Bays Brett C, Turk-Browne Nicholas B, Seitz Aaron R
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Vis cogn. 2016;23(9-10):1072-1097. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1139647. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
Statistical learning refers to the extraction of probabilistic relationships between stimuli and is increasingly used as a method to understand learning processes. However, numerous cognitive processes are sensitive to the statistical relationships between stimuli and any one measure of learning may conflate these processes; to date little research has focused on differentiating these processes. To understand how multiple processes underlie statistical learning, here we compared, within the same study, operational measures of learning from different tasks that may be differentially sensitive to these processes. In Experiment 1, participants were visually exposed to temporal regularities embedded in a stream of shapes. Their task was to periodically detect whether a shape, whose contrast was staircased to a threshold level, was present or absent. Afterwards, they completed a search task, where statistically predictable shapes were found more quickly. We used the search task to label shape pairs as "learned" or "non-learned", and then used these labels to analyse the detection task. We found a dissociation between learning on the search task and the detection task where only non-learned pairs showed learning effects in the detection task. This finding was replicated in further experiments with recognition memory (Experiment 2) and associative learning tasks (Experiment 3). Taken together, these findings are consistent with the view that statistical learning may comprise a family of processes that can produce dissociable effects on different aspects of behaviour.
统计学习是指提取刺激之间的概率关系,并且越来越多地被用作理解学习过程的一种方法。然而,许多认知过程对刺激之间的统计关系敏感,而且任何一种学习测量方法都可能使这些过程相互混淆;迄今为止,很少有研究专注于区分这些过程。为了理解多个过程如何构成统计学习的基础,我们在同一研究中比较了来自不同任务的学习操作指标,这些任务可能对这些过程有不同的敏感性。在实验1中,参与者视觉上接触嵌入在一系列形状中的时间规律。他们的任务是定期检测一个对比度逐步调整到阈值水平的形状是否存在。之后,他们完成了一个搜索任务,在这个任务中,统计上可预测的形状被更快地找到。我们使用搜索任务将形状对标记为“已学习”或“未学习”,然后使用这些标签来分析检测任务。我们发现在搜索任务和检测任务的学习之间存在分离,其中只有未学习的形状对在检测任务中显示出学习效果。这一发现在用识别记忆(实验2)和联想学习任务(实验3)进行的进一步实验中得到了重复。综上所述,这些发现与以下观点一致,即统计学习可能包含一系列能够对行为的不同方面产生可分离效应的过程。