VanKerkhoff Todd D, Viglianti Elizabeth M, Detsky Michael E, Kruser Jacqueline M
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Clin Pulm Med. 2019 Sep;26(5):141-145. doi: 10.1097/cpm.0000000000000323.
Consider the hypothetical case of a 75-year-old patient admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to pneumonia and systolic heart failure. Although she suffers from a potentially treatable infection, her advanced age and chronic illness increase her risk of experiencing a poor outcome. Her family feels conflicted about whether the use of mechanical ventilation would be acceptable given what they understand about her values and preferences. In the ICU setting, clinicians, patients, and surrogate decision-makers frequently face challenges of prognostic uncertainty as well as uncertainty regarding patients' goals and values. Time-limited trials (TLTs) of life-sustaining treatments in the ICU have been proposed as one strategy to help facilitate goal-concordant care in the midst of a complex and high-stakes decision-making environment. TLTs represent an agreement between clinicians and patients or surrogate decision-makers to employ a therapy for an agreed-upon time period, with a plan for subsequent reassessment of the patient's progress according to previously-established criteria for improvement or decline. Herein, we review the concept of TLTs in intensive care, and explore their potential benefits, barriers, and challenges. Research demonstrates that, in practice, TLTs are conducted infrequently and often incompletely, and are challenged by system-level factors that diminish their effectiveness. The promise of TLTs in intensive care warrants continued research efforts, including implementation studies to improve adoption and fidelity, observational research to determine optimal timeframes for TLTs, and interventional trials to determine if TLTs ultimately improve the delivery of goal-concordant care in the ICU.
一名75岁的患者因肺炎和收缩性心力衰竭导致急性缺氧性呼吸衰竭而入住重症监护病房(ICU)。尽管她患有可治疗的感染,但她的高龄和慢性病增加了预后不良的风险。鉴于对她的价值观和偏好的了解,她的家人对于使用机械通气是否可接受感到矛盾。在ICU环境中,临床医生、患者和替代决策者经常面临预后不确定性以及患者目标和价值观方面的不确定性挑战。在ICU中对维持生命治疗进行限时试验(TLT)已被提议作为一种策略,以帮助在复杂且高风险的决策环境中促进目标一致的护理。TLT代表临床医生与患者或替代决策者之间达成的协议,即在商定的时间段内采用一种治疗方法,并根据先前确定的改善或恶化标准对患者的进展进行后续重新评估的计划。在此,我们回顾ICU中TLT的概念,并探讨其潜在益处、障碍和挑战。研究表明,在实践中,TLT很少进行且往往不完整,并受到削弱其有效性的系统层面因素的挑战。ICU中TLT的前景值得继续进行研究,包括旨在提高采用率和保真度的实施研究、确定TLT最佳时间框架的观察性研究,以及确定TLT是否最终改善ICU中目标一致护理的干预性试验。