Montero-Marín Jesús, Araya Ricardo, Pérez-Yus María C, Mayoral Fermín, Gili Margalida, Botella Cristina, Baños Rosa, Castro Adoración, Romero-Sanchiz Pablo, López-Del-Hoyo Yolanda, Nogueira-Arjona Raquel, Vives Margarita, Riera Antoni, García-Campayo Javier
Faculty of Health Sciences and Sports, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 26;18(8):e231. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5695.
Depression is the most prevalent cause of illness-induced disability worldwide. Face-to-face psychotherapeutic interventions for depression can be challenging, so there is a need for other alternatives that allow these interventions to be offered. One feasible alternative is Internet-based psychological interventions. This is the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the effectiveness of an Internet-based intervention on depression in primary health care in Spain.
Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of a low-intensity therapist-guided (LITG) Internet-based program and a completely self-guided (CSG) Internet-based program with improved treatment as usual (iTAU) care for depression.
Multicenter, three-arm, parallel, RCT design, carried out between November 2012 and January 2014, with a follow-up of 15 months. In total, 296 adults from primary care settings in four Spanish regions, with mild or moderate major depression, were randomized to LITG (n=96), CSG (n=98), or iTAU (n=102). Research completers at follow-up were 63.5%. The intervention was Smiling is Fun, an Internet program based on cognitive behavioral therapy. All patients received iTAU by their general practitioners. Moreover, LITG received Smiling is Fun and the possibility of psychotherapeutic support on request by email, whereas CSG received only Smiling is Fun. The main outcome was the Beck Depression Inventory-II at 3 months from baseline. Mixed-effects multilevel analysis for repeated measures were undertaken.
There was no benefit for either CSG [(B coefficient=-1.15; P=.444)] or LITG [(B=-0.71; P=.634)] compared to iTAU, at 3 months. There were differences at 6 months [iTAU vs CSG (B=-4.22; P=.007); iTAU vs LITG (B=-4.34; P=.005)] and 15 months [iTAU vs CSG (B=-5.10; P=.001); iTAU vs LITG (B=-4.62; P=.002)]. There were no differences between CSG and LITG at any time. Adjusted and intention-to-treat models confirmed these findings.
An Internet-based intervention for depression combined with iTAU conferred a benefit over iTAU alone in the Spanish primary health care system.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01611818; https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol? selectaction=Edit&uid=U0001NPQ&ts=2&cx=gctdh2&sid=S0003KJ6 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6jbsUvUDz).
抑郁症是全球疾病所致残疾的最常见原因。面对面的抑郁症心理治疗干预可能具有挑战性,因此需要其他替代方法来提供这些干预。一种可行的替代方法是基于互联网的心理干预。这是西班牙第一项关于基于互联网的干预对初级卫生保健中抑郁症疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。
我们的目的是比较低强度治疗师指导(LITG)的基于互联网的项目和完全自我指导(CSG)的基于互联网的项目与改善的常规治疗(iTAU)对抑郁症的疗效。
采用多中心、三臂、平行RCT设计,于2012年11月至2014年1月进行,随访15个月。共有来自西班牙四个地区初级保健机构的296名患有轻度或中度重度抑郁症的成年人被随机分为LITG组(n = 96)、CSG组(n = 98)或iTAU组(n = 102)。随访时研究完成者为63.5%。干预措施是“微笑很有趣”,这是一个基于认知行为疗法的互联网项目。所有患者均由其全科医生提供iTAU。此外,LITG组接受“微笑很有趣”项目,并可通过电子邮件请求获得心理治疗支持,而CSG组仅接受“微笑很有趣”项目。主要结局是基线后3个月时的贝克抑郁量表第二版。对重复测量进行了混合效应多水平分析。
与iTAU组相比,3个月时CSG组[B系数=-1.15;P = 0.444]和LITG组[B=-0.71;P = 0.634]均无益处。6个月时[iTAU组与CSG组比较(B=-4.22;P = 0.007);iTAU组与LITG组比较(B=-4.34;P = 0.005)]和15个月时[iTAU组与CSG组比较(B=-5.10;P = 0.001);iTAU组与LITG组比较(B=-4.62;P = 0.002)]存在差异。CSG组和LITG组在任何时间均无差异。调整后的模型和意向性分析模型证实了这些结果。
在西班牙初级卫生保健系统中,基于互联网的抑郁症干预联合iTAU比单独使用iTAU更有益。
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01611818;https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?selectaction=Edit&uid=U0001NPQ&ts=2&cx=gctdh2&sid=S0003KJ6(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6jbsUvUDz)