Orłowska Renata, Machczyńska Joanna, Oleszczuk Sylwia, Zimny Janusz, Bednarek Piotr Tomasz
Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-National Research Institute, Radzików, 05-870 Błonie, Poland.
Department of Plant Biotechnology and Cytogenetics, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-National Research Institute, Radzików, 05-870 Błonie, Poland.
J Biol Res (Thessalon). 2016 Aug 8;23:19. doi: 10.1186/s40709-016-0056-5. eCollection 2016 Dec.
In vitro plant regeneration via androgenesis or somatic embryogenesis is capable of inducing (epi)mutations that may affect sexual progenies. While epimutations are associated with DNA methylation, mutations could be due to the movement of transposons. The common notion is that both processes are linked. It is being assumed that demethylation activates transposable elements (TEs). Analysis of methylation changes and their relation with TEs activation in tissue cultures requires uniquely derived donor plants (Ds), their regenerants (Rs) and respective progeny (Ps) that would allow discrimination of processes not related to changes introduced via in vitro cultures. Moreover, a set of methods (RP-HPLC, SSAP, and MSTD) is needed to study whether different TEs families are being activated during in vitro tissue culture plant regeneration and whether their activity could be linked to DNA methylation changes or alternative explanations should be considered.
The in vitro tissue culture plant regeneration in barley was responsible for the induction of DNA methylation in regenerants and conservation of the methylation level in the progeny as shown by the RP-HPLC approach. No difference between andro- and embryo-derived Rs and Ps was observed. The SSAP and MSTD approach revealed that Ds and Rs were more polymorphic than Ps. Moreover, Rs individuals exhibited more polymorphisms with the MSTD than SSAP approach. The differences between Ds, Rs and Ps were also evaluated via ANOVA and AMOVA.
Stressful conditions during plant regeneration via in vitro tissue cultures affect regenerants and their sexual progeny leading to an increase in global DNA methylation of Rs and Ps compared to Ds in barley. The increased methylation level noted among regenerants remains unchanged in the Ps as indicated via RP-HPLC data. Marker-based experiments suggest that TEs are activated via in vitro tissue cultures and that, independently of the increased methylation, their activity in Rs is greater than in Ps. Thus, the increased methylation level may not correspond to the stabilization of TEs movement at least at the level of regenerants. The presence of TEs variation among Ds that were genetically and epigenetically uniform may suggest that at least some mobile elements may be active, and they may mask variation related to tissue cultures. Thus, tissue cultures may activate some TEs whereas the others remain intact, or their level of movement is changed. Finally, we suggest that sexual reproduction may be responsible for the stabilization of TEs.
通过雄核发育或体细胞胚胎发生进行的体外植物再生能够诱导(表观)突变,这些突变可能会影响有性后代。虽然表观突变与DNA甲基化有关,但突变可能是由于转座子的移动。普遍的观点是这两个过程是相关联的。人们认为去甲基化会激活转座元件(TEs)。分析组织培养中甲基化变化及其与TEs激活的关系需要独特来源的供体植物(Ds)、其再生植株(Rs)和各自的后代(Ps),这将有助于区分与体外培养引入的变化无关的过程。此外,需要一套方法(RP-HPLC、SSAP和MSTD)来研究在体外组织培养植物再生过程中不同的TEs家族是否被激活,以及它们的活性是否与DNA甲基化变化有关,或者是否应该考虑其他解释。
RP-HPLC方法显示,大麦的体外组织培养植物再生导致再生植株中DNA甲基化的诱导以及后代中甲基化水平的保守。未观察到来自雄核发育和胚性的Rs和Ps之间的差异。SSAP和MSTD方法表明,Ds和Rs比Ps具有更多的多态性。此外,Rs个体在MSTD方法中比在SSAP方法中表现出更多的多态性。还通过方差分析(ANOVA)和分子变异分析(AMOVA)评估了Ds、Rs和Ps之间的差异。
通过体外组织培养进行植物再生过程中的应激条件会影响再生植株及其有性后代,导致与大麦中的Ds相比,Rs和Ps的整体DNA甲基化增加。如RP-HPLC数据所示,再生植株中观察到的甲基化水平增加在Ps中保持不变。基于标记的实验表明,TEs通过体外组织培养被激活,并且独立于增加的甲基化,它们在Rs中的活性大于在Ps中的活性。因此,至少在再生植株水平上,增加的甲基化水平可能与TEs移动的稳定不对应。在遗传和表观遗传上均一的Ds中存在TEs变异,这可能表明至少一些移动元件可能是活跃的,并且它们可能掩盖与组织培养相关的变异。因此,组织培养可能会激活一些TEs,而其他TEs保持完整,或者它们的移动水平发生了变化。最后,我们认为有性繁殖可能是TEs稳定的原因。