Moss R, Zarebski A, Dawson P, McCAW J M
Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health,The University of Melbourne,Melbourne,Australia.
School of Mathematics and Statistics,The University of Melbourne,Melbourne,Australia.
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Jan;145(1):156-169. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002053. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
Accurate forecasting of seasonal influenza epidemics is of great concern to healthcare providers in temperate climates, since these epidemics vary substantially in their size, timing and duration from year to year, making it a challenge to deliver timely and proportionate responses. Previous studies have shown that Bayesian estimation techniques can accurately predict when an influenza epidemic will peak many weeks in advance, and we have previously tailored these methods for metropolitan Melbourne (Australia) and Google Flu Trends data. Here we extend these methods to clinical observation and laboratory-confirmation data for Melbourne, on the grounds that these data sources provide more accurate characterizations of influenza activity. We show that from each of these data sources we can accurately predict the timing of the epidemic peak 4-6 weeks in advance. We also show that making simultaneous use of multiple surveillance systems to improve forecast skill remains a fundamental challenge. Disparate systems provide complementary characterizations of disease activity, which may or may not be comparable, and it is unclear how a 'ground truth' for evaluating forecasts against these multiple characterizations might be defined. These findings are a significant step towards making optimal use of routine surveillance data for outbreak forecasting.
在温带气候地区,准确预测季节性流感疫情是医疗服务提供者极为关注的问题,因为这些疫情在规模、时间和持续时间上每年都有很大差异,这使得及时做出适当应对成为一项挑战。先前的研究表明,贝叶斯估计技术能够提前许多周准确预测流感疫情何时达到峰值,我们之前已针对澳大利亚墨尔本市区和谷歌流感趋势数据对这些方法进行了调整。在此,我们将这些方法扩展至墨尔本的临床观察和实验室确诊数据,因为这些数据源能更准确地描述流感活动情况。我们表明,从这些数据源中的每一个,我们都能提前4 - 6周准确预测疫情峰值的时间。我们还表明,同时使用多个监测系统以提高预测技能仍然是一个根本挑战。不同的系统提供了疾病活动的互补性描述,这些描述可能可比,也可能不可比,而且尚不清楚如何针对这些多种描述来定义用于评估预测的“地面真值”。这些发现朝着最佳利用常规监测数据进行疫情预测迈出了重要一步。