• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A systematic review of reading tests.阅读测试的系统评价。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 18;16(1):121-127. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.01.18. eCollection 2023.
2
Near vision examination in presbyopia patients: Do we need good homologated near vision charts?老花眼患者的近视力检查:我们是否需要优质的标准化近视力表?
Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Nov 10;3:29. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0061-7. eCollection 2016.
3
Introduction of a digital near-vision reading test for normal and low vision adults: development and validation.针对正常视力和低视力成年人的数字近视力阅读测试介绍:开发与验证
Eye Vis (Lond). 2020 Oct 22;7:51. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00216-0. eCollection 2020.
4
Reading charts in ophthalmology.眼科图表阅读
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;255(8):1465-1482. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3659-0. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
5
Development and Validation of a Web-Based Reading Test for Normal and Low Vision Patients.一种针对正常视力和低视力患者的基于网络的阅读测试的开发与验证
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 22;15:3915-3929. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S314943. eCollection 2021.
6
Standardization of Reading Charts: A Review of Recent Developments.视力检查表的标准化:近期进展综述
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Oct;96(10):768-779. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001436.
7
Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study.使用兰多尔特环校准视力表的潜在局限性:一项微观研究。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Aug 15;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5.
8
[Ophthalmological reading tests : Part 1: historical aspects].[眼科阅读测试:第1部分:历史方面]
Ophthalmologe. 2016 Nov;113(11):918-924. doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-0174-8.
9
Assessment of near visual acuity in 0-13 year olds with normal and low vision: a systematic review.对0至13岁视力正常和视力低下儿童近视力的评估:一项系统评价
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 8;16(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0386-y.
10
Intermediate addition multifocals provide safe stair ambulation with adequate 'short-term' reading.中间加光区多焦点镜片可为安全上下楼梯及进行足够的“短期”阅读提供帮助。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 Jan;36(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/opo.12236. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Case Management Intervention Combined with Physical Exercise Compared to Physical Exercise Alone in Older People with High Risk of Falls: A Protocol Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial.与单纯体育锻炼相比,病例管理干预联合体育锻炼对跌倒高危老年人的有效性:一项随机临床试验的方案研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;13(15):1814. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151814.
2
Content assessment and readability of online injury prevention resources on firearm safety: a cross-sectional analysis of hospital and national injury prevention literature.枪支安全在线伤害预防资源的内容评估与可读性:医院及国家伤害预防文献的横断面分析
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jun 22;10(2):e001665. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001665. eCollection 2025.
3
Bridging the literacy gap for surgical consents: an AI-human expert collaborative approach.弥合手术同意书的读写能力差距:一种人工智能与人类专家的协作方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 8;7(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01039-2.
4
Using meta-analysis and CNN-NLP to review and classify the medical literature for normal tissue complication probability in head and neck cancer.运用荟萃分析和 CNN-NLP 对头颈部癌症正常组织并发症概率的医学文献进行回顾和分类。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jan 9;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02381-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Multifocal and Accommodating Intraocular Lenses for the Treatment of Presbyopia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.多焦点和调节型人工晶状体治疗老视:美国眼科学会报告。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Oct;128(10):1469-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Introduction of a digital near-vision reading test for normal and low vision adults: development and validation.针对正常视力和低视力成年人的数字近视力阅读测试介绍:开发与验证
Eye Vis (Lond). 2020 Oct 22;7:51. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00216-0. eCollection 2020.
3
Standardization of Reading Charts: A Review of Recent Developments.视力检查表的标准化:近期进展综述
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Oct;96(10):768-779. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001436.
4
eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review.用于视力自测的电子健康工具:一项范围综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Aug 22;2:82. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0154-5. eCollection 2019.
5
Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Vision at Home).基于智能手机的视力测试(在家视力测试)的开发与验证
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Aug 19;8(4):27. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.4.27. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
Scoring reading parameters: An inter-rater reliability study using the MNREAD chart.评分阅读参数:使用 MNREAD 图表的观察者间信度研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 7;14(6):e0216775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216775. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparison of vision-related quality of life and mental health between congenital and acquired low-vision patients.先天性和获得性低视力患者的视力相关生活质量和心理健康比较。
Eye (Lond). 2019 Oct;33(10):1540-1546. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0439-6. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
8
Extending the MNREAD sentence corpus: Computer-generated sentences for measuring visual performance in reading.扩展MNREAD句子语料库:用于测量阅读视觉表现的计算机生成句子。
Vision Res. 2019 May;158:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
9
Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies.老花眼:矫正策略的有效性。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019 Jan;68:124-143. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
10
Methods for the study of near, intermediate vision, and accommodation: an overview of subjective and objective approaches.研究近距、中距视觉和调节的方法:主观和客观方法概述。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan-Feb;64(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

阅读测试的系统评价。

A systematic review of reading tests.

作者信息

Ntonti Panagiota, Mitsi Christina, Chatzimichael Eleftherios, Panagiotopoulou Eirini-Kanella, Bakirtzis Minas, Konstantinidis Aristeidis, Labiris Georgios

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 18;16(1):121-127. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.01.18. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.18240/ijo.2023.01.18
PMID:36659955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9815988/
Abstract

Adequate near and intermediate visual capacity is important in performing everyday tasks, especially after the introduction of smartphones and computers in our professional and recreational activities. Primary objective of this study was to review all available reading tests both conventional and digital and explore their integrated characteristics. A systematic review of the recent literature regarding reading charts was performed based on the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Springer databases between February and March 2021. Data from 11 descriptive and 24 comparative studies were included in the present systematic review. Clinical settings are still dominated by conventional printed reading charts; however, the most prevalent of them (, Jaeger type charts) are not validated. Reliable reading capacity assessment is done only by those that comply with the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) recommendations. Digital reading tests are gaining popularity both in clinical and research settings and are differentiated in standard computer-based applications that require installation either in a computer or a tablet (, Advanced VISION Test and web-based ones , Democritus Digital Acuity Reading Test requires no installation). It is evident that validated digital tests will prevail in future clinical or research settings and it is upon ophthalmologists to select the one most compatible with their examination routine.

摘要

具备足够的近视力和中视力对于完成日常任务很重要,尤其是在我们的职业和娱乐活动中引入智能手机和计算机之后。本研究的主要目的是回顾所有可用的阅读测试,包括传统测试和数字测试,并探讨它们的综合特征。基于PubMed、谷歌学术和施普林格数据库,于2021年2月至3月对近期有关阅读图表的文献进行了系统综述。本系统综述纳入了11项描述性研究和24项比较性研究的数据。临床环境仍然以传统的印刷阅读图表为主;然而,其中最常见的(如耶格图表)并未经过验证。只有符合国际眼科理事会(ICO)建议的测试才能进行可靠的阅读能力评估。数字阅读测试在临床和研究环境中越来越受欢迎,并且分为需要安装在计算机或平板电脑上的标准基于计算机的应用程序(如Advanced VISION Test)和基于网络的应用程序(如Democritus Digital Acuity Reading Test无需安装)。显然,经过验证的数字测试将在未来的临床或研究环境中占主导地位,眼科医生需要选择最符合其检查常规的测试。