Suppr超能文献

使用秒表测量阅读速度与使用自动化计算机程序(rad-rd©)测量的准确性比较。

The accuracy of reading speed measurement by stopwatch versus measurement with an automated computer program (rad-rd©).

作者信息

Radner Wolfgang, Diendorfer Gabriela, Kainrath Bettina, Kollmitzer Christian

机构信息

Austrian Academy of Opthalmology, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Phoniatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;95(2):211-216. doi: 10.1111/aos.13201. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the reading time and reading speed measurements obtained with a stopwatch with those of an automated computer program for measuring reading speed and acuity (rad-rd ; patent: AT 504635B1/10-2006).

METHODS

The rad-rd was used (in conjunction with a PC and microphone) for the computer-based measurements. In rotation, each of four examiners took a turn reading the 12 sentences from one of the four RADNER Reading Charts to three other examiners, who served as stoppers. The stoppers simultaneously measured the reading time with a stopwatch while a fifth investigator used the rad-rd to obtain computerized measurements. The stopwatch measurements were then statistically compared with the rad-rd measurements.

RESULTS

The mean reading time obtained with the stopwatch measurements was 4.34 ± 0.57 seconds (196.21 ± 21.79 wpm), versus 4.44 ± 0.59 seconds (192.24 ± 22.20 wpm) by computer measurement (r = 0.84). Of the 144 stopwatch measurements, 97 (67.36%) were shorter, and 47 (32.64%) were equal to (n = 5) or longer than the computer measurements. The mean difference for the shorter measurements was -0.17 ± 0.1 seconds (3.91% of the mean reading time), and the mean difference for the longer measurements was 0.11 ± 0.1 seconds (2.53% of the mean reading time). Most differences ranged from -0.1 to 0.1 seconds (42.36%). The results did not differ significantly among the four stoppers.

CONCLUSION

The rad-rd is an accurate, automated computer program for measuring reading time. Stopwatch measurements, although subject to inaccuracy from several sources, remain a reliable and simple method for analysis of reading performance.

摘要

目的

比较使用秒表测得的阅读时间和阅读速度与使用自动计算机程序测量阅读速度和敏锐度(rad-rd;专利:AT 504635B1/10 - 2006)所获得的结果。

方法

使用rad-rd(结合个人电脑和麦克风)进行基于计算机的测量。轮流由四名检查者中的每一位向另外三名作为计时员的检查者朗读四张RADNER阅读图表之一中的12个句子。计时员在第五名研究者使用rad-rd获取计算机测量结果的同时,用秒表同步测量阅读时间。然后对秒表测量结果与rad-rd测量结果进行统计学比较。

结果

秒表测量得到的平均阅读时间为4.34 ± 0.57秒(196.21 ± 21.79词/分钟),而计算机测量的平均阅读时间为4.44 ± 0.59秒(192.24 ± 22.20词/分钟)(r = 0.84)。在144次秒表测量中,97次(67.36%)比计算机测量结果短,47次(32.64%)与计算机测量结果相等(n = 5)或更长。较短测量结果的平均差值为 -0.17 ± 0.1秒(平均阅读时间的3.91%),较长测量结果的平均差值为0.11 ± 0.1秒(平均阅读时间的2.53%)。大多数差值在 -0.1至0.1秒之间(42.36%)。四名计时员的结果之间无显著差异。

结论

rad-rd是一种用于测量阅读时间的准确的自动化计算机程序。秒表测量虽然因多种因素存在不准确性,但仍是分析阅读表现的一种可靠且简单的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验