• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
24 hour ambulatory oesophageal motility monitoring: how should motility data be analysed?24小时动态食管动力监测:动力数据应如何分析?
Gut. 1989 Aug;30(8):1040-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.8.1040.
2
Temporal relationships between episodes of non-cardiac chest pain and abnormal oesophageal function.非心源性胸痛发作与食管功能异常之间的时间关系。
Gut. 1994 Jun;35(6):733-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.6.733.
3
Oesophageal motility, luminal pH, and electrocardiographic-ST segment analysis during spontaneous episodes of angina like chest pain.在类似心绞痛的胸痛自发发作期间的食管动力、管腔pH值及心电图ST段分析。
Gut. 1992 Jan;33(1):79-86. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.1.79.
4
Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring.
Gastroenterology. 1988 Apr;94(4):878-86.
5
Ambulatory 24 hour intraoesophageal pH and pressure recordings v provocation tests in the diagnosis of chest pain of oesophageal origin.动态24小时食管pH值和压力记录与激发试验在食管源性胸痛诊断中的应用
Gut. 1990 Jul;31(7):738-44. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.7.738.
6
Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry and pH-metry in patients with noncardiac chest pain, but no reflux symptoms.非心源性胸痛但无反流症状患者的动态24小时食管测压和pH值测定
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1997 May;13(5):293-300.
7
Oesophageal motility and gastro-oesophageal reflux before and after healing of reflux oesophagitis. A study using 24 hour ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring.反流性食管炎愈合前后的食管动力和胃食管反流。一项使用24小时动态pH和压力监测的研究。
Gut. 1994 Nov;35(11):1519-22. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.11.1519.
8
Ambulatory oesophageal pressure, pH and ECG recording in patients with normal and pathological coronary angiography and intermittent chest pain.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1995 Mar;7(1):23-30.
9
Analysis of 24-h oesophageal pH and pressure recordings.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Dec;7(12):1147-51. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199512000-00004.
10
Ambulatory oesophageal manometry and pH monitoring for investigation of chest pain: a New Zealand experience.动态食管测压和pH监测用于胸痛调查:新西兰的经验。
N Z Med J. 2006 Mar 10;119(1230):U1877.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH and motility monitoring in noncardiac chest pain: report of 90 patients and review of the literature.动态24小时食管pH值和动力监测在非心源性胸痛中的应用:90例患者报告及文献综述
Dig Dis Sci. 2003 May;48(5):952-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1023011931955.
2
How long should a long-term esophageal motility study be?长期食管动力研究应该持续多长时间?
Dig Dis Sci. 2001 Jun;46(6):1186-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1010694725096.
3
Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common cause of noncardiac chest pain in a country with a low prevalence of reflux esophagitis.在反流性食管炎患病率较低的国家,胃食管反流病是非心源性胸痛的常见病因。
Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Sep;43(9):1991-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1018842811123.
4
Oesophageal motor response to reflux is not impaired in reflux oesophagitis.反流性食管炎患者食管对反流的运动反应未受损。
Gut. 1993 Mar;34(3):317-20. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.317.
5
Clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in patients with primary esophageal motor disorders.
Dysphagia. 1993;8(2):105-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02266989.
6
Indications, technique, and clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in a surgical practice.外科实践中动态24小时食管动力监测的适应症、技术及临床应用
Ann Surg. 1993 Feb;217(2):128-37. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199302000-00006.
7
Does diet affect values obtained during prolonged ambulatory pressure monitoring.饮食是否会影响长时间动态血压监测所获得的值?
Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Feb;38(2):225-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01307539.
8
What is the optimal time window in symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data?24小时食管压力和pH值数据症状分析的最佳时间窗是什么?
Dig Dis Sci. 1994 Feb;39(2):402-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02090215.
9
Long-term esophageal manometry in healthy subjects. Evaluation of normal values and influence of age.健康受试者的长期食管测压。正常值评估及年龄的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 1994 Oct;39(10):2069-73. doi: 10.1007/BF02090352.
10
Transition from nutcracker esophagus to achalasia.从胡桃夹食管转变为贲门失弛缓症。
Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Sep;35(9):1162-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01537590.

本文引用的文献

1
A clinical test for esophagitis.一项食管炎的临床检测。
Gastroenterology. 1958 May;34(5):760-81.
2
Contraction abnormalities of the esophageal body in patients referred to manometry. A new approach to manometric classification.接受食管测压检查患者的食管体部收缩异常。测压分类的一种新方法。
Dig Dis Sci. 1983 Sep;28(9):784-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01296900.
3
Manometric findings during spontaneous chest pain in patients with presumed esophageal "spasms".疑似食管“痉挛”患者自发性胸痛期间的测压结果。
Gastroenterology. 1983 Aug;85(2):395-402.
4
Psychiatric illness and contraction abnormalities of the esophagus.精神疾病与食管收缩异常。
N Engl J Med. 1983 Dec 1;309(22):1337-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198312013092201.
5
A comparison between primary esophageal peristalsis following wet and dry swallows.湿吞咽和干吞咽后原发性食管蠕动的比较。
J Appl Physiol. 1973 Dec;35(6):851-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.6.851.
6
Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.食管远端24小时pH监测。胃食管反流的定量检测方法。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1974 Oct;62(4):325-32.
7
24-hour ambulatory manometry in diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders causing chest pain.24小时动态测压在诊断引起胸痛的食管运动障碍中的应用
South Med J. 1985 Jul;78(7):810-3. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198507000-00010.
8
Edrophonium: a useful provocative test for esophageal chest pain.依酚氯铵:一种用于诊断食管性胸痛的有效激发试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1985 Jul;103(1):14-21. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-1-14.
9
Psychological comparison of patients with nutcracker esophagus and irritable bowel syndrome.
Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Feb;31(2):131-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01300697.
10
Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.非心源性胸痛或吞咽困难患者的食管检测。1161例患者三年的经验结果。
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr;106(4):593-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-593.

24小时动态食管动力监测:动力数据应如何分析?

24 hour ambulatory oesophageal motility monitoring: how should motility data be analysed?

作者信息

Richter J E, Castell D O

机构信息

Gastroenterology Section, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104.

出版信息

Gut. 1989 Aug;30(8):1040-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.8.1040.

DOI:10.1136/gut.30.8.1040
PMID:2767498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1434182/
Abstract

Ambulatory oesophageal motility/pH monitoring permits accurate detection of oesophageal events during spontaneous chest pain episodes. Opinions differ, however, about the methods to review the extensive motility data and the definition of abnormal motility changes. We studied 30 patients (18 women, age 46 years) with suspected oesophageal chest pain using a portable recording system attached to a 4.5 mm catheter with pressure transducers 3 and 8 cm and pH probe 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS). An event marker was triggered by the patient for chest pain. In the patient's diary, pain was recorded on a scale of increasing severity 1-10. Two methods of analysis were used to assess 24 hour motility data. The 24 hour technique sampled five minute asymptomatic baselines throughout the study to define the patient's normal range of oesophageal motility. The second technique used only the 10 minute period immediately before each chest pain episode as the asymptomatic baseline. Chest pain episodes were defined as abnormal if associated with pH less than 4 or motility changes not present during the asymptomatic baseline analysis: 135 chest pain episodes were recorded. The method of motility analysis significantly (p less than 0.01) changed the number of chest pain episodes associated with abnormal motility: 24 hour technique - 14 episodes (10%) versus a 2.5-fold increase with the 10 minute baseline technique - 33 episodes (24%). Acid related pain episodes were similar in both groups - 13%. The majority of chest pain episodes had no association with abnormal motility or acid reflux. Increasing chest pain severity was inversely correlated with the presence of abnormal oesophageal events. We conclude that limited analysis of 24 hour motility data may over diagnose motility related chest pain events and lead to inappropriate medical or surgical therapy.

摘要

动态食管动力/pH监测可在自发性胸痛发作期间准确检测食管事件。然而,对于如何解读大量的动力数据以及异常动力变化的定义,目前存在不同观点。我们使用一个便携式记录系统对30例疑似食管源性胸痛患者(18名女性,年龄46岁)进行了研究,该记录系统连接在一根4.5毫米的导管上,导管上有位于食管下括约肌(LOS)上方3厘米和8厘米处的压力传感器以及5厘米处的pH探头。患者胸痛时触发事件标记。在患者日记中,疼痛按1 - 10的严重程度递增等级记录。采用两种分析方法评估24小时动力数据。24小时技术在整个研究过程中抽取5分钟的无症状基线数据,以确定患者食管动力的正常范围。第二种技术仅将每次胸痛发作前紧挨着的10分钟时间段作为无症状基线。如果胸痛发作伴有pH值低于4或无症状基线分析时不存在的动力变化,则定义为异常:共记录到135次胸痛发作。动力分析方法显著(p < 0.01)改变了与异常动力相关的胸痛发作次数:24小时技术 - 14次发作(10%),而10分钟基线技术则增加了2.5倍 - 33次发作(24%)。两组中与酸相关的疼痛发作相似 - 均为13%。大多数胸痛发作与异常动力或酸反流无关。胸痛严重程度增加与异常食管事件的存在呈负相关。我们得出结论,对24小时动力数据进行有限分析可能会过度诊断与动力相关的胸痛事件,并导致不适当的药物或手术治疗。