• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享注意力的传播及其对政治说服的影响。

The broadcast of shared attention and its impact on political persuasion.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee.

School of Journalism and Electronic Media, University of Tennessee.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):665-673. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000065. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1037/pspa0000065
PMID:27657306
Abstract

In democracies where multitudes yield political influence, so does broadcast media that reaches those multitudes. However, broadcast media may not be powerful simply because it reaches a certain audience, but because each of the recipients is aware of that fact. That is, watching broadcast media can evoke a state of shared attention, or the perception of simultaneous coattention with others. Whereas past research has investigated the effects of shared attention with a few socially close others (i.e., friends, acquaintances, minimal ingroup members), we examine the impact of shared attention with a multitude of unfamiliar others in the context of televised broadcasting. In this paper, we explore whether shared attention increases the psychological impact of televised political speeches, and whether fewer numbers of coattending others diminishes this effect. Five studies investigate whether the perception of simultaneous coattention, or shared attention, on a mass broadcasted political speech leads to more extreme judgments. The results indicate that the perception of synchronous coattention (as compared with coattending asynchronously and attending alone) renders persuasive speeches more persuasive, and unpersuasive speeches more unpersuasive. We also find that recall memory for the content of the speech mediates the effect of shared attention on political persuasion. The results are consistent with the notion that shared attention on mass broadcasted information results in deeper processing of the content, rendering judgments more extreme. In all, our findings imply that shared attention is a cognitive capacity that supports large-scale social coordination, where multitudes of people can cognitively prioritize simultaneously coattended information. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

在民主国家,民众的数量会影响政治影响力,同样,能够覆盖这些民众的广播媒体也会产生影响。然而,广播媒体的影响力可能不仅仅在于其受众规模,还在于每个接收者都意识到这一事实。也就是说,观看广播媒体可以唤起一种共同关注的状态,或者是与他人同时关注的感觉。虽然过去的研究已经调查了与少数几个社交关系密切的人(例如朋友、熟人、最小的内群体成员)共享注意力的影响,但我们在电视广播的背景下,研究了与众多陌生他人共享注意力的影响。在本文中,我们探讨了共享注意力是否会增加电视政治演讲的心理影响,以及较少数量的共同关注者是否会减弱这种影响。五项研究调查了在大规模广播政治演讲中,共同关注的感知(即同步共同关注)是否会导致更极端的判断。结果表明,同步共同关注的感知(与共同异步关注和单独关注相比)会使有说服力的演讲更有说服力,没有说服力的演讲更没有说服力。我们还发现,对演讲内容的回忆记忆在共同关注对政治说服的影响中起中介作用。这些结果与这样一种观点一致,即对大规模广播信息的共同关注会导致对内容的更深入处理,从而使判断更加极端。总之,我们的发现意味着共同关注是一种认知能力,支持大规模的社会协调,使众多人能够同时关注共同关注的信息。

相似文献

1
The broadcast of shared attention and its impact on political persuasion.共享注意力的传播及其对政治说服的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):665-673. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000065. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
Engaged listeners: shared neural processing of powerful political speeches.投入的听众:有力政治演讲的共同神经处理。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Aug;10(8):1137-43. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu168. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
3
Historical Change in the Moral Foundations of Political Persuasion.政治说服的道德基础的历史变迁。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Nov;46(11):1523-1537. doi: 10.1177/0146167220907467. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
4
The discrepancy in the perception of the public-political speech in Croatia.克罗地亚公众对政治演讲认知上的差异。
Coll Antropol. 2014 Mar;38(1):297-304.
5
The paradox of the modern mass media: probably the major source of social cohesion in liberal democracies, even though its content is often socially divisive.现代大众媒体的悖论:它可能是自由民主国家社会凝聚力的主要来源,尽管其内容往往会造成社会分裂。
Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(2):205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
6
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief.《党派大脑:基于身份认同的政治信仰模式》
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;22(3):213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
7
Convincing similar and dissimilar others: the power of language abstraction in political communication.说服相似和不相似的他人:政治传播中语言抽象的力量。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 May;39(5):596-607. doi: 10.1177/0146167213479404. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
8
Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls.国会议员在在线市政厅会议中进行实质性、归因性和行为说服的实地实验证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 31;112(13):3937-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418188112. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
Social influence in televised election debates: a potential distortion of democracy.电视选战辩论中的社会影响:民主的潜在扭曲。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e18154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018154.
10
Me, us, or them: who is more conformist? Perception of conformity and political orientation.我、我们还是他们:谁更墨守成规?对从众的认知与政治取向。
J Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;148(3):335-45. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.3.335-346.

引用本文的文献

1
A preliminary EEG study on persuasive communication towards groupness.一项关于群体说服力沟通的脑电图初步研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):6242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90301-y.
2
Effects of a US Supreme Court ruling to restrict abortion rights.美国最高法院限制堕胎权裁决的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jan;8(1):63-71. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01708-4. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
3
Physical but not virtual presence of others potentiates implicit and explicit learning.他人的身体存在而非虚拟存在能增强内隐和外显学习。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 8;12(1):21205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25273-4.
4
Beauty and Uncertainty as Transformative Factors: A Free Energy Principle Account of Aesthetic Diagnosis and Intervention in Gestalt Psychotherapy.美与不确定性作为变革性因素:格式塔心理治疗中审美诊断与干预的自由能原理阐释
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 13;16:906188. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.906188. eCollection 2022.