Suppr超能文献

少数群体身份与精神困扰:群体密度效应的比较

Minority status and mental distress: a comparison of group density effects.

作者信息

Schofield P, Das-Munshi J, Bécares L, Morgan C, Bhavsar V, Hotopf M, Hatch S L

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London,UK.

The University of Manchester,Manchester,UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2016 Oct;46(14):3051-3059. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716001835. Epub 2016 Aug 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been observed that mental disorders, such as psychosis, are more common for people in some ethnic groups in areas where their ethnic group is less common. We set out to test whether this ethnic density effect reflects minority status in general, by looking at three situations where individual characteristics differ from what is usual in a locality.

METHOD

Using data from the South East London Community Health study (n = 1698) we investigated associations between minority status (defined by: ethnicity, household status and occupational social class) and risk of psychotic experiences, common mental disorders and parasuicide. We used a multilevel logistic model to examine cross-level interactions between minority status at individual and neighbourhood levels.

RESULTS

Being Black in an area where this was less common (10%) was associated with higher odds of psychotic experiences [odds ratio (OR) 1.34 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.67], and attempted suicide (OR 1.84 95% CI 1.19-2.85). Living alone where this was less usual (10% less) was associated with increased odds of psychotic experiences (OR 2.18 95% CI 0.91-5.26), while being in a disadvantaged social class where this was less usual (10% less) was associated with increased odds of attempted suicide (OR 1.33 95% CI 1.03-1.71). We found no evidence for an association with common mental disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between minority status and mental distress was most apparent when defined in terms of broad ethnic group but was also observed for individual household status and occupational social class.

摘要

背景

据观察,在某些族裔群体占比相对较少的地区,精神病等精神障碍在这些群体中更为常见。我们试图通过研究三种个体特征与当地普遍情况不同的情形,来检验这种族裔密度效应是否总体上反映了少数群体地位。

方法

利用来自伦敦东南部社区健康研究的数据(n = 1698),我们调查了少数群体地位(由种族、家庭状况和职业社会阶层定义)与精神病体验、常见精神障碍及自杀未遂风险之间的关联。我们使用多水平逻辑模型来检验个体和邻里层面少数群体地位之间的跨水平交互作用。

结果

在某个族裔占比相对较少(10%)的地区,黑人出现精神病体验的几率更高[优势比(OR)为1.34,95%置信区间(CI)为1.07 - 1.67],且自杀未遂的几率也更高(OR为1.84,95%CI为1.19 - 2.85)。独自居住在这种情况相对较少(少10%)的地方,出现精神病体验的几率增加(OR为2.18,95%CI为0.91 - 5.26),而处于社会阶层劣势且这种情况相对较少(少10%)的地方,自杀未遂的几率增加(OR为1.33,95%CI为1.03 - 1.71)。我们没有发现与常见精神障碍有关联的证据。

结论

少数群体地位与精神困扰之间的关系在按照宽泛种族群体定义时最为明显,但在个体家庭状况和职业社会阶层方面也有体现。

相似文献

3
Ethnic differences in psychosis-Lay epidemiology explanations.精神分裂症的种族差异-公众流行病学解释。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):965-973. doi: 10.1111/hex.12901. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验