Haland Trine F, Saberniak Jørg, Leren Ida S, Edvardsen Thor, Haugaa Kristina H
Center for Cardiological Innovation, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Norway; Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Center for Cardiological Innovation, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Norway.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:900-905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.162. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
Modern imaging technology has improved detection of left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) shares morphological features with LVNC, but prognosis and treatment strategies differ between LVNC and HCM.
We aimed to compare global and regional LV myocardial function in LVNC and HCM. We hypothesized that apical function is reduced in LVNC due to the embryonic reduced compaction of the apex. We studied 25 patients with LVNC (47±14years) according to current criteria, 50 with HCM (47±14years) and 50 healthy individuals (49±19years). By echocardiography, we assessed maximal wall thickness (MWT) and LV ejection fraction (EF). Numbers of trabeculations were counted from 3 apical views. Global longitudinal strain by speckle tracking echocardiography was calculated from a 16 LV segments model. LV basal (6 segments) and apical (4 segments) longitudinal strains were averaged. MWT was thinner, EF lower and trabeculations were more pronounced in LVNC compared to HCM (all p<0.001) but with no significantly differences in LV global longitudinal strain (-15.1±6.1 vs. -16.8±3.7, p=0.14). Function by longitudinal strain increased significantly from base to apex in HCM (-14.9±4.3% vs. -19.5±4.7%, p<0.001) and in healthy controls (-20.0±1.9% vs. -21.8±2.9%, p<0.001), but not in LVNC (-14.7±6.4% vs. -15.7±7.2%, p=0.35).
Increased number of trabeculations, thinner MWT and lower EF were characteristics of LVNC. Myocardial function was homogeneously reduced in LVNC, while an apical to basal gradient with relatively preserved apical function was present in HCM. These characteristics may help to discriminate between LVNC and HCM.
现代成像技术提高了左心室心肌致密化不全心肌病(LVNC)的检测率。肥厚型心肌病(HCM)与LVNC具有共同的形态学特征,但LVNC和HCM的预后及治疗策略有所不同。
我们旨在比较LVNC和HCM患者左心室整体和局部心肌功能。我们假设LVNC患者的心尖功能降低是由于胚胎期心尖致密化不全所致。我们根据当前标准研究了25例LVNC患者(47±14岁)、50例HCM患者(47±14岁)和50名健康个体(49±19岁)。通过超声心动图,我们评估了最大壁厚(MWT)和左心室射血分数(EF)。从3个心尖视图计算小梁数量。通过斑点追踪超声心动图从16节段左心室模型计算整体纵向应变。平均左心室基底(6个节段)和心尖(4个节段)纵向应变。与HCM相比,LVNC患者的MWT更薄、EF更低且小梁更明显(均p<0.001),但左心室整体纵向应变无显著差异(-15.1±6.1对-16.8±3.7,p=0.14)。在HCM患者(-14.9±4.3%对-19.5±4.7%,p<0.001)和健康对照者(-20.0±1.9%对-21.8±2.9%,p<0.001)中,纵向应变功能从基底到心尖显著增加,但在LVNC患者中未增加(-14.7±6.4%对-15.7±7.2%,p=0.35)。
小梁数量增加、MWT更薄和EF更低是LVNC的特征。LVNC患者心肌功能均匀降低,而HCM患者存在从心尖到基底的梯度,心尖功能相对保留。这些特征可能有助于鉴别LVNC和HCM。