Gurudevan Swaminatha, Garg Pankaj, Malik Shaista, Khattar Ramni, Saremi Farhood, Hecht Harvey, DeMaria Anthony, Narula Jagat
Department of Cardiology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Cardiology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 16;6(8):e005148. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005148.
This study was designed to evaluate the severity of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with asymptomatic impaired fasting glucose (IFG) compared to those with diabetes mellitus (DM) and normal fasting glucose (NFG), as measured by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA).
Subjects were divided into three groups: NFG (<100 mg/dL), IFG (100-125 mg/dL) and DM. Coronary artery calcium on non-contrast CT and plaque analysis on CCTA were performed.
University hospital, single centre.
216 asymptomatic participants prospectively underwent CCTA for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Atherosclerotic plaque burden in IFG compared to NFG patients.
2664 segments were analysed in 120 NFG, 44 IFG and 52 DM participants. The mean calcium scores were 178±395, 259±510 and 414±836 for NFG, IFG and DM, respectively (p=0·037). The mean plaque burdens in the NFG, IFG and DM groups were 0.31±0.45, 0.50±0.69 and 0.68±0.69, respectively (p=0·0007). A greater proportion of patients with DM (19/52, 36.5%) and IFG (13/44, 29.5%) had obstructive CAD compared to those with NFG (16/120, 13.3%) (p=0.0015). The number of segments with severe disease was significantly higher in the DM (60/637, 9.4%) and IFG (42/539, 7.8%) groups compared to that in the NFG group (34/1488, 2.3%) (p=0.0001).
(1) IFG and DM have significantly higher, but comparable, calcium scores, plaque burden and obstructive CAD compared to NFG in asymptomatic individuals. (2) Pending corroboration by other reports, more intensive efforts may be devoted to the evaluation and treatment of patients with IFG.
本研究旨在通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)评估无症状空腹血糖受损(IFG)患者与糖尿病(DM)患者及空腹血糖正常(NFG)患者相比,亚临床动脉粥样硬化的严重程度。
将受试者分为三组:NFG(<100 mg/dL)、IFG(100 - 125 mg/dL)和DM。进行非增强CT上的冠状动脉钙化及CCTA上的斑块分析。
大学医院,单中心。
216名无症状参与者前瞻性地接受了CCTA以评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。
IFG患者与NFG患者相比的动脉粥样硬化斑块负荷。
对120名NFG、44名IFG和52名DM参与者的2664个节段进行了分析。NFG、IFG和DM的平均钙化积分分别为178±395、259±510和414±836(p = 0·037)。NFG、IFG和DM组的平均斑块负荷分别为0.31±0.45、0.50±0.69和0.68±0.69(p = 0·0007)。与NFG患者(16/120,13.3%)相比,DM患者(19/52,36.5%)和IFG患者(13/44,29.5%)中患有阻塞性CAD的比例更高(p = 0.0015)。与NFG组(34/1488,2.3%)相比,DM组(60/637,9.4%)和IFG组(42/539,7.8%)中患有严重疾病的节段数量显著更高(p = 0.0001)。
(1)在无症状个体中,与NFG相比,IFG和DM具有显著更高但相当的钙化积分、斑块负荷和阻塞性CAD。(2)在其他报告证实之前,可能需要更深入地评估和治疗IFG患者。