Deng Yanhe, Yan Mengge, Chen Henry, Sun Xin, Zhang Peng, Zeng Xianglong, Liu Xiangping, Lye Yue
Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University Beijing, China.
The International Focusing Institute, Nyack NY, USA.
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 25;7:1269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01269. eCollection 2016.
Highly optimistic explanatory style (HOES) and highly pessimistic explanatory style (HPES) are two maladaptive ways to explain the world and may have roots in attachment insecurity. The current study aims to explore the effects of security priming - activating supportive representations of attachment security - on ameliorating these maladaptive explanatory styles. 57 participants with HOES and 57 participants with HPES were randomized into security priming and control conditions. Their scores of overall optimistic attribution were measured before and after priming. Security priming had a moderating effect: the security primed HOES group exhibited lower optimistic attribution, while the security primed HPES group evinced higher scores of optimistic attribution. Furthermore, the security primed HOES group attributed positive outcomes more externally, while the security primed HPES group attributed successful results more internally. The results support the application of security priming interventions on maladaptive explanatory styles. Its potential mechanism and directions for future study are also discussed.
高度乐观解释风格(HOES)和高度悲观解释风格(HPES)是两种解释世界的适应不良方式,可能源于依恋不安全感。本研究旨在探讨安全启动——激活依恋安全的支持性表征——对改善这些适应不良解释风格的影响。57名具有HOES的参与者和57名具有HPES的参与者被随机分为安全启动组和对照组。在启动前后测量他们的总体乐观归因得分。安全启动具有调节作用:安全启动的HOES组表现出较低的乐观归因,而安全启动的HPES组表现出较高的乐观归因得分。此外,安全启动的HOES组将积极结果更多地归因于外部,而安全启动的HPES组将成功结果更多地归因于内部。结果支持将安全启动干预应用于适应不良解释风格。还讨论了其潜在机制和未来研究方向。