Paes Juliana, de Oliveira Leticia, Pereira Mirtes Garcia, David Isabel, Souza Gabriela Guerra Leal, Sobral Ana Paula, Machado-Pinheiro Walter, Mocaiber Izabela
Laboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, Department of Natural Sciences, Institute of Humanities and Health, Federal Fluminense University, Rio das Ostras, RJ, Brazil.
Laboratory of Neurophysiology of Behavior, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Biomedical Institute, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0160582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160582. eCollection 2016.
It is well established that emotions are organized around two motivational systems: the defensive and the appetitive. Individual differences are relevant factors in emotional reactions, making them more flexible and less stereotyped. There is evidence that health professionals have lower emotional reactivity when viewing scenes of situations involving pain. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the rating of pictures of surgical procedure depends on their personal/occupational relevance. Fifty-two female Nursing (health discipline) and forty-eight Social Work (social science discipline) students participated in the experiment, which consisted of the presentation of 105 images of different categories (e.g., neutral, food), including 25 images of surgical procedure. Volunteers judged each picture according to its valence (pleasantness) and arousal using the Self-Assessment Manikin scale (dimensional approach). Additionally, the participants chose the word that best described what they felt while viewing each image (discrete emotion perspective). The average valence score for surgical procedure pictures for the Nursing group (M = 4.57; SD = 1.02) was higher than the score for the Social Work group (M = 3.31; SD = 1.05), indicating that Nursing students classified those images as less unpleasant than the Social Work students did. Additionally, the majority of Nursing students (65.4%) chose "neutral" as the word that best described what they felt while viewing the pictures. In the Social Work group, disgust (54.2%) was the emotion that was most frequently chosen. The evaluation of emotional stimuli differed according to the groups' personal/occupational relevance: Nursing students judged pictures of surgical procedure as less unpleasant than the Social Work students did, possibly reflecting an emotional regulation skill or some type of habituation that is critically relevant to their future professional work.
众所周知,情绪是围绕两种动机系统组织起来的:防御性系统和欲求性系统。个体差异是情绪反应中的相关因素,使情绪反应更具灵活性且更少刻板性。有证据表明,健康专业人员在观看涉及疼痛的场景时情绪反应较低。本研究的目的是调查对外科手术图片的评分是否取决于其个人/职业相关性。52名护理学专业(健康学科)女生和48名社会工作专业(社会科学学科)学生参与了该实验,实验包括展示105张不同类别的图片(如中性、食物),其中有25张外科手术图片。志愿者使用自我评估人体模型量表(维度法)根据每张图片的效价(愉悦度)和唤醒度进行评判。此外,参与者选择最能描述他们观看每张图片时感受的词语(离散情绪视角)。护理组外科手术图片的平均效价得分(M = 4.57;SD = 1.02)高于社会工作组(M = 3.31;SD = 1.05),这表明护理专业学生将这些图片归类为比社会工作专业学生认为的不那么令人不快。此外,大多数护理专业学生(65.4%)选择“中性”作为最能描述他们观看图片时感受的词语。在社会工作组中,厌恶(54.2%)是最常被选择的情绪。对情绪刺激的评估因各组的个人/职业相关性而异:护理专业学生认为外科手术图片比社会工作专业学生认为的不那么令人不快,这可能反映了一种情绪调节技能或某种与他们未来专业工作密切相关的习惯化。