Suppr超能文献

肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征患者中患者报告结局测量的效用

The utility of patient-reported outcome measures among patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

作者信息

Murdock Kyle W, Wang Xin Shelley, Shi Qiuling, Cleeland Charles S, Fagundes Christopher P, Vernon Suzanne D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1450, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):913-921. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1406-3. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Debilitating fatigue is a core symptom of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS); however, the utility of patient-reported symptom outcome measures of fatigue for ME/CFS patients is problematic due to ceiling effects and issues with reliability and validity. We sought to evaluate the performance of three patient-reported symptom measures in a sample of ME/CFS patients and matched controls.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty ME/CFS patients and 88 age, sex, race, and zip code matched controls participated in the study. Participants completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20, DePaul Symptom Questionnaire, and RAND SF-36.

RESULTS

The general and physical fatigue subscales on Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20, as well as the role of physical health on the RAND SF-36, demonstrated questionable or unacceptable internal consistency and problematic ceiling effects. The DePaul Symptom Questionnaire demonstrated excellent internal reliability, and less than 5 % of participants were at the ceiling on each subscale. The post-exertional malaise subscale on the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire demonstrated excellent clinical utility as it was able to differentiate between ME/CFS patients and controls (OR 1.23, p < .001) and predicted ceiling effects on other patient-reported outcome subscales. A score of 20 on the post-exertional malaise subscale of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire optimally differentiated between patients and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant ceiling effects and concerns with reliability and validity were observed among Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 and RAND SF-36 subscales for ME/CFS patients. The DePaul Symptom Questionnaire addresses a number of concerns typically identified when using patient-reported outcome measures with ME/CFS patients; however, an improved multidimensional patient-reported outcome tool for measuring ME/CFS-related symptoms is warranted.

摘要

目的

使人虚弱的疲劳是肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)的核心症状;然而,由于天花板效应以及可靠性和有效性问题,患者报告的疲劳症状结局测量指标对ME/CFS患者的实用性存在问题。我们试图在一组ME/CFS患者和匹配的对照组中评估三种患者报告的症状测量指标的性能。

方法

240名ME/CFS患者以及88名年龄、性别、种族和邮政编码匹配的对照组参与了该研究。参与者完成了多维疲劳量表-20、德保罗症状问卷和兰德36项健康调查简表。

结果

多维疲劳量表-20的总体和身体疲劳分量表,以及兰德36项健康调查简表中身体健康方面的内容,显示出可疑或不可接受的内部一致性以及有问题的天花板效应。德保罗症状问卷显示出出色的内部可靠性,每个分量表上不到5%的参与者达到了上限。德保罗症状问卷的运动后不适分量表显示出出色的临床实用性,因为它能够区分ME/CFS患者和对照组(比值比1.23,p<0.001),并预测其他患者报告结局分量表的天花板效应。德保罗症状问卷运动后不适分量表得分为20时,能最佳地区分患者和对照组。

结论

在ME/CFS患者中,多维疲劳量表-20和兰德36项健康调查简表的分量表存在显著的天花板效应以及可靠性和有效性方面的问题。德保罗症状问卷解决了在对ME/CFS患者使用患者报告结局测量指标时通常发现的一些问题;然而,仍需要一种改进的多维患者报告结局工具来测量与ME/CFS相关的症状。

相似文献

4
Problems in defining post-exertional malaise.定义运动后不适的问题。
J Prev Interv Community. 2015;43(1):20-31. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2014.973239.
5
Test-Retest Reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire.德保罗症状问卷的重测信度
Fatigue. 2015 Jan 1;3(1):16-32. doi: 10.1080/21641846.2014.978110. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Test-Retest Reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire.德保罗症状问卷的重测信度
Fatigue. 2015 Jan 1;3(1):16-32. doi: 10.1080/21641846.2014.978110. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验