Inglés Cándido J, García-Fernández José Manuel, Vicent María, Gonzálvez Carolina, Sanmartín Ricardo
Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche Elche, Spain.
Department of Developmental Psychology and Didactics, University of Alicante Alicante, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 14;7:1403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01403. eCollection 2016.
The 2 × 2 model of dispositional perfectionism has been very well received by researchers of the topic, leading to the creation of new studies that have analyzed the way in which the four proposed subtypes are distinctly associated with measures of adaptation and maladjustment. The goal of this study was to determine the possible existence of four profiles of child perfectionism that are congruent with the subtypes proposed by the 2 × 2 model, and whether these subtypes are associated with school anxiety, in accordance with the hypotheses established by the model. The sample was composed of 2157 students from Spanish Primary Education aged between 8 and 11 years (M = 9.60, SD = 1.24). The Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale was used to assess Socially Prescribed Perfectionism and Self-Oriented Perfectionism, and the School Anxiety Inventory for Primary Education was used to measure school anxiety. The results of cluster analysis identified four differential groups of perfectionists similar to the subtypes defined by the 2 × 2 model: Non-Perfectionism, Pure Personal Standards Perfectionism (Pure PSP), Pure Evaluative Concerns Perfectionism (Pure ECP), and Mixed Perfectionism. The four groups presented a differentiable pattern of association with school anxiety, with the exception of Pure PSP and Pure ECP, which showed no significant differences. Participants classified as Non-perfectionists presented the most adaptive outcomes, whereas subjects included in the Mixed Perfectionism group scored significantly higher on school anxiety than the three remaining groups. To conclude, the results partially supported the hypotheses of the 2 × 2 model, questioning the consideration of Self-Oriented Perfectionism as a positive manifestation of perfectionism and showing that it is the combination of high scores in both perfectionist dimensions, Self-Oriented Perfectionism and Socially Prescribed Perfectionism that implies higher levels of school anxiety. These findings should be taken into account when generalizing the 2 × 2 model to child population.
特质完美主义的2×2模型受到了该主题研究者的广泛欢迎,促使人们开展新的研究,分析所提出的四种亚型与适应和适应不良测量指标之间的独特关联方式。本研究的目的是确定与2×2模型所提出的亚型相一致的四种儿童完美主义特征是否可能存在,以及根据该模型所确立的假设,这些亚型是否与学校焦虑相关。样本由2157名8至11岁的西班牙小学教育阶段学生组成(M = 9.60,SD = 1.24)。使用儿童与青少年完美主义量表评估社会规定完美主义和自我导向完美主义,并使用小学教育学校焦虑量表测量学校焦虑。聚类分析结果确定了四个不同的完美主义者群体,类似于2×2模型定义的亚型:非完美主义、纯粹个人标准完美主义(纯粹PSP)、纯粹评价关注完美主义(纯粹ECP)和混合完美主义。除了纯粹PSP和纯粹ECP没有显著差异外,这四个群体呈现出与学校焦虑不同的关联模式。被归类为非完美主义者的参与者表现出最具适应性的结果,而混合完美主义组的受试者在学校焦虑方面的得分显著高于其他三个组。总之,研究结果部分支持了2×2模型的假设,对将自我导向完美主义视为完美主义的积极表现提出了质疑,并表明正是自我导向完美主义和社会规定完美主义这两个完美主义维度的高分组合意味着更高水平的学校焦虑。在将2×2模型推广到儿童群体时应考虑这些发现。