Mace Georgina M, Hails Rosemary S, Cryle Philip, Harlow Julian, Clarke Stewart J
Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT UK.
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Maclean Building Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford Oxon. OX10 8BB UK.
J Appl Ecol. 2015 Jun;52(3):641-653. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12431. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
Natural capital is essential for goods and services on which people depend. Yet pressures on the environment mean that natural capital assets are continuing to decline and degrade, putting such benefits at risk. Systematic monitoring of natural assets is a major challenge that could be both unaffordable and unmanageable without a way to focus efforts. Here we introduce a simple approach, based on the commonly used management tool of a risk register, to highlight natural assets whose condition places benefits at risk.We undertake a preliminary assessment using a risk register for natural capital assets in the UK based solely on existing information. The status and trends of natural capital assets are assessed using asset-benefit relationships for ten kinds of benefits (food, fibre (timber), energy, aesthetics, freshwater (quality), recreation, clean air, wildlife, hazard protection and equable climate) across eight broad habitat types in the UK based on three dimensions of natural capital within each of the habitat types (quality, quantity and spatial configuration). We estimate the status and trends of benefits relative to societal targets using existing regulatory limits and policy commitments, and allocate scores of high, medium or low risk to asset-benefit relationships that are both subject to management and of concern.The risk register approach reveals substantial gaps in knowledge about asset-benefit relationships which limit the scope and rigour of the assessment (especially for marine and urban habitats). Nevertheless, we find strong indications that certain assets (in freshwater, mountain, moors and heathland habitats) are at high risk in relation to their ability to sustain certain benefits (especially freshwater, wildlife and climate regulation). . With directed data gathering, especially to monitor trends, improve metrics related to asset-benefit relationships, and improve understanding of nonlinearities and thresholds, the natural capital risk register could provide a useful tool. If updated regularly, it could direct monitoring efforts, focus research and protect and manage those natural assets where benefits are at highest risk.
自然资本对于人们所依赖的商品和服务至关重要。然而,环境压力意味着自然资本资产持续减少和退化,使这些益处面临风险。对自然资产进行系统监测是一项重大挑战,若没有集中精力的方法,可能既负担不起又难以管理。在此,我们引入一种基于常用风险登记管理工具的简单方法,以突出那些状况使益处面临风险的自然资产。我们仅依据现有信息,使用英国自然资本资产风险登记册进行初步评估。基于英国八种广泛栖息地类型内自然资本的三个维度(质量、数量和空间配置),利用十种益处(食物、纤维(木材)、能源、美学、淡水(质量)、娱乐、清洁空气、野生动物、灾害防护和稳定气候)的资产 - 益处关系,评估自然资本资产的状况和趋势。我们利用现有监管限制和政策承诺,估计相对于社会目标的益处状况和趋势,并为既需管理又受关注的资产 - 益处关系分配高、中或低风险评分。风险登记册方法揭示了关于资产 - 益处关系的知识存在重大差距,这限制了评估的范围和严谨性(特别是对于海洋和城市栖息地)。尽管如此,我们发现有力迹象表明,某些资产(在淡水、山地、荒野和石南丛生的荒野栖息地)在维持某些益处(特别是淡水、野生动物和气候调节)的能力方面处于高风险。通过有针对性的数据收集,特别是监测趋势、改进与资产 - 益处关系相关的指标,以及增进对非线性和阈值的理解,自然资本风险登记册可成为一个有用工具。如果定期更新,它可指导监测工作、聚焦研究,并保护和管理那些益处面临最高风险的自然资产。