Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH , USA.
Front Public Health. 2016 Sep 12;4:165. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00165. eCollection 2016.
A critical public health objective is to optimize and disseminate self-management interventions for the 56.7 million adults living with chronic disabling conditions in the United States. A possible strategy to optimize the effectiveness of self-management interventions is to understand how best to tailor self-management interventions to the needs and circumstances of each participant. Thus, the purpose of this scoping review was to describe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tailored self-management interventions in adults with neurological and musculoskeletal conditions that characteristically result in mobility impairments. The 13 RCTs included in the scoping review typically compared tailored interventions to non-tailored interventions or usual care among adults with chronic pain, stroke, and/or arthritis. The tailored interventions were diverse in their delivery formats, dosing, behavior change techniques, and tailoring strategies. We identified 13 personal characteristics (e.g., preferences and theoretical constructs) and 4 types of assessment formats (i.e., oral history, self-report questionnaires, provider-reported assessments, and medical records) that were used to tailor the self-management interventions. It was common to tailor intervention content using self-report questionnaires that assessed personal characteristics pertaining to impairments and preferences. Content was matched to personal characteristics using clinical judgment or computer algorithms. However, few studies adequately described the decision rules for matching content. To advance the science of tailoring self-management interventions, we recommend conducting comparative effectiveness research and further developing a taxonomy to standardize descriptions of tailoring. We discuss the opportunities that are now coalescing to optimize tailored self-management. We also provide examples of how to merge concepts from the self-management literature with conceptual frameworks of tailoring from the health communication literature.
优化和传播针对美国 5670 万患有慢性致残性疾病的成年人的自我管理干预措施是一项关键的公共卫生目标。优化自我管理干预措施效果的一种可能策略是了解如何根据每个参与者的需求和情况来最佳定制自我管理干预措施。因此,本范围综述的目的是描述针对患有神经和肌肉骨骼疾病且通常导致活动障碍的成年人的定制自我管理干预措施的随机对照试验 (RCT)。该范围综述中纳入的 13 项 RCT 通常将定制干预措施与慢性疼痛、中风和/或关节炎成年人的非定制干预措施或常规护理进行比较。定制干预措施在其交付格式、剂量、行为改变技术和定制策略方面存在差异。我们确定了 13 种个人特征(例如,偏好和理论结构)和 4 种评估格式(即口述历史、自我报告问卷、提供者报告的评估和医疗记录),用于定制自我管理干预措施。使用自我报告问卷评估与损伤和偏好相关的个人特征来定制干预内容是很常见的。使用临床判断或计算机算法将内容与个人特征匹配。然而,很少有研究充分描述了匹配内容的决策规则。为了推进定制自我管理干预措施的科学,我们建议开展比较有效性研究,并进一步开发一个分类法来标准化对定制的描述。我们讨论了现在正在聚集的优化定制自我管理的机会。我们还提供了如何将自我管理文献中的概念与健康传播文献中的定制概念框架融合的示例。