Chakraborty R, Muchtar E, Kumar S, Buadi F K, Dingli D, Dispenzieri A, Hayman S R, Hogan W J, Kapoor P, Lacy M Q, Leung N, Gertz M A
Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hospitalist Services, Essentia Health-St. Joseph's Medical Center, Brainerd, MN, USA.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jan;52(1):34-40. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.214. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
We compared overall survival (OS) of 1017 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who were treated with different novel agent-based induction regimens and who underwent early autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Subgroups were defined by type of induction therapy: cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD; n=193), bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vd; n=64), lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd; n=251), bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd; n=126), thalidomide-dexamethasone (Td; n=155) and vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone (VAD/Dex; n=228). The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 66.7 months. The 5-year OS rates with CyBorD, Vd, Rd, VRd, Td and VAD/Dex were 79.2%, 72.3%, 79.2%, 79.0%, 57.4% and 63.4%, respectively (log-rank, P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, after controlling for important patient and disease variables, VRd had a superior OS compared with CyBorD (hazard ratio (HR), 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10-0.88; P=0.03) and Vd (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.52; P=0.002). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that among patients completing induction therapy and continuing to early transplant, VRd induction leads to improved OS compared with CyBorD and Vd regimens.
我们比较了1017例新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的总生存期(OS),这些患者接受了不同的基于新型药物的诱导方案治疗,并接受了早期自体干细胞移植(ASCT)。亚组根据诱导治疗类型定义:环磷酰胺-硼替佐米-地塞米松(CyBorD;n = 193)、硼替佐米-地塞米松(Vd;n = 64)、来那度胺-地塞米松(Rd;n = 251)、硼替佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松(VRd;n = 126)、沙利度胺-地塞米松(Td;n = 155)以及长春新碱-阿霉素-地塞米松或仅用地塞米松(VAD/Dex;n = 228)。存活患者的中位随访时间为66.7个月。CyBorD、Vd、Rd、VRd、Td和VAD/Dex的5年总生存率分别为79.2%、72.3%、79.2%、79.0%、57.4%和63.4%(对数秩检验,P<0.001)。在多变量分析中,在控制了重要的患者和疾病变量后,VRd的总生存期优于CyBorD(风险比(HR),0.32;95%置信区间(CI),0.10 - 0.88;P = 0.03)和Vd(HR,0.16;95%CI,0.04 - 0.52;P = 0.002)。总之,我们的研究表明,在完成诱导治疗并继续进行早期移植的患者中,与CyBorD和Vd方案相比,VRd诱导可改善总生存期。