College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jul;34(7):476-484. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204944. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is commonplace in the ED. Previous studies have identified capnography as a reliable indicator of PSA-induced respiratory depression. This review investigates the potential effect on patient safety of the use of capnography in addition to standard monitoring for adult patients undergoing PSA in the ED.
MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and Google Scholar were searched systematically for ED studies using capnography during PSA. Data extraction was performed by two independent authors. Using MedCalc V.13.3.3 and Meta-DiSc V.1.4, data were aggregated under the random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-test and the I statistic.
Of the 737 studies that were screened, 7 studies met the eligibility criteria, representing a total of 662 patients. The aggregate diagnostic accuracy for capnography identifying an adverse event included a diagnostic OR of approximately 6 (OR: 5.87; 95% CI 2.41 to 14.3; p<0.001), sensitivity 0.82 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.87), specificity 0.6 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.64), negative likelihood ratio 0.3 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.75) and positive likelihood ratio 1.89 (95% CI 1.53 to 2.34). There was a lack of statistical evidence for a difference in the proportion of adverse events detected when capnography was used in addition to standard monitoring (48.8% (95% CI 32.85 to 64.92)) compared with chance alone (50%).
There is no firm evidence that capnography provides additional safety compared with standard monitoring alone during PSA in adults in the ED. There is a paucity of published research involving preoxygenated patients who remain on high-flow oxygen throughout PSA. Well-powered randomised controlled trials, employing an accepted adverse event reporting tool in such patients, are required. Until then, we advocate continued compliance with current professional recommendations for the use of capnography during PSA in adults in the ED.
程序镇静和镇痛(PSA)在急诊科中很常见。先前的研究已经确定二氧化碳描记法是 PSA 引起的呼吸抑制的可靠指标。本综述调查了在急诊科接受 PSA 的成年患者除了标准监测外使用二氧化碳描记法对患者安全的潜在影响。
系统地在 MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL 和 Google Scholar 中搜索使用二氧化碳描记法进行 PSA 的急诊科研究。由两名独立作者进行数据提取。使用 MedCalc V.13.3.3 和 Meta-DiSc V.1.4,根据随机效应模型汇总数据,并使用 Cochran's Q 检验和 I 统计量评估异质性。
在筛选出的 737 项研究中,有 7 项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入 662 名患者。二氧化碳描记法识别不良事件的综合诊断准确性包括大约 6 的诊断优势比(OR:5.87;95%CI 2.41 至 14.3;p<0.001),敏感性为 0.82(95%CI 0.76 至 0.87),特异性为 0.6(95%CI 0.55 至 0.64),阴性似然比为 0.3(95%CI 0.12 至 0.75),阳性似然比为 1.89(95%CI 1.53 至 2.34)。当二氧化碳描记法与标准监测联合使用时,与单独机会检测到的不良事件比例(48.8%(95%CI 32.85 至 64.92))相比,没有统计学证据表明存在差异,而不是单独的标准监测。
目前尚无确凿证据表明在急诊科接受 PSA 的成人中,与单独使用标准监测相比,二氧化碳描记法能提供额外的安全性。在接受 PSA 的预吸氧患者中,涉及到使用高流量氧气的研究较少,且此类患者使用公认的不良事件报告工具进行研究的文献也很少。在这之前,我们提倡在急诊科接受 PSA 的成人中继续遵守目前关于使用二氧化碳描记法的专业建议。