Bakkour Akram, Lewis-Peacock Jarrod A, Poldrack Russell A, Schonberg Tom
Imaging Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 100 E 24th St, Stop R9975, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, 100 E 24th St, Stop C7000, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Imaging Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 100 E 24th St, Stop R9975, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, 100 E 24th St, Stop C7000, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 108 E Dean Keeton, Stop A8000, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Neuroimage. 2017 May 1;151:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.059. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
Biasing choices may prove a useful way to implement behavior change. Previous work has shown that a simple training task (the cue-approach task), which does not rely on external reinforcement, can robustly influence choice behavior by biasing choice toward items that were targeted during training. In the current study, we replicate previous behavioral findings and explore the neural mechanisms underlying the shift in preferences following cue-approach training. Given recent successes in the development and application of machine learning techniques to task-based fMRI data, which have advanced understanding of the neural substrates of cognition, we sought to leverage the power of these techniques to better understand neural changes during cue-approach training that subsequently led to a shift in choice behavior. Contrary to our expectations, we found that machine learning techniques applied to fMRI data during non-reinforced training were unsuccessful in elucidating the neural mechanism underlying the behavioral effect. However, univariate analyses during training revealed that the relationship between BOLD and choices for Go items increases as training progresses compared to choices of NoGo items primarily in lateral prefrontal cortical areas. This new imaging finding suggests that preferences are shifted via differential engagement of task control networks that interact with value networks during cue-approach training.
偏向性选择可能是实现行为改变的一种有用方法。先前的研究表明,一种简单的训练任务(线索趋近任务),不依赖外部强化,通过使选择偏向训练期间目标指向的项目,能够有力地影响选择行为。在当前研究中,我们重复了先前的行为学发现,并探究线索趋近训练后偏好转变背后的神经机制。鉴于最近在将机器学习技术开发和应用于基于任务的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据方面取得的成功,这些成功推进了对认知神经基础的理解,我们试图利用这些技术的力量,以更好地理解线索趋近训练期间随后导致选择行为转变的神经变化。与我们的预期相反,我们发现,在无强化训练期间应用于fMRI数据的机器学习技术未能成功阐明行为效应背后的神经机制。然而,训练期间的单变量分析显示,与主要在外侧前额叶皮质区域对“否”项目的选择相比,随着训练的进行,“是”项目的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号与选择之间的关系增加。这一新的成像发现表明,在线索趋近训练期间,偏好是通过与价值网络相互作用的任务控制网络的差异参与而发生转变的。