AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Geoinformatics and Applied Computer Science, Cracow, Poland.
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Informatics, Gliwice, Poland.
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017 Jan;55:13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
The corneal endothelium state is verified on the basis of an in vivo specular microscope image from which the shape and density of cells are exploited for data description. Due to the relatively low image quality resulting from a high magnification of the living, non-stained tissue, both manual and automatic analysis of the data is a challenging task. Although, many automatic or semi-automatic solutions have already been introduced, all of them are prone to inaccuracy. This work presents a comparison of four methods (fully-automated or semi-automated) for endothelial cell segmentation, all of which represent a different approach to cell segmentation; fast robust stochastic watershed (FRSW), KH method, active contours solution (SNAKE), and TOPCON ImageNET. Moreover, an improvement framework is introduced which aims to unify precise cell border location in images pre-processed with differing techniques. Finally, the influence of the selected methods on clinical parameters is examined, both with and without the improvement framework application. The experiments revealed that although the image segmentation approaches differ, the measures calculated for clinical parameters are in high accordance when CV (coefficient of variation), and CVSL (coefficient of variation of cell sides length) are considered. Higher variation was noticed for the H (hexagonality) metric. Utilisation of the improvement framework assured better repeatability of precise endothelial cell border location between the methods while diminishing the dispersion of clinical parameter values calculated for such images. Finally, it was proven statistically that the image processing method applied for endothelial cell analysis does not influence the ability to differentiate between the images using medical parameters.
角膜内皮细胞状态是基于活体共聚焦显微镜图像来验证的,该图像可用于描述细胞的形状和密度。由于对活的、未染色组织进行高倍放大,图像质量相对较低,因此手动和自动分析数据都是一项具有挑战性的任务。尽管已经引入了许多自动或半自动解决方案,但它们都容易出现不准确的情况。本工作比较了四种(全自动或半自动)用于内皮细胞分割的方法,这些方法都代表了细胞分割的不同方法;快速稳健随机分水岭(FRSW)、KH 方法、主动轮廓解(SNAKE)和 TOPCON ImageNET。此外,还引入了一个改进框架,旨在统一不同技术预处理图像中精确的细胞边界位置。最后,检查了所选方法对临床参数的影响,包括和不包括改进框架的应用。实验表明,尽管图像分割方法不同,但当考虑 CV(变异系数)和 CVSL(细胞边长变异系数)时,计算出的临床参数的测量值高度一致。对于 H(正六边形度)度量,变化较大。改进框架的使用确保了在方法之间精确的内皮细胞边界位置的重复性更好,同时减少了此类图像计算的临床参数值的分散。最后,统计学证明,用于内皮细胞分析的图像处理方法不会影响使用医疗参数区分图像的能力。