Um Taewoong, Lee Dong Hoon, Kang Joon-Won, Kim Eun Young, Yoon Young Hee
Department of Ophthalmology, 38th Fighter Group Medical Station, Gunsan, Korea .
Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei Eagle Eye Hospital, Seongnam, Korea .
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Aug;31(8):1292-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.8.1292. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
Both diabetic retinopathy (DR) and coronary heart disease (CHD) are clinically significant in diabetic patients. We investigated the correlation between the severity of DR and the presence and severity of CHD among type 2 diabetic patients. A total of 175 patients who were examined at the DR clinic and underwent dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) angiography within 6 months were included. The degree of DR was graded as no DR, nonproliferative DR (NPDR), and proliferative DR (PDR). The severity of CHD and the numbers of significant stenotic coronary artery on DSCT angiography according to DR grade were assessed. The mean Agatston Calcium Score (ACS) in patients with PDR was significantly higher than other groups (P < 0.001). The overall odds of an ACS increase were about 4.7-fold higher in PDR group than in no DR group (P < 0.001). In PDR group, in comparison with in no DR, the odds of having 1 or 2 arterial involvement were 3-fold higher (P = 0.044), and those of having 3 were 17-fold higher (P = 0.011). The c-index, one of the predictability values in regression analysis model, was not significantly increased when PDR was added to classical CHD risk factors (0.671 to 0.706, P = 0.111). Conclusively, patients with PDR develop a greater likelihood of not only having CHD, but being more severe nature. PDR has no additional effect to classical CHD risk factors for predicting CHD.
糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和冠心病(CHD)在糖尿病患者中均具有临床意义。我们研究了2型糖尿病患者中DR的严重程度与CHD的存在及严重程度之间的相关性。纳入了总共175例在DR门诊接受检查并在6个月内接受双源计算机断层扫描(DSCT)血管造影的患者。DR的程度分为无DR、非增殖性DR(NPDR)和增殖性DR(PDR)。根据DR分级评估CHD的严重程度以及DSCT血管造影上显著狭窄冠状动脉的数量。PDR患者的平均阿加斯顿钙评分(ACS)显著高于其他组(P < 0.001)。PDR组ACS升高的总体几率比无DR组高约4.7倍(P < 0.001)。在PDR组中,与无DR组相比,有1处或2处动脉受累的几率高3倍(P = 0.044),有3处动脉受累的几率高17倍(P = 0.011)。在回归分析模型中,当将PDR添加到经典CHD危险因素中时,可预测性值之一的c指数没有显著增加(从0.671增至0.706,P = 0.111)。总之,PDR患者不仅患CHD的可能性更大,而且病情更严重。对于预测CHD,PDR对经典CHD危险因素没有额外影响。