Zheng Tingting, Qu Weina, Zhang Kan, Ge Yan
Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Nov;96:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.034. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
As implicit cognitive processes garner more and more importance, studies in the fields of healthy psychology and organizational safety research have focused on attentional bias, a kind of selective allocation of attentional resources in the early stage of cognitive processing. However, few studies have explored the role of attentional bias on driving behavior. This study assessed drivers' attentional bias towards safety-related words (ABS) using the dot-probe paradigm and self-reported daily driving behaviors. The results revealed significant negative correlations between attentional bias scores and several indicators of dangerous driving. Drivers with fewer dangerous driving behaviors showed greater ABS. We also built a significant linear regression model between ABS and the total DDDI score, as well as ABS and the number of accidents. Finally, we discussed the possible mechanism underlying these associations and several limitations of our study. This study opens up a new topic for the exploration of implicit processes in driving safety research.
随着内隐认知过程变得越来越重要,健康心理学和组织安全研究领域的研究聚焦于注意偏向,这是一种在认知加工早期对注意资源的选择性分配。然而,很少有研究探讨注意偏向在驾驶行为中的作用。本研究使用点探测范式和自我报告的日常驾驶行为来评估驾驶员对安全相关词汇的注意偏向(ABS)。结果显示,注意偏向分数与几种危险驾驶指标之间存在显著的负相关。危险驾驶行为较少的驾驶员表现出更大的ABS。我们还建立了ABS与总DDDI分数以及ABS与事故数量之间的显著线性回归模型。最后,我们讨论了这些关联背后可能的机制以及本研究的几个局限性。本研究为驾驶安全研究中内隐过程的探索开辟了一个新课题。