• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FARNet 神经网络算法能否准确识别后前头颅定位标志点?

Does the FARNet neural network algorithm accurately identify Posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks?

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01478-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01478-z
PMID:39478475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526671/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We explored whether the feature aggregation and refinement network (FARNet) algorithm accurately identified posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric landmarks.

METHODS

We identified 47 landmarks on 1,431 PA cephalograms of which 1,177 were used for training, 117 for validation, and 137 for testing. A FARNet-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm automatically detected the landmarks. Model effectiveness was calculated by deriving the mean radial error (MRE) and the successful detection rates (SDRs) within 2, 2.5, 3, and 4 mm. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed on the Euclidean differences between repeated manual identifications and AI trials. The direction in differences was analyzed, and whether differences moved in the same or opposite directions relative to ground truth on both the x and y-axis.

RESULTS

The AI system (web-based CranioCatch annotation software (Eskişehir, Turkey)) identified 47 anatomical landmarks in PA cephalograms. The right gonion SDRs were the highest, thus 96.4, 97.8, 100, and 100% within 2, 2.5, 3, and 4 mm, respectively. The right gonion MRE was 0.94 ± 0.53 mm. The right condylon SDRs were the lowest, thus 32.8, 45.3, 54.0, and 67.9% within the same thresholds. The right condylon MRE was 3.31 ± 2.25 mm. The AI model's reliability and accuracy were similar to a human expert's. AI was better at four skeleton points than the expert, whereas the expert was better at one skeletal and seven dental points (P < 0.05). Most of the points exhibited significant deviations along the y-axis. Compared to ground truth, most of the points in AI and the second trial showed opposite movement on the x-axis and the same on the y-axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The FARNet algorithm streamlined orthodontic diagnosis.

摘要

背景

我们探讨了特征聚合和细化网络(FARNet)算法是否能准确识别前后位(PA)头影测量标志点。

方法

我们在 1431 张 PA 头影片中识别出 47 个标志点,其中 1177 个用于训练,117 个用于验证,137 个用于测试。基于 FARNet 的人工智能(AI)算法自动检测标志点。通过计算 2、2.5、3 和 4 mm 内的平均放射状误差(MRE)和成功检测率(SDR)来评估模型的有效性。对重复手动识别和 AI 试验之间的欧几里得差异进行曼-惠特尼 U 检验。分析差异的方向,以及差异在 x 和 y 轴上相对于真实值是朝同一方向还是相反方向移动。

结果

AI 系统(基于网络的 CranioCatch 注释软件(土耳其埃斯基谢希尔))在 PA 头影片中识别出 47 个解剖标志点。右侧髁突的 SDR 最高,分别为 96.4、97.8、100 和 100%,在 2、2.5、3 和 4 mm 内。右侧髁突的 MRE 为 0.94±0.53 mm。右侧髁突的 SDR 最低,分别为 32.8、45.3、54.0 和 67.9%,在相同阈值内。右侧髁突的 MRE 为 3.31±2.25 mm。AI 模型的可靠性和准确性与人类专家相似。AI 在四个骨骼点上优于专家,而专家在一个骨骼点和七个牙齿点上优于 AI(P<0.05)。大多数点在 y 轴上表现出显著的偏差。与真实值相比,AI 和第二次试验中的大多数点在 x 轴上表现出相反的运动,而在 y 轴上则表现出相同的运动。

结论

FARNet 算法简化了正畸诊断。

相似文献

1
Does the FARNet neural network algorithm accurately identify Posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks?FARNet 神经网络算法能否准确识别后前头颅定位标志点?
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01478-z.
2
Automatic identification of posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using a novel deep learning algorithm: a comparative study with human experts.利用新型深度学习算法自动识别前后位头颅测量标志点:与人类专家的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 19;13(1):15506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42870-z.
3
Accuracy of auto-identification of the posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using cascade convolution neural network algorithm and cephalometric images of different quality from nationwide multiple centers.使用级联卷积神经网络算法和来自全国多个中心的不同质量的头影测量图像对头影测量后前位标志点进行自动识别的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Apr;161(4):e361-e371. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.11.011. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
4
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:自动识别头影测量标志点:
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):69-76. doi: 10.2319/022019-129.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
5
Evaluation of a multi-stage convolutional neural network-based fully automated landmark identification system using cone-beam computed tomographysynthesized posteroanterior cephalometric images.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描合成的后前位头影测量图像评估基于多阶段卷积神经网络的全自动地标识别系统。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Mar 25;51(2):77-85. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.77.
6
Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network- Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection.基于卷积神经网络的人工智能算法用于自动头影测量标志点检测的性能
Turk J Orthod. 2022 Jun;35(2):94-100. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.22026.
7
Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工智能在头影测量标志点检测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Digit Imaging. 2023 Jun;36(3):1158-1179. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00766-w. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
8
Orthodontic treatment outcome predictive performance differences between artificial intelligence and conventional methods.正畸治疗结果预测性能的人工智能与传统方法比较。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Sep 1;94(5):557-565. doi: 10.2319/111823-767.1.
9
Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?基于人工智能的自动头影测量软件在标志点识别方面优于正畸专家吗?
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 8;23(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03188-4.
10
Does artificial intelligence predict orthognathic surgical outcomes better than conventional linear regression methods?人工智能预测正颌手术结果是否优于传统线性回归方法?
Angle Orthod. 2024 Sep 1;94(5):549-556. doi: 10.2319/111423-756.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of the relationship between the mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve using posteroanterior radiographs: a pilot study.应用后前位曲面体层片研究下颌第三磨牙与下牙槽神经的关系:一项初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04123-x.
2
Automatic identification of posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using a novel deep learning algorithm: a comparative study with human experts.利用新型深度学习算法自动识别前后位头颅测量标志点:与人类专家的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 19;13(1):15506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42870-z.
3
Influence of growth structures and fixed appliances on automated cephalometric landmark recognition with a customized convolutional neural network.
生长结构和固定矫治器对定制卷积神经网络自动头影测量标志点识别的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 10;23(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02984-2.
4
Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工智能在头影测量标志点检测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Digit Imaging. 2023 Jun;36(3):1158-1179. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00766-w. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Feature Aggregation and Refinement Network for 2D Anatomical Landmark Detection.二维解剖地标检测的特征聚合与细化网络。
J Digit Imaging. 2023 Apr;36(2):547-561. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00718-4. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Creation of Digital Virtual Patient by Integrating CBCT, Intraoral Scan, 3D Facial Scan: An Approach to Methodology for Integration Accuracy.通过整合锥形束 CT、口内扫描、3D 面部扫描创建数字虚拟患者:一种集成准确性方法的探讨。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Jun 1;33(4):e396-e398. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008275. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network- Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection.基于卷积神经网络的人工智能算法用于自动头影测量标志点检测的性能
Turk J Orthod. 2022 Jun;35(2):94-100. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.22026.
8
Cephalometric Analysis in Orthodontics Using Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review.口腔正畸学中的人工智能头影测量分析——全面综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 16;2022:1880113. doi: 10.1155/2022/1880113. eCollection 2022.
9
Accuracy of auto-identification of the posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using cascade convolution neural network algorithm and cephalometric images of different quality from nationwide multiple centers.使用级联卷积神经网络算法和来自全国多个中心的不同质量的头影测量图像对头影测量后前位标志点进行自动识别的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Apr;161(4):e361-e371. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.11.011. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
10
Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review.人工智能和机器学习在口腔正畸学中的应用:范围综述。
Prog Orthod. 2021 Jul 5;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00361-9.