• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者报告称,在进行直接面向消费者的个人基因检测后,他们对自身基因知识的信心有所下降。

Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.

作者信息

Carere Deanna Alexis, Kraft Peter, Kaphingst Kimberly A, Roberts J Scott, Green Robert C

机构信息

Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):65-72. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.34. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2015.34
PMID:25812042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4583799/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to measure changes to genetics knowledge and self-efficacy following personal genomic testing (PGT).

METHODS

New customers of 23andMe and Pathway Genomics completed a series of online surveys. We measured genetics knowledge (nine true/false items) and genetics self-efficacy (five Likert-scale items) before receipt of results and 6 months after results and used paired methods to evaluate change over time. Correlates of change (e.g., decision regret) were identified using linear regression.

RESULTS

998 PGT customers (59.9% female; 85.8% White; mean age 46.9 ± 15.5 years) were included in our analyses. Mean genetics knowledge score was 8.15 ± 0.95 (out of 9) at baseline and 8.25 ± 0.92 at 6 months (P = 0.0024). Mean self-efficacy score was 29.06 ± 5.59 (out of 35) at baseline and 27.7 ± 5.46 at 6 months (P < 0.0001); on each item, 30-45% of participants reported lower self-efficacy following PGT. Change in self-efficacy was positively associated with health-care provider consultation (P = 0.0042), impact of PGT on perceived control over one's health (P < 0.0001), and perceived value of PGT (P < 0.0001) and was negatively associated with decision regret (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Lowered genetics self-efficacy following PGT may reflect an appropriate reevaluation by consumers in response to receiving complex genetic information.Genet Med 18 1, 65-72.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测量个人基因组检测(PGT)后遗传学知识和自我效能感的变化。

方法

23andMe和Pathway Genomics的新客户完成了一系列在线调查。我们在收到检测结果前和结果出来6个月后测量了遗传学知识(9个是非题)和遗传学自我效能感(5个李克特量表项目),并使用配对方法评估随时间的变化。使用线性回归确定变化的相关因素(如决策后悔)。

结果

998名PGT客户(59.9%为女性;85.8%为白人;平均年龄46.9±15.5岁)纳入我们的分析。基线时遗传学知识平均得分8.15±0.95(满分9分),6个月时为8.25±0.92(P = 0.0024)。基线时自我效能感平均得分29.06±5.59(满分35分),6个月时为27.7±5.46(P < 0.0001);在每个项目上,30 - 45%的参与者报告PGT后自我效能感降低。自我效能感的变化与医疗保健提供者咨询呈正相关(P = 0.0042)、PGT对感知健康控制的影响呈正相关(P < 0.0001)以及PGT的感知价值呈正相关(P < 0.0001),与决策后悔呈负相关(P < 0.0001)。

结论

PGT后遗传学自我效能感降低可能反映了消费者在收到复杂遗传信息后进行的适当重新评估。《遗传医学》18卷1期,65 - 72页。

相似文献

1
Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.消费者报告称,在进行直接面向消费者的个人基因检测后,他们对自身基因知识的信心有所下降。
Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):65-72. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.34. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
2
Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测后的处方药变化:个人基因组学(PGen)研究的影响结果。
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):537-545. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.141. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
3
Personal Genomic Testing for Cancer Risk: Results From the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.癌症风险的个人基因组检测:来自个人基因组学研究影响的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):636-644. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1503. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
4
Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测后的饮食和运动变化。
BMC Med Genomics. 2017 May 2;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0258-1.
5
The impact of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing on perceived risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer: findings from the PGen study.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测对乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌感知风险的影响:PGen研究结果
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Oct 15;8:63. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0140-y.
6
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.直接面向消费者的基因检测:用户动机、决策过程及对检测结果的感知效用
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000455006. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.从期望到体验:个人基因组测试中的消费者自主性和选择。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):63-76. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1701583. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
8
Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.直接面向消费者的基因检测后遗传咨询的应用:个人基因组学(PGen)研究的影响结果
J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1270-1279. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0106-7. Epub 2017 May 16.
9
Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.消费者对直接面向消费者的个人基因组测试后与初级保健提供者互动的看法。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):513-22. doi: 10.7326/M15-0995. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
10
Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.澳大利亚人对围绕个人基因检测使用的支持的看法:来自Genioz研究的结果。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental Communication With their Children about Cancer Risk and DTC Cascade Genetic Testing: Implications for Genetic Education and Counseling.父母与子女就癌症风险及直接面向消费者的级联基因检测进行的沟通:对基因教育与咨询的启示
Am J Med Genet A. 2025 Sep;197(9):e64115. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.64115. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Developing a questionnaire to explore lay people's preferences for communicating hereditary conditions within families: insights from a cognitive interview study.编制一份问卷以探究非专业人士在家庭内部交流遗传疾病方面的偏好:认知访谈研究的见解
J Community Genet. 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00783-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers.Impact of Personal Genomics(PGen)研究的设计、方法和参与者特征,这是一项针对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测客户的前瞻性队列研究。
Genome Med. 2014 Dec 3;6(12):96. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0096-0. eCollection 2014.
2
Caregivers' health literacy and gaps in children's Medicaid enrollment: findings from the Carolina Oral Health Literacy Study.照顾者的健康素养与儿童医疗补助登记方面的差距:来自卡罗莱纳口腔健康素养研究的结果
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 10;9(10):e110178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110178. eCollection 2014.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of nutrigenomics and personalized nutrition-related knowledge, attitude, and behavior questionnaire in dietetic students and professionals.
营养基因组学与个性化营养相关知识、态度和行为问卷在营养学学生和专业人员中的开发与心理测量学评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31785. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82080-9.
4
Psychosocial barriers and facilitators for cascade genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a scoping review.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌级联基因检测的心理社会障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):121-132. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00379-y. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
5
Assessing the general public's view of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing and their interpretation of DTC website disclaimer messages.评估公众对直接面向消费者(DTC)基因检测的看法以及他们对 DTC 网站免责声明信息的解读。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Aug;31(8):939-944. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01411-y. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
Implementation of a culturally competent genetic testing programme into living donor evaluation: A two-site, non-randomised, pre-post trial design.将文化能力纳入活体供者评估的基因检测项目的实施:一项两站点、非随机、前后试验设计。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 15;13(5):e067657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067657.
7
Non-genetic physicians' knowledge, attitudes and behavior towards medical genetics.非遗传科医生对医学遗传学的知识、态度和行为。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Mar;136(5-6):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02152-0. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
8
Measuring high-risk parents' opinions about direct-to-consumer genetic testing for adult-onset inherited cancer syndromes in their adolescent and young adult children.测量高危父母对其青少年和年轻成年子女进行成人发病遗传性癌症综合征的直接面向消费者的基因检测的意见。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Aug;32(4):768-777. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1685. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
A qualitative study exploring the consumer experience of receiving self-initiated polygenic risk scores from a third-party website.一项探索消费者自身从第三方网站获取多基因风险评分的体验的定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Apr;31(4):424-429. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01203-w. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
10
Genetics Adviser: a protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital platform for genetics service delivery.遗传咨询师:一项混合方法随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估一个用于遗传服务提供的数字平台。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e060899. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060899.
What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report.
具备基因组学素养意味着什么?:美国国家人类基因组研究所会议报告
Genet Med. 2013 Aug;15(8):658-63. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.14. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
4
Health literacy and 30-day postdischarge hospital utilization.健康素养与出院后 30 天内的医院利用情况。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:325-38. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.715233.
5
Lower health literacy is associated with poorer health status and outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.低健康素养与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的健康状况和预后较差有关。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):74-81. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2177-3. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
6
Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.患者对多重遗传易感性测试结果的理解和反应。
Genet Med. 2012 Jul;14(7):681-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.22.
7
Navigating a research partnership between academia and industry to assess the impact of personalized genetic testing.在学术界和产业界之间建立研究伙伴关系,以评估个性化基因检测的影响。
Genet Med. 2012 Feb;14(2):268-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.59. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
8
Health literacy explains racial disparities in diabetes medication adherence.健康素养解释了糖尿病药物治疗依从性的种族差异。
J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):268-78. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604388.
9
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.低健康素养与健康结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
10
The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests.直接面向消费者的临床基因检测的未来。
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Jun 1;12(7):511-5. doi: 10.1038/nrg3026.