• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk of discontinuation of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products clinical trials.高级治疗用药品临床试验终止的风险。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Aug 2;4. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v4.32232. eCollection 2016.
2
Advanced therapy medicinal products: current and future perspectives.先进治疗药品:现状与未来展望。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Apr 25;4. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v4.31036. eCollection 2016.
3
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products for Rare Diseases: State of Play of Incentives Supporting Development in Europe.用于罕见病的高级治疗药品:欧洲支持其研发的激励措施现状
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 May 16;4:53. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00053. eCollection 2017.
4
The Current State of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the Czech Republic.捷克共和国先进治疗药物产品的现状
Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev. 2018 Sep;29(3):132-147. doi: 10.1089/humc.2018.035. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
5
Comparison of regulatory pathways for the approval of advanced therapies in the European Union and the United States.比较欧盟和美国批准先进疗法的监管途径。
Cytotherapy. 2021 Mar;23(3):261-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.11.008. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
6
Call for More Effective Regulation of Clinical Trials with Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products Consisting of or Containing Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union.呼吁在欧盟内对包含或含有基因修饰生物体的先进治疗药物产品的临床试验进行更有效的监管。
Hum Gene Ther. 2021 Oct;32(19-20):997-1003. doi: 10.1089/hum.2021.058. Epub 2021 May 24.
7
Marketing Regulatory Oversight of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) in Europe: The EMA/CAT Perspective.欧洲高级治疗用药品(ATMPs)的市场监管监督:欧洲药品管理局/临床试验授权委员会的视角
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;871:103-30. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-18618-4_6.
8
Regulatory Frameworks for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Thailand.泰国的先进治疗药物监管框架。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1430:221-233. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-34567-8_13.
9
Advanced therapy medicinal product manufacturing under the hospital exemption and other exemption pathways in seven European Union countries.七个欧盟国家中,豁免医院和其他途径下的先进治疗药物产品制造。
Cytotherapy. 2020 Oct;22(10):592-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.04.092. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products for the Eye: Definitions and Regulatory Framework.用于眼部的先进治疗药物产品:定义与监管框架
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Mar 6;13(3):347. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13030347.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Minimisation Measures of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products Authorised in the EU Between 2009 and 2023: A Cross-Sectional Study.2009年至2023年欧盟批准的高级治疗用药品的风险最小化措施:一项横断面研究
Drug Saf. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01550-9.
2
Two Decades of Global Progress in Authorized Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: An Emerging Revolution in Therapeutic Strategies.二十年来全球授权先进治疗药物的进展:治疗策略的一场新兴革命。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Dec 17;8:547653. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.547653. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Advanced therapy medicinal products: current and future perspectives.先进治疗药品:现状与未来展望。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Apr 25;4. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v4.31036. eCollection 2016.
2
Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study.外科随机对照试验的终止与未发表:观察性研究
BMJ. 2014 Dec 9;349:g6870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6870.
3
Prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of early termination of cardiovascular clinical trials due to low recruitment: insights from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry.由于招募人数低而导致心血管临床试验提前终止的流行率、特征和预测因素:来自 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册库的见解。
Am Heart J. 2014 Aug;168(2):213-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 May 2.
4
High cancer drug prices in the United States: reasons and proposed solutions.美国抗癌药物价格高昂:原因及建议解决方案
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jul;10(4):e208-11. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001351. Epub 2014 May 6.
5
Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials.停止的随机试验的流行率、特征和发表情况。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1045-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1361.
6
A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials.有效性和功效试验基础指南。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 2;5(1):e45. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2013.13.
7
The just price of cancer drugs and the growing cost of cancer care: oncologists need to be part of the solution.抗癌药物的合理价格与癌症治疗成本的不断上升:肿瘤学家需要成为解决方案的一部分。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 1;31(28):3487-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3466. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
8
Net present value approaches for drug discovery.药物研发的净现值方法。
Springerplus. 2013 Apr 1;2(1):140. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-140. Print 2013 Dec.
9
Pharmaceutical innovation in the 21st century: new drug approvals in the first decade, 2000-2009.21 世纪的药物创新:2000-2009 年第一个十年的新药批准。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Feb;89(2):183-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.286. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
10
Premature discontinuation of clinical trial for reasons not related to efficacy, safety, or feasibility.因与疗效、安全性或可行性无关的原因而提前终止临床试验。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 10;322(7286):603-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7286.603.

高级治疗用药品临床试验终止的风险。

Risk of discontinuation of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products clinical trials.

作者信息

Hanna Eve, Rémuzat Cecile, Auquier Pascal, Toumi Mondher

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine - Public Health department, University Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France.

Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Aug 2;4. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v4.32232. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3402/jmahp.v4.32232
PMID:27570614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4973442/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) constitute a class of innovative products that encompasses gene therapy, somatic cell therapy, and tissue-engineered products (TEP). There is an increased investment of commercial and non-commercial sponsors in this field and a growing number of ATMPs randomized clinical trials (RCT) and patients enrolled in such trials. RCT generate data to prove the efficacy of a new therapy, but the discontinuation of RCTs wastes scarce resources. Our objective is to identify the number and characteristics of discontinued ATMPs trials in order to evaluate the rate of discontinuation.

METHODS

We searched for ATMPs trials conducted between 1999 to June 2015 using three databases, which are Clinicaltrials.gov, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and the EU Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT). We selected the ATMPs trials after elimination of the duplicates. We identified the disease areas and the sponsors as commercial or non-commercial organizations. We classified ATMPs by type and trial status, that is, ongoing, completed, terminated, discontinued, and prematurely ended. Then, we calculated the rate of discontinuation.

RESULTS

Between 1999 and June 2015, 143 withdrawn, terminated, or prematurely ended ATMPs clinical trials were identified. Between 1999 and June 2013, 474 ongoing and completed clinical trials were identified. Therefore, the rate of discontinuation of ATMPs trials is 23.18%, similar to that for non-ATMPs drugs in development. The probability of discontinuation is, respectively, 27.35, 16.28, and 16.34% for cell therapies, gene therapies, and TEP. The highest discontinuation rate is for oncology (43%), followed by cardiology (19.2%). It is almost the same for commercial and non-commercial sponsors; therefore, the discontinuation reason may not be financially driven.

CONCLUSION

No failure risk rate per development phase is available for ATMPs. The discontinuation rate may prove helpful when assessing the expected net present value to support portfolio arbitration and may be considered by patients and potential investigators in their decisions to participate in ATMP trials. These results carry limitation because the rationale for discontinuation is unknown. Further research about the reasons of discontinuation and the risk of negative results is needed to inform stakeholders.

摘要

目的

先进治疗医药产品(ATMPs)构成了一类创新产品,涵盖基因治疗、体细胞治疗和组织工程产品(TEP)。商业和非商业赞助商在该领域的投资不断增加,参与此类试验的ATMPs随机临床试验(RCT)数量及患者人数也在不断增长。RCT用于生成数据以证明新疗法的疗效,但RCT的终止会浪费稀缺资源。我们的目标是确定已终止的ATMPs试验的数量和特征,以评估终止率。

方法

我们使用三个数据库搜索了1999年至2015年6月期间开展的ATMPs试验,这三个数据库分别是Clinicaltrials.gov、国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)和欧盟药品监管当局临床试验(EudraCT)。在消除重复项后,我们筛选出了ATMPs试验。我们确定了疾病领域以及赞助商是商业组织还是非商业组织。我们根据类型和试验状态对ATMPs进行分类,即正在进行、已完成、已终止、已停止和提前结束。然后,我们计算了终止率。

结果

在1999年至2015年6月期间,共识别出143项已撤回、已终止或提前结束的ATMPs临床试验。在1999年至2013年6月期间,共识别出474项正在进行和已完成的临床试验。因此,ATMPs试验的终止率为23.18%,与处于研发阶段的非ATMPs药物的终止率相似。细胞治疗、基因治疗和TEP的终止概率分别为27.35%、16.28%和16.34%。终止率最高的是肿瘤学领域(43%),其次是心脏病学领域(19.2%)。商业和非商业赞助商的终止率几乎相同;因此,终止原因可能并非由财务因素驱动。

结论

目前尚无ATMPs在每个研发阶段的失败风险率。在评估预期净现值以支持投资组合仲裁时,终止率可能会有所帮助,患者和潜在研究者在决定是否参与ATMP试验时也可予以考虑。这些结果存在局限性,因为终止的理由尚不清楚。需要进一步研究终止原因以及负面结果的风险,以便为利益相关者提供信息。