Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki
Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Sep 22;13:34. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.34. eCollection 2016.
The aim of this systematic review was to find best teaching strategies for teaching evidence-based practice (EBP) to undergraduate health students that have been adopted over the last years in healthcare institutions worldwide.
The authors carried out a systematic, comprehensive bibliographic search using Medline database for the years 2005 to March 2015 (updated in March 2016). Search terms used were chosen from the USNLM Institutes of Health list of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and free text key terms were used as well. Selected articles were measured based on the inclusion criteria of this study and initially compared in terms of titles or abstracts. Finally, articles relevant to the subject of this review were retrieved in full text. Critical appraisal was done to determine the effects of strategy of teaching evidence-based medicine (EBM).
Twenty articles were included in the review. The majority of the studies sampled medical students (n=13) and only few conducted among nursing (n=2), pharmacy (n=2), physiotherapy/therapy (n=1), dentistry (n=1), or mixed disciplines (n=1) students. Studies evaluated a variety of educational interventions of varying duration, frequency and format (lectures, tutorials, workshops, conferences, journal clubs, and online sessions), or combination of these to teach EBP. We categorized interventions into single interventions covering a workshop, conference, lecture, journal club, or e-learning and multifaceted interventions where a combination of strategies had been assessed. Seven studies reported an overall increase to all EBP domains indicating a higher EBP competence and two studies focused on the searching databases skill.
Followings were deduced from above analysis: multifaceted approach may be best suited when teaching EBM to health students; the use of technology to promote EBP through mobile devices, simulation, and the web is on the rise; and the duration of the interventions varying form some hours to even months was not related to the students' EBP competence.
本系统评价的目的是找出过去几年在全球医疗机构中采用的、针对本科健康专业学生进行循证实践(EBP)教学的最佳教学策略。
作者使用Medline数据库对2005年至2015年3月(2016年3月更新)进行了系统、全面的文献检索。所使用的检索词选自美国国立医学图书馆(USNLM)国立卫生研究院的医学主题词表(MeSH),同时也使用了自由文本关键词。根据本研究的纳入标准对所选文章进行衡量,并首先根据标题或摘要进行比较。最后,检索与本综述主题相关的文章全文。进行批判性评价以确定循证医学(EBM)教学策略的效果。
本综述纳入了20篇文章。大多数研究以医学生为样本(n = 13),只有少数研究在护理专业学生(n = 2)、药学专业学生(n = 2)、物理治疗/治疗专业学生(n = 1)、牙科专业学生(n = 1)或多学科专业学生(n = 1)中进行。研究评估了各种持续时间、频率和形式(讲座、辅导课、工作坊、会议、期刊俱乐部和在线课程)的教育干预措施,或这些措施的组合来教授EBP。我们将干预措施分为涵盖工作坊、会议、讲座、期刊俱乐部或电子学习的单一干预措施,以及评估了多种策略组合的多方面干预措施。七项研究报告称,所有EBP领域总体上有所提高,表明EBP能力有所增强,两项研究侧重于搜索数据库技能。
从上述分析中得出以下结论:在向健康专业学生教授EBM时,多方面方法可能最适合;通过移动设备、模拟和网络利用技术促进EBP的情况正在增加;干预措施的持续时间从数小时到数月不等,这与学生的EBP能力无关。