Shokar Navkiran K, Byrd Theresa, Salaiz Rebekah, Flores Silvia, Chaparro Maria, Calderon-Mora Jessica, Reininger Belinda, Dwivedi Alok
Department of Family and Community Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center-El Paso, 9849 Kenworthy Street, El Paso, TX 79924, United States.
Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street STOP 9430, Lubbock, TX 79430-9430, United States.
Prev Med. 2016 Oct;91:273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.039. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA. Screening is widely recommended but underutilized, particularly among the low income, the uninsured, recent immigrants and Hispanics. The study objective was to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive community-wide, bilingual, CRC screening intervention among uninsured predominantly Hispanic individuals. This prospective study was embedded in a CRC screening program and utilized a quasi-experimental design. Recruitment occurred from Community and clinic sites. Inclusion criteria were aged 50-75years, uninsured, due for CRC screening, Texas address and exclusions were a history of CRC, or recent rectal bleeding. Eligible subjects were randomized to either promotora (P), video (V), or combined promotora and video (PV) education, and also received no-cost screening with fecal immunochemical testing or colonoscopy and navigation. The non-randomly allocated controls recruited from a similar county, received no intervention. The main outcome was 6month self-reported CRC screening. Per protocol and worst case scenario analyses, and logistic regression with covariate adjustment were performed. 784 subjects (467 in intervention group, 317 controls) were recruited; mean age was 56.8years; 78.4% were female, 98.7% were Hispanic and 90.0% were born in Mexico. In the worst case scenario analysis (n=784) screening uptake was 80.5% in the intervention group and 17.0% in the control group [relative risk 4.73, 95% CI: 3.69-6.05, P<0.001]. No educational group differences were observed. Covariate adjustment did not significantly alter the effect. A multicomponent community-wide, bilingual, CRC screening intervention significantly increased CRC screening in an uninsured predominantly Hispanic population.
结直肠癌(CRC)是美国癌症死亡的第二大主要原因。筛查虽被广泛推荐,但利用不足,在低收入人群、未参保者、新移民和西班牙裔人群中尤其如此。本研究的目的是确定一项全面的、社区范围的、双语的CRC筛查干预措施对主要为未参保西班牙裔个体的有效性。这项前瞻性研究纳入了一个CRC筛查项目,并采用了准实验设计。招募工作在社区和诊所进行。纳入标准为年龄在50 - 75岁之间、未参保、应进行CRC筛查、有德州地址,排除标准为有CRC病史或近期直肠出血。符合条件的受试者被随机分为接受促进者(P)、视频(V)或促进者与视频结合(PV)教育组,同时还接受免费的粪便免疫化学检测或结肠镜检查及导航筛查。从一个类似县招募的非随机分配对照组未接受任何干预。主要结局是6个月的自我报告CRC筛查情况。进行了符合方案分析和最坏情况分析,并进行了协变量调整的逻辑回归分析。共招募了784名受试者(干预组467名,对照组317名);平均年龄为56.8岁;78.4%为女性,98.7%为西班牙裔,90.0%出生在墨西哥。在最坏情况分析(n = 784)中,干预组的筛查接受率为80.5%,对照组为17.0%[相对风险4.73,95%置信区间:3.69 - 6.05,P < 0.001]。未观察到教育组间的差异。协变量调整并未显著改变该效应。一项多成分的、社区范围的、双语的CRC筛查干预措施显著提高了主要为未参保西班牙裔人群的CRC筛查率。