Huitsing Gijs, Lodder Gerine M A, Browne Wiliam J, Oldenburg Beau, Van der Ploeg Rozemarijn, Veenstra René
Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, and Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Prev Sci. 2020 Jul;21(5):627-638. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01116-4.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program in the Netherlands through a randomized controlled trial of students in grades 3-4 (Dutch grades 5-6). The sample involved 98 schools who volunteered to participate in the research, with 245 classes and 4383 students at the baseline (49% girls; M age = 8.7 years), who participated in five measurement waves, collected in three consecutive school years. After the baseline, two-thirds of the schools were assigned to the intervention condition (KiVa or KiVa+, the latter included an additional intervention component of network feedback to teachers) and one-third to the control condition (waiting list, care as usual) with a stratified randomization procedure. The effects of the intervention on self-reported victimization and bullying were tested using cross-classified ordered multinomial models and binomial logistic regression models. These longitudinal models showed that self-reported victimization and bullying reduced more strongly in KiVa-schools compared with control schools, with stronger effects after two school years than after one school year of implementation. The results showed that for students in control schools, the odds of being a victim were 1.29-1.63 higher, and the odds of being a bully were 1.19-1.66 higher than for KiVa students. No significant differences between KiVa and KiVa+ emerged. Overall, the findings provide evidence of the effectiveness of the KiVa program in the Netherlands.
本研究通过对三至四年级(荷兰的五至六年级)学生进行随机对照试验,评估了荷兰KiVa反欺凌项目的有效性。样本包括98所自愿参与研究的学校,基线时共有245个班级和4383名学生(49%为女生;平均年龄 = 8.7岁),他们参与了在连续三个学年收集的五次测量。基线之后,三分之二的学校被分配到干预组(KiVa或KiVa+,后者包括向教师提供网络反馈的额外干预部分),三分之一的学校被分配到对照组(等待名单,照常护理),采用分层随机化程序。使用交叉分类有序多项模型和二项逻辑回归模型测试了干预对自我报告的受欺凌和欺凌行为的影响。这些纵向模型表明,与对照学校相比,KiVa学校中自我报告的受欺凌和欺凌行为减少得更明显,实施两个学年后的效果比实施一个学年后的效果更强。结果显示,对于对照学校的学生,成为受害者的几率比KiVa学生高1.29至1.63倍,成为欺凌者的几率比KiVa学生高1.19至1.66倍。KiVa和KiVa+之间没有出现显著差异。总体而言,研究结果为荷兰KiVa项目的有效性提供了证据。