• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱椎间融合器的进展

Advances in Spinal Interbody Cages.

作者信息

Jain Sukrit, Eltorai Adam E M, Ruttiman Roy, Daniels Alan H

机构信息

Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug;8(3):278-84. doi: 10.1111/os.12264.

DOI:10.1111/os.12264
PMID:27627709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6584167/
Abstract

Since the late 1980s, spinal interbody cages (ICs) have been used to aid bone fusion in a variety of spinal disorders. Utilized to restore intervertebral height, enable bone graft containment for arthrodesis, and restore anterior column biomechanical stability, ICs have since evolved to become a highly successful means of achieving fusion, being associated with less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, fewer complications and higher rates of fusion when than bone graft only spinal fusion. IC design and materials have changed considerably over the past two decades. The threaded titanium-alloy cylindrical screw cages, typically filled with autologous bone graft, of the mid-1990s achieved greater fusion rates than bone grafts and non-threaded cages. Threaded screw cages, however, were soon found to be less stable in extension and flexion; additionally, they had a high incidence of cage subsidence. As of the early 2000s, non-threaded box-shaped titanium or polyether ether ketone IC designs have become increasingly more common. This modern design continues to achieve greater cage stability in flexion, axial rotation and bending. However, cage stability and subsidence, bone fusion rates and surgical complications still require optimization. Thus, this review provides an update of recent research findings relevant to ICs over the past 3 years, highlighting trends in optimization of cage design, materials, alternatives to bone grafts, and coatings that may enhance fusion.

摘要

自20世纪80年代末以来,脊柱椎间融合器(ICs)已被用于辅助多种脊柱疾病的骨融合。ICs用于恢复椎间高度,为关节融合提供植骨空间,并恢复前柱生物力学稳定性,此后已发展成为一种非常成功的实现融合的方法,与单纯植骨脊柱融合相比,术后疼痛更少、住院时间更短、并发症更少且融合率更高。在过去二十年中,IC的设计和材料发生了很大变化。20世纪90年代中期的带螺纹钛合金圆柱形螺钉融合器,通常填充自体骨移植材料,其融合率高于骨移植和无螺纹融合器。然而,带螺纹的螺钉融合器很快被发现屈伸稳定性较差;此外,融合器下沉的发生率很高。到21世纪初,无螺纹的盒形钛或聚醚醚酮IC设计越来越普遍。这种现代设计在屈伸、轴向旋转和弯曲时仍能保持更高的融合器稳定性。然而,融合器稳定性和下沉、骨融合率以及手术并发症仍需优化。因此,本综述提供了过去3年与ICs相关的最新研究结果,重点介绍了融合器设计、材料、骨移植替代物以及可能增强融合的涂层优化方面的趋势。

相似文献

1
Advances in Spinal Interbody Cages.脊柱椎间融合器的进展
Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug;8(3):278-84. doi: 10.1111/os.12264.
2
Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model.椎间融合器设计对绵羊颈椎模型椎间融合的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2002 Apr;96(3 Suppl):321-32. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.96.3.0321.
3
Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.羊颈椎融合模型中的生物可吸收椎间融合器
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 1;29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137060.79732.78.
4
Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.颈椎椎间融合器的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1850-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00007.
5
Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads.补充经椎板小关节螺钉固定对生理压缩预负荷下单节段前路腰椎椎间融合器稳定性的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Aug 15;29(16):1731-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000134570.08901.30.
6
Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants.腰椎后路椎间融合器的节段稳定性和抗压强度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Aug 1;25(15):1899-907. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00007.
7
The effect of interbody fusion cage design on the stability of the instrumented spine in response to cyclic loading: an experimental study.椎间融合 cage 设计对脊柱内固定节段在循环加载下稳定性的影响:一项实验研究。
Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1867-1876. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
[Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part I: Effect of cage design on interbody fusion].[绵羊颈椎的实验性融合。第一部分:椎间融合器设计对椎间融合的影响]
Chirurg. 2002 Sep;73(9):909-17. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0489-2.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.独立式聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与一体式螺钉的生物力学评估。
Spine J. 2013 Jan;13(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
10
Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.使用锥形或圆柱形椎间融合器进行前路椎间融合术后腰椎椎间孔的变化。
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.019. Epub 2007 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages.探索3D打印氮化硅-聚醚醚酮复合材料在颈椎椎间融合器中的机械强度、抗菌性能和生物活性。
Int J Bioprint. 2024;10(2). doi: 10.36922/ijb.2124. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
Application of Biocomposite Hydrogel With Developed Trabecular Cage in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Clinical Case Report.生物复合水凝胶与发育性小梁骨笼在腰椎椎间融合中的应用:一例临床病例报告
Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2025 Aug 15;18:11795476251357427. doi: 10.1177/11795476251357427. eCollection 2025.
3
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion implants: a narrative review of current trends and future directions.腰椎前路椎间融合植入物:当前趋势与未来方向的叙述性综述
J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 27;11(2):328-338. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-114. Epub 2025 May 6.
4
The modern application of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a narrative review of perioperative considerations and surgical pearls.腰椎前路椎间融合术(ALIF)的现代应用:围手术期注意事项及手术要点的叙述性综述
J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 24;11(1):148-165. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-85. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
5
Surgical Stabilization of the Spine: A Clinical Review of Spinal Fractures, Spondylolisthesis, and Instrumentation Methods.脊柱的手术稳定:脊柱骨折、脊椎滑脱及内固定方法的临床综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 10;14(4):1124. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041124.
6
Comparing Lumbar Spine Cages and Bone Grafts in Spinal Arthrodesis: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.腰椎椎间融合器与植骨在脊柱融合术中的比较:临床结果的Meta分析
Cureus. 2025 Jan 6;17(1):e77017. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77017. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
A novel porous interbody fusion cage modified by microarc oxidation and hydrothermal treatment technology accelerate osseointegration and spinal fusion in sheep.一种采用微弧氧化和水热处理技术改性的新型多孔椎间融合器可加速绵羊的骨整合和脊柱融合。
RSC Adv. 2024 Oct 9;14(44):31966-31978. doi: 10.1039/d3ra08185k.
8
Biomedical Applications of Titanium Alloys: A Comprehensive Review.钛合金的生物医学应用:综述
Materials (Basel). 2023 Dec 25;17(1):114. doi: 10.3390/ma17010114.
9
Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.腰椎椎间融合器材料与设计的创新进展:一篇全面的叙述性综述
Asian Spine J. 2024 Jun;18(3):444-457. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0407. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
10
The influence of over-distraction on biomechanical response of cervical spine post anterior interbody fusion: a comprehensive finite element study.过度撑开对颈椎前路椎间融合术后生物力学响应的影响:一项全面的有限元研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 15;11:1217274. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217274. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Computational analyses of different intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion.用于腰椎融合的不同椎间融合器的计算分析。
J Biomech. 2015 Sep 18;48(12):3274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
2
A preclinical large animal study on a novel intervertebral fusion cage covered with high porosity titanium sheets with a triple pore structure used for spinal fusion.一项关于一种新型椎间融合器的临床前大型动物研究,该融合器覆盖有具有三重孔隙结构的高孔隙率钛板,用于脊柱融合。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2530-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4047-2. Epub 2015 May 31.
3
The design evolution of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中椎间融合器的设计演变:一项系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 25;16:99. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0546-x.
4
The controversy surrounding bone morphogenetic proteins in the spine: a review of current research.脊柱中骨形态发生蛋白的争议:当前研究综述
Yale J Biol Med. 2014 Dec 12;87(4):549-61. eCollection 2014 Dec.
5
Biomechanical evaluation and surface characterization of a nano-modified surface on PEEK implants: a study in the rabbit tibia.聚醚醚酮(PEEK)植入物纳米改性表面的生物力学评估及表面特性研究:一项在兔胫骨上的研究
Int J Nanomedicine. 2014 Aug 14;9:3903-11. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S60387. eCollection 2014.
6
Segmental kyphosis after cervical interbody fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a comparative study on 2 different PEEK cages.采用独立聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器进行颈椎椎间融合术后的节段性后凸:两种不同PEEK椎间融合器的比较研究
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Feb;28(1):E17-24. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000137.
7
Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.使用聚醚醚酮椎间融合器或钛椎间融合器并结合椎弓根内固定的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后融合率的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2150-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3466-9. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
8
Bioabsorbable interbody magnesium-polymer cage: degradation kinetics, biomechanical stiffness, and histological findings from an ovine cervical spine fusion model.可生物吸收椎间融合镁聚合物椎间融合器:来自绵羊颈椎融合模型的降解动力学、生物力学刚度和组织学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Sep 15;39(20):E1220-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000507.
9
Biomechanical assessment of anchored cervical interbody cages: comparison of 2-screw and 4-screw designs.锚定式颈椎椎间融合器的生物力学评估:双螺钉和四螺钉设计的比较。
Neurosurgery. 2014 Sep;10 Suppl 3:412-7; discussion 417. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000351.
10
The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol.SNAP试验:一项针对有症状的退行性腰椎间盘疾病患者进行的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中氮化硅与聚醚醚酮椎间融合器对比的双盲多中心随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Feb 25;15:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-57.