• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型一次性使用软性输尿管镜(LithoVue™)的首次临床评估:一项欧洲前瞻性多中心可行性研究。

First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study.

作者信息

Doizi Steeve, Kamphuis Guido, Giusti Guido, Andreassen Kim Hovgaard, Knoll Thomas, Osther Palle Jörn, Scoffone Cesare, Pérez-Fentes Daniel, Proietti Silvia, Wiseman Oliver, de la Rosette Jean, Traxer Olivier

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):809-818. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x
PMID:27671898
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated a new digital single-use flexible ureteroscope, LithoVue™ with respect to deflection, image quality and maneuverability.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in eight tertiary reference centers in Europe in December 2015 and January 2016. All consecutive patients included underwent flexible ureteroscopy and were 18 years or older. Deflection and image quality pre- and post-use and maneuverability were rated with a Likert scale.

RESULTS

A total of 40 procedures were performed (five per institution). The indication for FURS was treatment of renal stones in 92.5 % of the cases. Before LithoVue™ usage, the median measured upward and downward deflections were both 270°. Image quality was rated as "very good" in 65 % of cases and "good" in 30 %. Maneuverability was "very good" in 77.5 % and "good" in 17.5 %. At the final evaluation, median upward and downward deflections were both 270°. Image quality was still "very good" in 65 % of cases and "good" in 30 % with no significant difference compared with preoperative data (p = 1). Maneuverability was "very good" in 72.5 % and "good" in 17.5 %, with no significant difference compared with preoperative data (p = 0.92). Two LithoVue™ broke during surgery (5 %): one occurring in extreme deflection with acute infundibulopelvic angle and spontaneous loss of vision for the second one.

CONCLUSION

The LithoVue™ displayed good image quality, active deflection and maneuverability. Further evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis will help to present the best utility of this single-use FURS in current practice.

摘要

引言

我们对一款新型一次性使用的软性输尿管镜LithoVue™的偏转、图像质量和可操作性进行了评估。

方法

2015年12月至2016年1月在欧洲的八个三级参考中心进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。所有纳入的连续患者均接受了软性输尿管镜检查,年龄在18岁及以上。使用前和使用后的偏转及图像质量以及可操作性采用李克特量表进行评分。

结果

共进行了40例手术(每个机构5例)。92.5%的软性输尿管镜碎石术(FURS)病例的适应证为肾结石治疗。在使用LithoVue™之前,测量的向上和向下偏转的中位数均为270°。65%的病例图像质量被评为“非常好”,30%被评为“好”。77.5%的可操作性被评为“非常好”,17.5%被评为“好”。在最终评估时,向上和向下偏转的中位数均为270°。65%的病例图像质量仍为“非常好”,30%为“好”,与术前数据相比无显著差异(p = 1)。72.5%的可操作性为“非常好”,17.5%为“好”,与术前数据相比无显著差异(p = 0.92)。两台LithoVue™在手术过程中损坏(5%):一台在极度偏转且肾盂漏斗角尖锐时发生,另一台出现视力自发丧失。

结论

LithoVue™显示出良好的图像质量、主动偏转和可操作性。对手术结果的进一步评估和成本分析将有助于展现这款一次性使用的软性输尿管镜碎石术在当前实践中的最佳效用。

相似文献

1
First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study.新型一次性使用软性输尿管镜(LithoVue™)的首次临床评估:一项欧洲前瞻性多中心可行性研究。
World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):809-818. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
2
Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.单中心可重复使用软性输尿管肾镜项目的回顾性成本分析:一次性软性输尿管肾镜作为替代方案的成本比较模拟
J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1226-1230. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0427. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
3
Evaluation of a new disposable flexible ureterorenoscope and comparison to an established disposable flexible ureterorenoscope: a prospective, observational study.一种新型一次性软性输尿管镜的评估,并与一种已建立的一次性软性输尿管镜进行比较:一项前瞻性、观察性研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 May;53(5):875-881. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02727-0. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
4
First clinical evaluation of a flexible digital ureteroscope with direct in scope suctioning system (Pusen DISS 7.5Ch): prospective multicentric feasibility study.首款具有直接镜内抽吸系统的软性数字输尿管镜(Pusen DISS 7.5Ch)的首次临床评估:前瞻性多中心可行性研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 3;42(1):560. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05275-9.
5
Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.一次性使用数码输尿管软镜:一项离体评估和成本分析。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:55-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.14235.
6
WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study.WiScope® 一次性使用数字软性输尿管镜与可重复使用软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石的前瞻性随机研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Sep;40(9):2323-2330. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04095-z. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
7
The application of a single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope for the management of upper urinary calculi.一次性使用的纤维光学软性输尿管镜在上尿路结石治疗中的应用。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jul;50(7):1235-1241. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1895-9. Epub 2018 May 24.
8
Re: First Clinical Evaluation of a New Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope (LithoVue™): A European Prospective Multicentric Feasibility Study.关于:新型一次性使用软性输尿管镜(LithoVue™)的首次临床评估:一项欧洲前瞻性多中心可行性研究
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):737. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.036. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
9
Benchtop Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.新型一次性使用软性输尿管镜的台架评估。
J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):755-760. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0836. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
10
Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗肾结石的效果:数字输尿管镜与传统输尿管镜的比较。
Urology. 2013 Nov;82(5):1017-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of 6. 3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope versus 7. 5Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones < 1. 5 cm: a randomized controlled trial.6.3Fr一次性数字柔性输尿管镜与7.5Fr一次性数字柔性输尿管镜治疗直径<1.5 cm上尿路结石的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 23;43(1):384. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05751-w.
2
Relocation of big stone fragments with direct-in scope suction.使用直视镜下吸引技术重新定位大的结石碎片。
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 3;43(1):210. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05594-5.
3
Assessment of the economic relevance of the use of single-use digital flexible ureteroscopes A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.软性输尿管镜维修的成本分析:基于社区医疗实践的655例手术评估
J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):254-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0642. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
2
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
3
Comparing the Efficacy of a Multimodular Flexible Ureteroscope With Its Conventional Counterpart in the Management of Renal Stones.
一次性使用数字柔性输尿管镜使用的经济相关性评估:一项系统评价
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Dec;18(12):425-432. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8798.
4
Illumination matters part I: comparative analysis of light sources and illumination in flexible ureteroscopy-fundamental findings from a PEARLS analysis.照明很重要:软性输尿管镜检查中光源和照明的比较分析——PEARLS 分析的基本发现。
World J Urol. 2024 May 26;42(1):355. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05037-7.
5
Illumination matters part IV: blackout and whiteout in flexible ureteroscopy - first report on a phenomenon observed by PEARLS.照明的重要性第四部分:软性输尿管镜检查中的盲区和全盲区——PEARLS 观察到的一种现象的首次报告。
World J Urol. 2024 May 5;42(1):294. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04988-1.
6
Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Difficult Is It Today to Stay Up to Date? A Pictorial Review of Instruments Available in Europe in 2023.一次性使用软性输尿管镜:如今跟上最新技术有多难?2023年欧洲可用器械的图文综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 13;12(24):7648. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247648.
7
Initial experience of comparison between two slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscopes: Indoscope Sleek (Bioradmedisys™) Versus Uscope PU3033A (Pusen™): A single-center prospective study.两种最细的一次性使用软性输尿管镜对比的初步经验:Indoscope Sleek(Bioradmedisys™)与Uscope PU3033A(普申™):一项单中心前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2817-2821. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04532-7. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
8
Ureterolithiasis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Patients Treated with Single-Use Ureteroscope: A Case Report.人类免疫缺陷病毒 (HIV) 患者单次使用输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石:病例报告。
Am J Case Rep. 2022 Dec 26;23:e938608. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.938608.
9
Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review.混合式软性输尿管镜术在肾结石治疗中的应用策略——一篇叙述性综述。
J Med Life. 2022 Aug;15(8):919-926. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0110.
10
Safety and feasibility of single use cholecystoscopy for guiding laser or mechanical cholelithotripsy, and mechanical cholelithotomy.单次使用胆囊镜引导激光或机械碎石术以及机械取石术的安全性和可行性。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Jul;28(4):352-358. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20810.
比较多模块软性输尿管镜与其传统同类产品在肾结石治疗中的疗效。
Urology. 2015 Aug;86(2):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
4
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Flexible Digital Ureteroscopes: ACMI/Olympus Invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V.比较两种软性电子输尿管镜的前瞻性随机试验:ACMI/奥林巴斯Invisio DUR-D和奥林巴斯URF-V。
Urology. 2015 Jun;85(6):1267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
5
The effect of repair costs on the profitability of a ureteroscopy program.修复成本对输尿管镜检查项目盈利能力的影响。
J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):406-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0435. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
6
Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons.在一个拥有多位外科医生的大型公立三级护理中心,对翻新的软性输尿管镜的耐用性进行前瞻性评估。
Urology. 2014 Jul;84(1):42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
Improved durability of flex-Xc digital flexible ureteroscope: how long can you expect it to last?Flex-Xc 数字输尿管软镜的耐用性提高:您预计它能使用多久?
Urology. 2014 Jul;84(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.021. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
8
A 21st century nosocomial issue with endoscopes.21世纪与内窥镜相关的医院感染问题。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 19;348:g2047. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2047.
9
Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.输尿管镜激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的成本效益比较。
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):639-43. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0669. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
10
The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.腔内泌尿外科学会临床研究办公室:11885 例患者的输尿管镜检查的适应证、并发症和结局。
J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):131-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0436. Epub 2013 Dec 17.