Weissman Myrna M, Berry Obianuju O, Warner Virginia, Gameroff Marc J, Skipper Jamie, Talati Ardesheer, Pilowsky Daniel J, Wickramaratne Priya
Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York2Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York3Division of Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York4Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 1;73(9):970-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1586.
The increased risk of major depression in the offspring of depressed parents is well known. Whether the risk is transmitted beyond 2 generations is less well known. To our knowledge, no published study with direct interviews of family members and the generations in the age of risk for depression has evaluated beyond 2 generations. This information is important for detecting individuals at highest risk who may benefit from early intervention.
To examine the familial aggregation of psychiatric disorder and functioning in grandchildren by their biological parents' and grandparents' depression status.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal retrospective cohort family study of 251 grandchildren (generation 3 [mean age, 18 years]) interviewed a mean of 2.0 times and their biological parents (generation 2) interviewed a mean of 4.6 times and grandparents (generation 1) interviewed up to 30 years. The study dates were January 1982 (wave 1) to June 2015 (wave 6).
Cumulative rates of psychiatric disorders and functioning collected for all generations by clinically trained interviewers and best-estimate diagnosis made blind to diagnoses in members of previous generations.
There were 91 families (G1) in the original sample, of whom 77 were eligible for inclusion (had a grandchild older than 5 years), and 80.5% (62 of 77) participated in the study. When first examining only 2 generations, the biological children (generation 3) of depressed compared with nondepressed parents (generation 2) had 2-fold increased risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.02; 95% CI, 1.08-3.79; P = .03), any disruptive disorder (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.05-2.75; P = .03), substance dependence (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.24-7.08; P = .01), any suicidal ideation or gesture (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.28-4.66; P = .007), and poor functioning (F = 38.25, P < .001). When 3 generations were examined stratified by parental and grandparental depression status, association of a parent's MDD on the grandchild's MDD but not other disorders varied with the grandparent's depression status: grandchildren with both a depressed parent and grandparent (n = 38) were at highest risk for MDD. Among grandchildren without a depressed grandparent, those with (n = 14) vs without (n = 74) a depressed parent had overall poorer functioning (F = 6.31, P = .01) but not higher rates of any of the disorders. Potential confounding variables did not have a meaningful effect on the association between grandchild outcomes and parental or grandparental depression.
In this study, biological offspring with 2 previous generations affected with major depression were at highest risk for major depression, suggesting the potential value of determining family history of depression in children and adolescents beyond 2 generations. Early intervention in offspring of 2 generations affected with moderate to severely impairing MDD seems warranted. The specificity of the transmission of depression across 3 generations may make this group a homogeneous sample for biological marker studies.
抑郁父母的后代患重度抑郁症的风险增加,这是众所周知的。而这种风险是否会传递至两代以上则鲜为人知。据我们所知,尚无已发表的研究对处于抑郁症风险年龄的家庭成员及三代人进行直接访谈并评估超过两代的情况。这些信息对于识别可能从早期干预中受益的高危个体非常重要。
通过其亲生父母及祖父母的抑郁状况来研究孙辈中精神障碍及功能的家族聚集性。
设计、背景和参与者:对251名孙辈(第3代[平均年龄18岁])进行纵向回顾性队列家庭研究,平均访谈2.0次;对其亲生父母(第2代)平均访谈4.6次;对祖父母(第1代)访谈长达30年。研究时间为1982年1月(第1波)至2015年6月(第6波)。
由临床训练有素的访谈者收集所有三代人的精神障碍累积发生率及功能状况,并在对前几代成员的诊断不知情的情况下进行最佳估计诊断。
原始样本中有91个家庭(G1),其中77个符合纳入标准(有年龄超过5岁的孙辈),80.5%(77个中的62个)参与了研究。仅首先检查两代时,与未患抑郁症的父母(第2代)相比,患抑郁症的父母的亲生子女(第3代)患重度抑郁症(MDD)的风险增加2倍(风险比[HR],2.02;95%可信区间[CI],1.08 - 3.79;P = 0.03),患任何破坏性行为障碍的风险增加(HR,1.70;95% CI,1.05 - 2.75;P = 0.03),物质依赖风险增加(HR,2.96;95% CI,1.24 - 7.08;P = 0.01),任何自杀意念或行为的风险增加(HR,2.44;95% CI,1.28 - 4.66;P = 0.007),且功能较差(F = 38.25,P < 0.001)。当按父母和祖父母的抑郁状况对三代人进行分层检查时,父母患MDD与孙辈患MDD之间的关联,但与其他障碍无关,这随祖父母的抑郁状况而变化:父母和祖父母均患抑郁症的孙辈(n = 38)患MDD的风险最高。在没有患抑郁症的祖父母的孙辈中,有患抑郁症父母(n = 14)与没有患抑郁症父母(n = 74)的孙辈相比,总体功能较差(F = 6.31,P = 0.01),但任何障碍的发生率均未升高。潜在的混杂变量对孙辈结局与父母或祖父母抑郁之间的关联没有显著影响。
在本研究中,前两代患有重度抑郁症的亲生后代患重度抑郁症的风险最高,这表明确定儿童和青少年两代以上的抑郁症家族史具有潜在价值。对两代患有中度至重度损害性MDD的后代进行早期干预似乎是必要的。抑郁症三代间传递的特异性可能使该群体成为生物学标志物研究的同质样本。