Petersen Søren O, Olsen Anne B, Elsgaard Lars, Triolo Jin Mi, Sommer Sven G
Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 16;11(8):e0160968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160968. eCollection 2016.
Quantifying in-house emissions of methane (CH4) from liquid manure (slurry) is difficult due to high background emissions from enteric processes, yet of great importance for correct estimation of CH4 emissions from manure management and effects of treatment technologies such as anaerobic digestion. In this study CH4 production rates were determined in 20 pig slurry and 11 cattle slurry samples collected beneath slatted floors on six representative farms; rates were determined within 24 h at temperatures close to the temperature in slurry pits at the time of collection. Methane production rates in pig and cattle slurry differed significantly at 0.030 and 0.011 kg CH4 kg-1 VS (volatile solids). Current estimates of CH4 emissions from pig and cattle manure management correspond to 0.032 and 0.015 kg CH4 kg-1, respectively, indicating that slurry pits under animal confinements are a significant source. Fractions of degradable volatile solids (VSd, kg kg-1 VS) were estimated using an aerobic biodegradability assay and total organic C analyses. The VSd in pig and cattle slurry averaged 0.51 and 0.33 kg kg-1 VS, and it was estimated that on average 43 and 28% of VSd in fresh excreta from pigs and cattle, respectively, had been lost at the time of sampling. An empirical model of CH4 emissions from slurry was reparameterised based on experimental results. A sensitivity analysis indicated that predicted CH4 emissions were highly sensitive to uncertainties in the value of lnA of the Arrhenius equation, but much less sensitive to uncertainties in VSd or slurry temperature. A model application indicated that losses of carbon in VS as CO2 may be much greater than losses as CH4. Implications of these results for the correct estimation of CH4 emissions from manure management, and for the mitigation potential of treatments such as anaerobic digestion, are discussed.
由于肠道过程产生的背景排放较高,因此很难对液体粪肥( slurry )中的甲烷(CH4)内部排放量进行量化,但这对于正确估算粪肥管理中的CH4排放量以及厌氧消化等处理技术的效果非常重要。在本研究中,对六个代表性农场的板条地板下收集的20份猪粪浆和11份牛粪浆样本的CH4产生速率进行了测定;在接近采集时粪浆坑温度的温度下,于24小时内测定了速率。猪粪浆和牛粪浆的甲烷产生速率在0.030和0.011 kg CH4 kg-1挥发性固体(VS)时有显著差异。目前对猪和牛粪肥管理中CH4排放量的估计分别为0.032和0.015 kg CH4 kg-1,这表明动物饲养场所下的粪浆坑是一个重要的排放源。使用好氧生物降解性测定法和总有机碳分析来估算可降解挥发性固体(VSd,kg kg-1 VS)的比例。猪粪浆和牛粪浆中的VSd平均为0.51和0.33 kg kg-1 VS,据估计,在采样时,猪和牛新鲜粪便中VSd的平均损失分别为43%和28%。基于实验结果对粪浆CH4排放的经验模型进行了重新参数化。敏感性分析表明,预测的CH4排放对阿伦尼乌斯方程lnA值的不确定性高度敏感,但对VSd或粪浆温度的不确定性敏感性要低得多。模型应用表明,VS中作为CO2的碳损失可能远大于作为CH4的损失。讨论了这些结果对正确估算粪肥管理中CH4排放以及对厌氧消化等处理的减排潜力的影响。