Santa Casa de São Paulo, Escola de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Medicina Interna, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Santa Casa de São Paulo, Escola de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Medicina Laboratorial e Patologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Infect Dis. 2016 Sep-Oct;20(5):468-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
To compare cultured microorganisms identified on endotracheal tubes biofilms through sonication technique with traditional tracheal aspirate collected at extubation of pediatric intensive care unit patients.
Demographic and epidemiological data were analyzed to identify factors possibly related with the microbiological profile of the two collection methods. Associations between categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, or Student's t test. p-Value <0.05 were considered significant.
Thirty endotracheal tubes and tracheal aspirates samples from 27 subjects were analyzed. Only one patient presented the clinical diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Overall, 50% of bacteria were Gram-negative bacilli, followed by Gram-positive bacteria in 37%, and fungi in 10%. No statistically significant difference on the distribution of Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria (p=0.996), and fungi (p=0.985) were observed between the collection methods. Pseudomonas spp. was the most frequent microorganism identified (23.8%), followed by Streptococcus spp. (18.5%), Acinetobacter spp. (15.9%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (11.2%), and Klebsiella spp. (8.6%). Concordant results between methods amounted to 83.3%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii showed carbapenem resistance in 50% and 43.7% of the isolates, respectively. In general, cultures after endotracheal tubes sonication (non-centrifuged sonication fluid and centrifuged sonication fluid) yielded bacteria with higher rates of antimicrobial resistance compared to tracheal aspirates cultures. Additionally, in 12 subjects (40%), we observed discrepancies regarding microbiologic profiles of cultures performed using the collection methods.
Our study demonstrated that sonication technique can be applied to ET biofilms to identify microorganisms attached to their surface with a great variety of species identified. However, we did not find significant differences in comparison with the traditional tracheal aspirate culture approach.
比较经气管导管生物膜超声技术与儿科重症监护病房患者拔管时传统气管抽吸物培养的微生物。
分析人口统计学和流行病学数据,以确定与两种采集方法微生物特征相关的可能因素。使用卡方检验或 Fisher 精确检验或 Student's t 检验分析分类和连续变量之间的关联。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
共分析了 27 例患者的 30 个气管导管和气管抽吸样本。只有 1 例患者有呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床诊断。总体而言,50%的细菌为革兰氏阴性杆菌,其次是革兰氏阳性菌(37%)和真菌(10%)。两种采集方法的革兰氏阳性或革兰氏阴性细菌(p=0.996)和真菌(p=0.985)分布无统计学差异。最常见的微生物为铜绿假单胞菌(23.8%),其次为链球菌(18.5%)、不动杆菌(15.9%)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(11.2%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(8.6%)。两种方法的结果一致性为 83.3%。铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌的分离株中,分别有 50%和 43.7%对碳青霉烯类药物耐药。一般来说,与气管抽吸物培养相比,经气管导管超声(非离心超声液和离心超声液)培养的细菌具有更高的抗生素耐药率。此外,在 12 例患者(40%)中,我们观察到两种采集方法的培养物微生物谱存在差异。
本研究表明,超声技术可应用于 ET 生物膜,以鉴定附着在其表面的微生物,可鉴定出多种不同的微生物。然而,与传统的气管抽吸培养方法相比,我们没有发现显著差异。