Diagnostic validity of physical examination tests for common knee disorders: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION

More evidence on diagnostic validity of physical examination tests for knee disorders is needed to lower frequently used and costly imaging tests.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) evaluating the diagnostic validity of physical examination tests for knee disorders.

METHODS

A structured literature search was conducted in five databases until January 2016. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR.

RESULTS

Seventeen reviews were included with mean AMSTAR score of 5.5 ± 2.3. Based on six SR, only the Lachman test for ACL injuries is diagnostically valid when individually performed (Likelihood ratio (LR+):10.2, LR-:0.2). Based on two SR, the Ottawa Knee Rule is a valid screening tool for knee fractures (LR-:0.05). Based on one SR, the EULAR criteria had a post-test probability of 99% for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Based on two SR, a complete physical examination performed by a trained health provider was found to be diagnostically valid for ACL, PCL and meniscal injuries as well as for cartilage lesions.

CONCLUSION

When individually performed, common physical tests are rarely able to rule in or rule out a specific knee disorder, except the Lachman for ACL injuries. There is low-quality evidence concerning the validity of combining history elements and physical tests.