School of Public Health, The University of Queensland,Herston,Queensland,Australia.
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), University of New South Wales,Randwick,New South Wales,Australia.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Oct;26(5):545-564. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000469. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
School-based psychological interventions encompass: universal interventions targeting youth in the general population; and indicated interventions targeting youth with subthreshold depression. This study aimed to: (1) examine the population cost-effectiveness of delivering universal and indicated prevention interventions to youth in the population aged 11-17 years via primary and secondary schools in Australia; and (2) compare the comparative cost-effectiveness of delivering these interventions using face-to-face and internet-based delivery mechanisms.
We reviewed literature on the prevention of depression to identify all interventions targeting youth that would be suitable for implementation in Australia and had evidence of efficacy to support analysis. From this, we found evidence of effectiveness for the following intervention types: universal prevention involving group-based psychological interventions delivered to all participating school students; and indicated prevention involving group-based psychological interventions delivered to students with subthreshold depression. We constructed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of delivering universal and indicated interventions in the population relative to a 'no intervention' comparator over a 10-year time horizon. A disease model was used to simulate epidemiological transitions between three health states (i.e., healthy, diseased and dead). Intervention effect sizes were based on meta-analyses of randomised control trial data identified in the aforementioned review; while health benefits were measured as Disability-adjusted Life Years (DALYs) averted attributable to reductions in depression incidence. Net costs of delivering interventions were calculated using relevant Australian data. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses were conducted to test model assumptions. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured in 2013 Australian dollars per DALY averted; with costs and benefits discounted at 3%.
Universal and indicated psychological interventions delivered through face-to-face modalities had ICERs below a threshold of $50 000 per DALY averted. That is, $7350 per DALY averted (95% uncertainty interval (UI): dominates - 23 070) for universal prevention, and $19 550 per DALY averted (95% UI: 3081-56 713) for indicated prevention. Baseline ICERs were generally robust to changes in model assumptions. We conducted a sensitivity analysis which found that internet-delivered prevention interventions were highly cost-effective when assuming intervention effect sizes of 100 and 50% relative to effect sizes observed for face-to-face delivered interventions. These results should, however, be interpreted with caution due to the paucity of data.
School-based psychological interventions appear to be cost-effective. However, realising efficiency gains in the population is ultimately dependent on ensuring successful system-level implementation.
学校为基础的心理干预包括:针对普通人群中青少年的普遍干预;以及针对有亚临床抑郁的青少年的有针对性的干预。本研究旨在:(1)通过澳大利亚中小学,评估向 11-17 岁人群提供普遍和有针对性的预防干预措施的人群成本效益;(2)比较通过面对面和基于互联网的方式提供这些干预措施的比较成本效益。
我们回顾了预防抑郁症的文献,以确定所有针对澳大利亚青少年的、适合实施且有疗效证据支持分析的干预措施。从这些研究中,我们发现了以下干预类型的有效性证据:普遍预防,涉及向所有参与学校的学生提供基于小组的心理干预;以及有针对性的预防,涉及向有亚临床抑郁的学生提供基于小组的心理干预。我们构建了一个马尔可夫模型,以评估在 10 年时间内,向人群提供普遍和有针对性的干预措施相对于“无干预”对照的成本效益。使用疾病模型来模拟三种健康状态(即健康、患病和死亡)之间的流行病学转变。干预效果大小基于上述综述中随机对照试验数据的荟萃分析;而健康效益则以残疾调整生命年(DALY)衡量,归因于减少抑郁症发病率。通过使用相关的澳大利亚数据,计算了提供干预措施的净成本。使用不确定性和敏感性分析来检验模型假设。增量成本效益比(ICER)以 2013 年澳元为单位衡量,每节省一个 DALY 的成本效益;成本和效益贴现率为 3%。
通过面对面方式提供的普遍和有针对性的心理干预措施的 ICER 低于每节省一个 DALY 50000 澳元的阈值。也就是说,普遍预防的每节省一个 DALY 的成本效益为 7350 澳元(95%不确定区间(UI):占主导地位-23070),有针对性预防的每节省一个 DALY 的成本效益为 19550 澳元(95%UI:3081-56713)。基本 ICER 对模型假设的变化基本稳健。我们进行了一项敏感性分析,发现当假设干预效果大小相对于面对面干预观察到的效果大小为 100%和 50%时,基于互联网的预防干预措施具有高度成本效益。然而,由于数据的缺乏,这些结果应谨慎解释。
学校为基础的心理干预措施似乎具有成本效益。然而,要在人群中实现效率提高,最终取决于确保系统层面的成功实施。