pilot micronucleus experiment, the final micronucleus test was performed with a 48-h sampling time at doses of 25-200 mg/kg i.p. and 50-400 mg/kg p.o. CYP via the i.p. route was more toxic and induced more micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCEs) in MS/Ae mice than in CD-1 mice. Administration-route-related differences were not distinctly shown in the MS/Ae strain. In CD-1, however, higher doses were required for the p.o. route than for the i.p. route to induce about equal amounts of clastogenic damage.

摘要

在2个实验室研究了给药途径对微核试验的影响:将环磷酰胺(CYP)通过腹腔注射(i.p.)或灌胃(p.o.)给予2个品系的小鼠,即MS/Ae和CD-1。基于小规模急性毒性研究和初步微核试验,最终微核试验在48小时采样时间下进行,腹腔注射剂量为25-200mg/kg,灌胃剂量为50-400mg/kg。与灌胃途径相比,腹腔注射途径的CYP对MS/Ae小鼠毒性更大,诱导产生的微核多染红细胞(MNPCEs)更多。在MS/Ae品系中未明显显示出给药途径相关差异。然而,在CD-1品系中,灌胃途径诱导同等程度的致断裂损伤所需剂量高于腹腔注射途径。

相似文献

1
Micronucleus test with cyclophosphamide administered by intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage.通过腹腔注射和灌胃给予环磷酰胺的微核试验。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):369-72. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90088-8.
2
Micronucleus test with methyl methanesulfonate administered by intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage.腹腔注射和灌胃给予甲磺酸甲酯的微核试验。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):383-6. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90091-8.
3
Micronucleus test with 2-acetylaminofluorene by intraperitoneal injection and oral administration.通过腹腔注射和口服给予2-乙酰氨基芴进行微核试验。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):361-4. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90086-4.
4
Effect of route of administration in the micronucleus test with potassium bromate.给药途径在溴酸钾微核试验中的作用。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):399-402. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90095-5.
5
Micronucleus test with ethyl methanesulfonate administered by intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage.通过腹腔注射和灌胃给予甲磺酸乙酯的微核试验。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):373-5. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90089-x.
6
Micronucleus test with vincristine administered by intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage.通过腹腔注射和灌胃给予长春新碱的微核试验。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):395-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90094-3.
7
A comparison of intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage in the micronucleus test with mitomycin C in mice.丝裂霉素C对小鼠进行微核试验时腹腔注射与灌胃给药的比较。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):387-90. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90092-x.
8
Administration-route-related difference in the micronucleus test with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene.7,12-二甲基苯并[a]蒽微核试验中与给药途径相关的差异。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):357-60. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90085-2.
9
Administration-route-related differences in the micronucleus test with benzene.苯微核试验中与给药途径相关的差异
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):407-10. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90097-9.
10
Micronucleus test with procarbazine hydrochloride administered by intraperitoneal injection and oral gavage.盐酸丙卡巴肼腹腔注射和灌胃给药的微核试验。
Mutat Res. 1989 Aug;223(4):411-4. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90098-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyclophosphamide-induced multiple organ dysfunctions: unravelling of dose dependent toxic impact on biochemistry and histology.环磷酰胺诱导的多器官功能障碍:剂量依赖性毒性对生物化学和组织学影响的解析
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2024 Dec 17;13(6):tfae201. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfae201. eCollection 2024 Dec.