• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Estimating 1-Year Mortality for High-Risk Primary Care Patients Using the "Surprise" Question.

作者信息

Lakin Joshua R, Robinson Margaret G, Bernacki Rachelle E, Powers Brian W, Block Susan D, Cunningham Rebecca, Obermeyer Ziad

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts2Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1863-1865. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5928.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5928
PMID:27695853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5755589/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Estimating 1-Year Mortality for High-Risk Primary Care Patients Using the "Surprise" Question.使用“意外”问题评估高危初级保健患者的1年死亡率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1863-1865. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5928.
2
Prioritizing Primary Care Patients for a Communication Intervention Using the "Surprise Question": a Prospective Cohort Study.利用“意外问题”为初级保健患者优先安排沟通干预措施：一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1467-1474. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05094-4. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
3
Evaluation of the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS-OB) in critically ill obstetric patients.危重症产科患者简化急性生理学评分（SAPS-OB）的评估
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug;37(6):799-800. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1299699. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Independent validation of the modified prognosis palliative care study predictor models in three palliative care settings.改良预后姑息治疗研究预测模型在三种姑息治疗环境中的独立验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):853-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
5
A systematic review of prognostic tools for estimating survival time in palliative care.一项关于姑息治疗中估计生存时间的预后工具的系统评价。
J Palliat Care. 2007 Summer;23(2):93-112.
6
Surprise Questions for Survival Prediction in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.晚期癌症患者生存预测的意外问题：一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Oncologist. 2015 Jul;20(7):839-44. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0015. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
7
Screening with the double surprise question to predict deterioration and death: an explorative study.双重意外问题筛查预测恶化和死亡：一项探索性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Dec 27;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0503-9.
8
Predicting one-year mortality in heart failure using the 'Surprise Question': a prospective pilot study.使用“Surprise Question”预测心力衰竭患者一年死亡率：一项前瞻性试点研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;21(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1353. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Utility of the "Surprise" Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions.“意外”问题在预测老年急性外科疾病患者生存率中的效用
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):420-423. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0313. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Development of the ProPal-COPD tool to identify patients with COPD for proactive palliative care.开发ProPal-COPD工具以识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）患者，以便进行积极的姑息治疗。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jul 20;12:2121-2128. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S140037. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
The 'Surprise' Question in Haemato-Oncology: The Estimating Physician and Time to Death Reduce the Prognostic Uncertainty-An Observational Study.血液肿瘤学中的“意外”问题：评估医生与死亡时间可降低预后不确定性——一项观察性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1326. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081326.
2
In-Hospital Death of Patients with Known Life-Threatening Disease: A Retrospective Analysis.患有已知危及生命疾病患者的院内死亡：一项回顾性分析。
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Nov 27;5(1):521-526. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0051. eCollection 2024.
3
Global trends in machine learning applied to clinical research in liver cancer: Bibliometric and visualization analysis (2001-2024).应用于肝癌临床研究的机器学习全球趋势：文献计量与可视化分析（2001 - 2024年）
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 6;103(49):e40790. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040790.
4
How Good Are Cardiologists at Predicting Major Adverse Events in Fontan Patients?心脏病专家预测Fontan手术患者主要不良事件的能力如何？
JACC Adv. 2023 Nov 24;3(1):100736. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100736. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.意外问题与临床医生预测的预后：系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
6
A comparison of palliative care and rapid emergency screening (P-CaRES) tool, broad and narrow criteria, and surprise questions to predict survival of older emergency department patients.姑息治疗与快速紧急筛查（P-CaRES）工具、广泛和狭义标准以及意外问题在预测老年急诊科患者生存方面的比较。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 27;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01205-5.
7
Machine Learning for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis.机器学习在肺癌诊断、治疗和预后中的应用。
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2022 Oct;20(5):850-866. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
8
The utility of the surprise question: A useful tool for identifying patients nearing the last phase of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“惊讶问题”的实用性：识别生命末期患者的有用工具？系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;36(7):1023-1046. doi: 10.1177/02692163221099116.
9
Health care professionals' perceptions of factors influencing the process of identifying patients for serious illness conversations: A qualitative study.卫生保健专业人员对影响识别重症患者谈话过程的因素的看法：一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;36(7):1072-1079. doi: 10.1177/02692163221102266. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
10
Video Images about Decisions for Ethical Outcomes in Kidney Disease (VIDEO-KD): the study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.关于肾脏病伦理结局决策的视频图像（VIDEO-KD）：一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e059313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059313.

本文引用的文献

1
The 'surprise' question in advanced cancer patients: A prospective study among general practitioners.晚期癌症患者的“意外”问题：全科医生的一项前瞻性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):959-964. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526273. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
2
Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.解读风险预测模型中新增标志物的增量价值。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Sep 15;176(6):473-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws207. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
3
A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores.联合合并症评分预测老年患者死亡率优于现有评分。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;64(7):749-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.004. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
4
Utility of the "surprise" question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality.“意外”问题在识别高死亡率透析患者中的效用。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Sep;3(5):1379-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00940208. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
5
Improving Care Through the End of Life: launching a primary care clinic-based program.通过生命末期改善护理：启动一项基于初级保健诊所的项目。
J Palliat Med. 2001 Summer;4(2):249-54. doi: 10.1089/109662101750290335.