Anadon Laura Diaz, Chan Gabriel, Harley Alicia G, Matus Kira, Moon Suerie, Murthy Sharmila L, Clark William C
Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Department of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Public Policy, University College London, London W1T 6EY, United Kingdom;
Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 30;113(35):9682-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525004113. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
This paper presents insights and action proposals to better harness technological innovation for sustainable development. We begin with three key insights from scholarship and practice. First, technological innovation processes do not follow a set sequence but rather emerge from complex adaptive systems involving many actors and institutions operating simultaneously from local to global scales. Barriers arise at all stages of innovation, from the invention of a technology through its selection, production, adaptation, adoption, and retirement. Second, learning from past efforts to mobilize innovation for sustainable development can be greatly improved through structured cross-sectoral comparisons that recognize the socio-technical nature of innovation systems. Third, current institutions (rules, norms, and incentives) shaping technological innovation are often not aligned toward the goals of sustainable development because impoverished, marginalized, and unborn populations too often lack the economic and political power to shape innovation systems to meet their needs. However, these institutions can be reformed, and many actors have the power to do so through research, advocacy, training, convening, policymaking, and financing. We conclude with three practice-oriented recommendations to further realize the potential of innovation for sustainable development: (i) channels for regularized learning across domains of practice should be established; (ii) measures that systematically take into account the interests of underserved populations throughout the innovation process should be developed; and (iii) institutions should be reformed to reorient innovation systems toward sustainable development and ensure that all innovation stages and scales are considered at the outset.
本文提出了一些见解和行动建议,以更好地利用技术创新促进可持续发展。我们首先从学术研究和实践中得出的三个关键见解说起。第一,技术创新过程并非遵循固定的顺序,而是源自复杂的适应性系统,其中涉及许多行为体和机构,它们在从地方到全球的各个层面同时运作。从技术发明到其选择、生产、适应、采用和淘汰的整个创新过程的各个阶段都会出现障碍。第二,通过认识到创新系统的社会技术性质的结构化跨部门比较,可以大大改进从过去为促进可持续发展而推动创新的努力中吸取的经验教训。第三,当前塑造技术创新的制度(规则、规范和激励措施)往往与可持续发展目标不一致,因为贫困、边缘化和未出生的人群往往缺乏经济和政治权力来塑造创新系统以满足他们的需求。然而,这些制度是可以改革的,许多行为体有能力通过研究、宣传、培训、召集会议、制定政策和提供资金来进行改革。我们最后提出三项以实践为导向的建议,以进一步实现创新促进可持续发展的潜力:(一)应建立跨实践领域的定期学习渠道;(二)应制定在整个创新过程中系统考虑服务不足人群利益的措施;(三)应改革制度,使创新系统重新导向可持续发展,并确保从一开始就考虑到所有创新阶段和规模。