• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语法结构会加速数字词的学习吗?来自斯洛文尼亚双重和非双重方言学习者的证据。

Does Grammatical Structure Accelerate Number Word Learning? Evidence from Learners of Dual and Non-Dual Dialects of Slovenian.

作者信息

Marušič Franc, Žaucer Rok, Plesničar Vesna, Razboršek Tina, Sullivan Jessica, Barner David

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Science of Language, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia.

Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0159208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159208. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0159208
PMID:27486802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4972304/
Abstract

How does linguistic structure affect children's acquisition of early number word meanings? Previous studies have tested this question by comparing how children learning languages with different grammatical representations of number learn the meanings of labels for small numbers, like 1, 2, and 3. For example, children who acquire a language with singular-plural marking, like English, are faster to learn the word for 1 than children learning a language that lacks the singular-plural distinction, perhaps because the word for 1 is always used in singular contexts, highlighting its meaning. These studies are problematic, however, because reported differences in number word learning may be due to unmeasured cross-cultural differences rather than specific linguistic differences. To address this problem, we investigated number word learning in four groups of children from a single culture who spoke different dialects of the same language that differed chiefly with respect to how they grammatically mark number. We found that learning a dialect which features "dual" morphology (marking of pairs) accelerated children's acquisition of the number word two relative to learning a "non-dual" dialect of the same language.

摘要

语言结构如何影响儿童对早期数字单词含义的习得?以往的研究通过比较学习具有不同数字语法表征的语言的儿童如何学习小数目的标签(如1、2和3)的含义来检验这个问题。例如,习得具有单复数标记的语言(如英语)的儿童比学习缺乏单复数区分的语言的儿童更快学会表示1的单词,这可能是因为表示1的单词总是用于单数语境,突出了它的含义。然而,这些研究存在问题,因为报告的数字单词学习差异可能是由于未测量的跨文化差异而非特定的语言差异所致。为了解决这个问题,我们调查了来自单一文化的四组儿童的数字单词学习情况,这些儿童说同一种语言的不同方言,主要区别在于它们在语法上标记数字的方式。我们发现,相对于学习同一种语言的“非双数”方言,学习具有“双数”形态(对的标记)的方言加速了儿童对数字单词“二”的习得。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/e9275150aadd/pone.0159208.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/38dbf2f768e5/pone.0159208.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/bc06f8de4c20/pone.0159208.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/f9663b709842/pone.0159208.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/e9275150aadd/pone.0159208.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/38dbf2f768e5/pone.0159208.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/bc06f8de4c20/pone.0159208.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/f9663b709842/pone.0159208.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b27/4972304/e9275150aadd/pone.0159208.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Grammatical Structure Accelerate Number Word Learning? Evidence from Learners of Dual and Non-Dual Dialects of Slovenian.语法结构会加速数字词的学习吗?来自斯洛文尼亚双重和非双重方言学习者的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0159208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159208. eCollection 2016.
2
Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings.语法形态作为早期数字词意义的来源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 12;110(46):18448-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313652110. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
3
Numerical morphology supports early number word learning: Evidence from a comparison of young Mandarin and English learners.数字形态学支持早期数字词学习:来自普通话和英语学习者比较的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Aug;88:162-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
4
From grammatical number to exact numbers: early meanings of 'one', 'two', and 'three' in English, Russian, and Japanese.从语法数词到精确数字:英语、俄语和日语中“一”“二”“三”的早期含义。
Cogn Psychol. 2007 Sep;55(2):136-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
5
Finding one's meaning: a test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development.寻找意义:语言发展中量词与整数关系的一项测试。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):195-219. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
6
On the relation between grammatical number and cardinal numbers in development.论发展过程中语法数和基数的关系。
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 9;5:1132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01132. eCollection 2014.
7
Do children derive exact meanings pragmatically? Evidence from a dual morphology language.儿童是否能从语用学上准确理解词义?来自双词素语言的证据。
Cognition. 2021 Feb;207:104527. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104527. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
A cross-linguistic study of real-word and non-word repetition as predictors of grammatical competence in children with typical language development.跨语言研究真实单词和非单词重复对典型语言发育儿童语法能力的预测作用。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Sep-Oct;46(5):564-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00008.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
9
Linguistic constraints on children's overt marking of BE by dialect and age.儿童通过方言和年龄对 BE 的显性标记的语言限制。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Jun;56(3):933-44. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0099). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
10
A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence.早期词义的跨语言研究:普遍本体论与语言影响
Cognition. 1997 Feb;62(2):169-200. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00784-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing Mr. Three: Attention, Perception, and Meaning Selection in the Acquisition of Number and Color Words.介绍“三号先生”:数字与颜色词汇习得中的注意力、感知与意义选择
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Sep 15;8:1129-1152. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00163. eCollection 2024.
2
Verbal counting and the timing of number acquisition in an indigenous Amazonian group.口头数数与一个本土亚马逊族群中数字获取的时间。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 1;17(8):e0270739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270739. eCollection 2022.
3
One-to-one correspondence without language.无需语言的一一对应。

本文引用的文献

1
Language, procedures, and the non-perceptual origin of number word meanings.语言、程序与数词意义的非感知起源
J Child Lang. 2017 May;44(3):553-590. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000058. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
2
Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings.语法形态作为早期数字词意义的来源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 12;110(46):18448-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313652110. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
3
Learning that classifiers count: Mandarin-speaking children's acquisition of sortal and mensural classifiers.了解量词的重要性:说普通话儿童对类别量词和度量量词的习得
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Oct 30;6(10):190495. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190495. eCollection 2019 Oct.
J East Asian Ling. 2010 Nov;19(3):207-230. doi: 10.1007/s10831-010-9060-1.
4
Does learning to count involve a semantic induction?学习数数是否涉及语义归纳?
Cognition. 2012 Apr;123(1):162-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
5
Quantity recognition among speakers of an anumeric language.无数字语言使用者的数量识别。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):130-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01209.x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
6
Cross-linguistic relations between quantifiers and numerals in language acquisition: evidence from Japanese.语言习得中量词与数词的跨语言关系:来自日语的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Aug;103(4):421-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
7
Finding one's meaning: a test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development.寻找意义:语言发展中量词与整数关系的一项测试。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):195-219. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
8
Number as a cognitive technology: evidence from Pirahã language and cognition.数字作为一种认知技术:来自毗拉哈语和认知的证据。
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):819-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
9
From grammatical number to exact numbers: early meanings of 'one', 'two', and 'three' in English, Russian, and Japanese.从语法数词到精确数字:英语、俄语和日语中“一”“二”“三”的早期含义。
Cogn Psychol. 2007 Sep;55(2):136-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
10
On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays.论婴儿对小物体阵列数量量化的局限性。
Cognition. 2005 Oct;97(3):295-313. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.010. Epub 2004 Dec 30.