Hong Jun Sung, Lee Jungup, Espelage Dorothy L, Hunter Simon C, Patton Desmond Upton, Rivers Tyrone
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
Violence Vict. 2016;31(4):638-63. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00014.
Using a national sample of 7,533 U.S. adolescents in grades 6-10, this study compares the social-ecological correlates of face-to-face and cyberbullying victimization. Results indicate that younger age, male sex, hours spent on social media, family socioeconomic status (SES; individual context), parental monitoring (family context), positive feelings about school, and perceived peer support in school (school context) were negatively associated with both forms of victimization. European American race, Hispanic/Latino race (individual), and family satisfaction (family context) were all significantly associated with less face-to-face victimization only, and school pressure (school context) was significantly associated with more face-to-face bullying. Peer groups accepted by parents (family context) were related to less cyberbullying victimization, and calling/texting friends were related to more cyberbullying victimization. Research and practice implications are discussed.
本研究以7533名6至10年级的美国青少年为全国样本,比较了面对面欺凌和网络欺凌受害情况的社会生态相关因素。结果表明,年龄较小、男性、在社交媒体上花费的时间、家庭社会经济地位(SES;个人背景)、父母监督(家庭背景)、对学校的积极感受以及在学校中感受到的同伴支持(学校背景)与这两种形式的受害情况均呈负相关。欧裔美国人种族、西班牙裔/拉丁裔种族(个人)以及家庭满意度(家庭背景)仅与较少的面对面受害情况显著相关,而学校压力(学校背景)与更多的面对面欺凌显著相关。父母认可的同伴群体(家庭背景)与较少的网络欺凌受害情况相关,而给朋友打电话/发短信则与更多的网络欺凌受害情况相关。文中讨论了研究和实践意义。