Hutchison Paul J, McLaughlin Katie, Corbridge Tom, Michelson Kelly N, Emanuel Linda, Sporn Peter H S, Crowley-Matoka Megan
1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL.2Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.4Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.5Buehler Center on Aging, Health & Society, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.6Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.7Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):2208-2214. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001957.
In the ICU, discussions between clinicians and surrogate decision makers are often accompanied by conflict about a patient's prognosis or care plan. Trust plays a role in limiting conflict, but little is known about the determinants of trust in the ICU. We sought to identify the dimensions of trust and clinician behaviors conducive to trust formation in the ICU.
Prospective qualitative study.
Medical ICU of a major urban university hospital.
Surrogate decision makers of intubated, mechanically ventilated patients in the medical ICU.
Semistructured interviews focused on surrogates' general experiences in the ICU and on their trust in the clinicians caring for the patient. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by two reviewers. Constant comparison was used to identify themes pertaining to trust. Thirty surrogate interviews revealed five dimensions of trust in ICU clinicians: technical competence, communication, honesty, benevolence, and interpersonal skills. Most surrogates emphasized the role of nurses in trust formation, frequently citing their technical competence. Trust in physicians was most commonly related to honesty and the quality of their communication with surrogates.
Interventions to improve trust in the ICU should be role-specific, since surrogate expectations are different for physicians and nurses with regard to behaviors relevant to trust. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and explore the impact of trust modification on clinician-family conflict.
在重症监护病房(ICU),临床医生与替代决策者之间的讨论常常伴随着关于患者预后或护理计划的冲突。信任在限制冲突方面发挥着作用,但对于ICU中信任的决定因素知之甚少。我们试图确定ICU中信任的维度以及有助于信任形成的临床医生行为。
前瞻性定性研究。
一所大型城市大学医院的内科重症监护病房。
内科重症监护病房中插管并接受机械通气患者的替代决策者。
半结构化访谈聚焦于替代决策者在ICU的总体经历以及他们对照顾患者的临床医生的信任。访谈进行录音,逐字转录,并由两名审阅者进行编码。采用持续比较法来确定与信任相关的主题。30次替代决策者访谈揭示了对ICU临床医生信任的五个维度:技术能力、沟通、诚实、仁爱和人际技能。大多数替代决策者强调护士在信任形成中的作用,经常提及他们的技术能力。对医生的信任最常与诚实以及他们与替代决策者沟通的质量有关。
由于替代决策者对医生和护士在与信任相关行为方面的期望不同,因此在ICU中提高信任的干预措施应针对不同角色。需要进一步研究来证实我们的发现,并探讨改变信任对临床医生与家属冲突的影响。