Suppr超能文献

使用皮质骨轨迹的微创腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定术——一项关于术后疼痛结果的前瞻性队列研究

Minimally Invasive Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Cortical Bone Trajectory - A Prospective Cohort Study on Postoperative Pain Outcomes.

作者信息

Chen Yi-Ren, Deb Sayantan, Pham Lan, Singh Harminder

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center.

Medical School, Stanford University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Cureus. 2016 Jul 26;8(7):e714. doi: 10.7759/cureus.714.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cortical screws in regards to postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw fixation is the current mainstay technique for posterior spinal fusion. Over the past decade, a new technique called cortical screw fixation has been developed, which allows for medialized screw placement through stronger cortical bone. There have been several studies that showed either biomechanical equivalence or superiority of cortical screws. However, there is currently only a single study in the literature looking at clinical outcomes of cortical screw fixation in patients who have had no prior spine surgery.

METHODS

We prospectively looked at the senior author's patients who underwent cortical versus pedicle lumbar screw fixation surgeries between 2013 and 2015 for lumbar degenerative disease. Eighteen patients underwent cortical screw fixation, and 15 patients underwent traditional pedicle screw fixation. We looked at immediate postoperative pain, changes in short-term pain (six to 12 weeks post-surgery), and changes in long-term pain (six to eight months). All pain outcomes were measured using a visual analog scale ranging from 1 to 10. Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to measure continuous data, and the Fisher Exact test was used to measure categorical data as appropriate.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the cortical screw cohort showed a trend towards having less peak postoperative pain (p = 0.09). The average postoperative pain was similar between the two cohorts (p = 0.93). There was also no difference in pain six to 12 weeks after surgery (p = 0.8). However, at six to eight months, the cortical screw cohort had worse pain compared to the pedicle screw cohort (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The cortical screw patients showed a trend towards less peak pain in the short-term (one to three days post-surgery) and more pain in the long-term (six to eight months post-surgery) compared to pedicle screw patients. Both cohorts had a statistically significant reduction in pain levels compared to preoperative pain. More studies are needed to further evaluate postoperative pain, long-term functional outcomes, and fusion rates in patients who undergo cortical screw fixation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估皮质骨螺钉在术后疼痛方面的临床疗效。

背景

椎弓根螺钉固定是目前后路脊柱融合的主要技术。在过去十年中,一种名为皮质骨螺钉固定的新技术被开发出来,它允许通过更强的皮质骨进行螺钉向内侧放置。有几项研究表明皮质骨螺钉在生物力学上等效或更具优势。然而,目前文献中仅有一项研究关注未曾接受过脊柱手术患者的皮质骨螺钉固定的临床疗效。

方法

我们前瞻性地观察了2013年至2015年间因腰椎退行性疾病接受皮质骨螺钉与椎弓根螺钉腰椎固定手术的资深作者的患者。18例患者接受皮质骨螺钉固定,15例患者接受传统椎弓根螺钉固定。我们观察了术后即刻疼痛、短期疼痛(术后6至12周)的变化以及长期疼痛(术后6至8个月)的变化。所有疼痛结果均使用1至10的视觉模拟量表进行测量。曼-惠特尼或克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验用于测量连续数据,费舍尔精确检验用于在适当情况下测量分类数据。

结果

我们的结果表明,皮质骨螺钉组术后疼痛峰值有降低趋势(p = 0.09)。两组术后平均疼痛程度相似(p = 0.93)。术后6至12周疼痛也无差异(p = 0.8)。然而,在术后6至8个月,皮质骨螺钉组比椎弓根螺钉组疼痛更严重(p = 0.02)。

结论

与椎弓根螺钉患者相比,皮质骨螺钉患者在短期(术后1至3天)疼痛峰值有降低趋势,而在长期(术后6至8个月)疼痛更严重。与术前疼痛相比,两组患者的疼痛水平均有统计学显著降低。需要更多研究来进一步评估接受皮质骨螺钉固定患者的术后疼痛、长期功能结果和融合率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37cc/5001953/4c53fb1890fb/cureus-0008-000000000714-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验