• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利的KiVa反欺凌项目:随机对照试验中的有效性证据。

KiVa Anti-Bullying Program in Italy: Evidence of Effectiveness in a Randomized Control Trial.

作者信息

Nocentini Annalaura, Menesini Ersilia

机构信息

Department of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi, 12, Complesso di San Salvi Padiglione 26, 50135, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2016 Nov;17(8):1012-1023. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0690-z.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-016-0690-z
PMID:27488457
Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the KiVa anti-bullying program in Italy through a randomized control trial of students in grades 4 and 6. The sample involved 2042 students (51 % female; grade 4, mean age = 8.85; ds = 0.43; grade 6, mean age = 10.93; ds = 0.50); 13 comprehensive schools were randomly assigned into intervention (KiVa) or control (usual school provision) conditions. Different outcomes (bullying, victimization, pro-bullying attitudes, pro-victim attitudes, empathy toward victims), analyses (longitudinal mixed model with multiple-item scales; longitudinal prevalence of bullies and victims using Olweus' single question), and estimates of effectiveness (Cohen's d; odds ratios) were considered in order to compare the Italian results with those from other countries. Multilevel models showed that KiVa reduced bullying and victimization and increased pro-victim attitudes and empathy toward the victim in grade 4, with effect sizes from 0.24 to 0.40. In grade 6, KiVa reduced bullying, victimization, and pro-bullying attitudes; the effects were smaller as compared to grade 4, yet significant (d ≥ 0.20). Finally, using Olweus dichotomous definition of bullies and victims, results showed that the odds of being a victim were 1.93 times higher for a control student than for a KiVa student in grade 4. Overall, the findings provide evidence of the effectiveness of the program in Italy; the discussion will focus on factors that influenced successfully the transportability of the KiVa program in Italy.

摘要

本研究旨在通过对四年级和六年级学生进行随机对照试验,评估KiVa反欺凌项目在意大利的有效性。样本包括2042名学生(51%为女生;四年级,平均年龄=8.85;标准差=0.43;六年级,平均年龄=10.93;标准差=0.50);13所综合学校被随机分配到干预组(KiVa)或对照组(常规学校设置)。为了将意大利的结果与其他国家的结果进行比较,考虑了不同的结果(欺凌、受欺负、支持欺凌的态度、支持受害者的态度、对受害者的同理心)、分析方法(使用多项目量表的纵向混合模型;使用奥维斯单问题的欺凌者和受害者的纵向患病率)以及有效性估计(科恩d值;优势比)。多层次模型显示,KiVa减少了四年级的欺凌和受欺负现象,并增加了支持受害者的态度和对受害者的同理心,效应大小为0.24至0.40。在六年级,KiVa减少了欺凌、受欺负和支持欺凌的态度;与四年级相比,效果较小,但仍具有显著性(d≥0.20)。最后,使用奥维斯对欺凌者和受害者的二分法定义,结果显示,在四年级,对照组学生成为受害者的几率比KiVa组学生高1.93倍。总体而言,研究结果提供了该项目在意大利有效的证据;讨论将集中在成功影响KiVa项目在意大利可移植性的因素上。

相似文献

1
KiVa Anti-Bullying Program in Italy: Evidence of Effectiveness in a Randomized Control Trial.意大利的KiVa反欺凌项目:随机对照试验中的有效性证据。
Prev Sci. 2016 Nov;17(8):1012-1023. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0690-z.
2
The KiVa antibullying program in primary schools in Chile, with and without the digital game component: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.智利小学的KiVa反欺凌项目,有无数字游戏组件:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 20;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1810-1.
3
A Large-Scale Replication of the Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program: a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands.基瓦反欺凌项目有效性的大规模复制:荷兰的一项随机对照试验
Prev Sci. 2020 Jul;21(5):627-638. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01116-4.
4
Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1-9.走向规模化:KiVa 反欺凌计划在 1-9 年级的全国非随机试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Dec;79(6):796-805. doi: 10.1037/a0025740. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
5
Effectiveness of the KiVa anti-bullying program in the Czech Republic: A cluster randomized control trial.KiVa 反欺凌计划在捷克共和国的有效性:一项群组随机对照试验。
Eval Program Plann. 2024 Oct;106:102459. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102459. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
6
Teacher factors contributing to dosage of the KiVa anti-bullying program.导致 KiVa 反欺凌项目剂量变化的教师因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Dec;65:102-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
7
The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools.英国团结试验:一项多中心集群随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估 KiVa 在减少小学欺凌方面的有效性和成本效益。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12642-x.
8
The Effectiveness of the KiVa Bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.英国威尔士KiVa欺凌预防项目的有效性:一项实用整群随机对照试验的结果
Prev Sci. 2020 Jul;21(5):615-626. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9.
9
Can a school-wide bullying prevention program improve the plight of victims? Evidence for risk × intervention effects.校园欺凌预防计划能否改善受害者的困境?风险×干预效果的证据。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Apr;84(4):334-44. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000078. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A large scale study of U.S. students in grades 3-11.Olweus 欺凌预防计划评估:对美国 3-11 年级学生的大规模研究。
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Aug;69:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Causes of bullying among young people and protective mechanisms and preventative factors that promote mental health and well-being: young people's perspectives.年轻人之间欺凌行为的成因以及促进心理健康和幸福的保护机制与预防因素:年轻人的观点
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2524459. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2524459. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Cyberbullying Perpetration and Socio-Behavioral Correlates in Italian and Spanish Preadolescents: A Cross-National Study and Serial Mediation Analysis.意大利和西班牙青春期前儿童的网络欺凌行为及其社会行为关联:一项跨国研究与系列中介分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;22(3):389. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030389.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! program in two independent trials.基于证据的反欺凌和网络欺凌干预措施:对NoTrap! 项目在两项独立试验中的评估。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):194-206. doi: 10.1002/ab.21636.
2
Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation.预防科学中疗效、有效性及扩大研究的证据标准:下一代标准。
Prev Sci. 2015 Oct;16(7):893-926. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x.
3
Reducing bullying and victimization: student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change.
The youth mental health crisis: analysis and solutions.
青少年心理健康危机:分析与解决方案。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 21;15:1517533. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1517533. eCollection 2024.
4
The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial.英国小学反欺凌项目(KiVa)的效果与成本:一项多中心整群随机对照试验
Psychol Med. 2024 Nov 12;54(15):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002666.
5
Understanding the situation of bystanders to inform anti-bullying interventions.了解旁观者的情况以指导反欺凌干预措施。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1116860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1116860. eCollection 2024.
6
Does competitive school climate really harm to students' anti-bullying attitude: empirical evidence from China.竞争激烈的学校氛围真的会损害学生的反欺凌态度吗:来自中国的实证证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):2927. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20444-6.
7
KiVa anti-bullying program: preventing bullying and reducing Bulling Behavior among students - a scoping review.KiVa 反霸凌计划:预防和减少学生中的霸凌行为——系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):2923. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20086-8.
8
A web-enabled, school-based intervention for bullying prevention (LINKlusive): a cluster randomised trial.一项基于网络的、以学校为基础的预防欺凌干预措施(包容链接):一项整群随机试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jan 26;68:102427. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102427. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
A Scoping Review of Anti-Bullying Interventions: Reducing Traumatic Effect of Bullying Among Adolescents.一项关于反欺凌干预措施的范围综述:减少欺凌对青少年的创伤影响。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jan 20;17:289-304. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S443841. eCollection 2024.
10
Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.基于学校的减少欺凌行为实施和受欺凌情况的项目的有效性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 5;17(2):e1143. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1143. eCollection 2021 Jun.
减少欺凌与受欺负现象:学生及班级层面的改变机制
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):61-76. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9841-x.
4
Level and change of bullying behavior during high school: a multilevel growth curve analysis.高中阶段欺凌行为的水平和变化:多层次增长曲线分析。
J Adolesc. 2013 Jun;36(3):495-505. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
5
Going Global: A Model for Evaluating Empirically Supported Family-Based Interventions in New Contexts.走向全球:一种评估在新环境中得到实证支持的家庭干预措施的模式。
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Jun;37(2):203-30. doi: 10.1177/0163278712469813. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
6
Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1-9.走向规模化:KiVa 反欺凌计划在 1-9 年级的全国非随机试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Dec;79(6):796-805. doi: 10.1037/a0025740. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
7
Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on adolescents' depression, anxiety, and perception of peers.KiVa 反欺凌计划对青少年抑郁、焦虑和同伴认知的影响。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Feb;40(2):289-300. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1.
8
A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4-6.KiVa 反欺凌计划的大规模评估:4-6 年级。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):311-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x.
9
Bully prevention in positive behavior support.正向行为支持中的欺凌预防。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Winter;42(4):747-59. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-747.
10
Issues and challenges in the design of culturally adapted evidence-based interventions.文化适应性循证干预措施设计中的问题和挑战。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:213-39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-033109-132032.