Cancer Society of New Zealand Social & Behavioural Research Unit, Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, University of Otago School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Mar 10;3:257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.001. eCollection 2016 Jun.
Guided by the established primary school SunSmart programme, a survey of secondary schools' sun protection policies, planning, behavioural expectations, curriculum content and environment was undertaken in order to establish a baseline to inform advocacy and secondary level programme development.
All 448 principals of state or state integrated public secondary schools identified from the Ministry of Education database were mailed a hard copy questionnaire. School sun protection practices were assessed and a summative, non-weighted, 11-item Total Sun Protection Score (TSPS) was created. Associations between TSPS and socio-demographic factors, as well as school sun protection policy, were investigated using unadjusted and multiple linear regressions.
Usable responses received from 211 of the 448 schools (47% participation) indicated reasonable representativeness of eligible schools, but under-representation of low socioeconomic decile institutions (p = 0.003) and those with the smallest roll size (p = 0.004). Only 50% of schools reported having a sun protection policy. The least attained TSPS components were outdoor event planning (17.1%), student breaks (16.6%), sun-protective clothing (8.5%) and shade provision (6.2%). The mean (SD) TSPS was 4.58 (2.06). In multivariable analysis, TSPS was statistically significantly positively associated with having a sun protection policy (p < 0.001) and the presence of primary level classes (p < 0.001) - the latter suggesting a possible influence of programme continuity, but negatively associated with integrated school status (p = 0.036).
A standard SunSmart programme could be promoted to all schools, irrespective of socioeconomic decile, overall roll size, gender status or regional population density. Low attainment of some TSPS components indicates targeting priorities.
在已确立的小学“阳光安全”计划的指导下,对中学的防晒政策、规划、行为预期、课程内容和环境进行了调查,以便为宣传和中学项目的发展提供基准。
从教育部数据库中确定的 448 所州立或州立综合公立中学的所有校长都收到了一份纸质问卷。评估了学校的防晒措施,并创建了一个总结性的、非加权的、11 项的总防晒评分(TSPS)。使用未调整和多元线性回归分析了 TSPS 与社会人口因素以及学校防晒政策之间的关联。
从 448 所学校中收到了 211 份可用的回复(47%的参与率),这表明合格学校具有相当的代表性,但代表了低收入社会经济阶层机构的代表性不足(p=0.003)和规模最小的学校(p=0.004)。只有 50%的学校报告有防晒政策。TSPS 得分最低的部分是户外活动规划(17.1%)、学生休息(16.6%)、防晒服装(8.5%)和遮阳设施(6.2%)。平均(SD)TSPS 为 4.58(2.06)。在多变量分析中,TSPS 与有防晒政策(p<0.001)和有小学阶段课程(p<0.001)呈统计学显著正相关,后者可能表明计划连续性的影响,但与综合学校地位呈负相关(p=0.036)。
可以向所有学校推广标准的“阳光安全”计划,而不论社会经济阶层、总体招生规模、性别地位或区域人口密度如何。一些 TSPS 得分较低的部分表明需要确定重点。