• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自动神经牵开器与神经钩的显微内镜下椎间盘切除术的安全性和效率比较。

Comparison of safety and efficiency of microendoscopic discectomy with automatic nerve retractor and with nerve hook.

作者信息

Yin He-Ping, Wang Yu-Peng, Qiu Zhi-Ye, Du Zhi-Cai, Wu Yi-Min, Li Shu-Wen

机构信息

The Second Affiliated Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010030, China.

出版信息

Regen Biomater. 2016 Oct;3(5):319-322. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbw029. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1093/rb/rbw029
PMID:27699062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5043153/
Abstract

This study compares the safety and efficiency of two techniques in microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc herniation. The two techniques are MED with automatic nerve retractor and MED with nerve hook which had been widely used for many years. The former involves a newly developed MED device which contains three parts to protect nerve roots during operation. Four hundred and twenty-eight patients underwent MED treatments between October 2010 and September 2015 were recruited and randomized to either intraoperative utilization of automatic nerve retractor ( = 315, group A) or application of nerve hook during surgery ( = 113, group B). Operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume were evaluated. Simultaneously, Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and muscle strength grading were performed preoperatively, and 1, 2, 3 days, 1, 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No dramatic difference of pain intensity was observed between the two groups before surgery and 6 months after surgery ( > 0.05). The operation time was shorter in group A (30.30 ± 1.89 min) than that in group B (59.41 ± 3.25 min). Group A (67.83 ± 13.14 ml) experienced a significant decrease in the amount of blood loss volume when compared with group B (100.04 ± 15.10 ml). There were remarkable differences of VAS score and muscle strength grading after postoperative 1, 2, 3 days, 1, 2 weeks and 3 months between both groups ( ≤ 0.05). MED with automatic nerve retractor effectively shortened operation time, decreased the amount of bleeding, down-regulated the incidence of nerve traction injury.

摘要

本研究比较了两种技术在腰椎间盘突出症显微内镜下椎间盘切除术(MED)中的安全性和有效性。这两种技术分别是使用自动神经牵开器的MED和已广泛使用多年的神经钩辅助MED。前者涉及一种新开发的MED设备,该设备包含三个部分,可在手术过程中保护神经根。选取2010年10月至2015年9月期间接受MED治疗的428例患者,随机分为术中使用自动神经牵开器组(n = 315,A组)或手术中使用神经钩组(n = 113,B组)。评估手术时间和术中出血量。同时,在术前、术后1天、2天、3天、1周、2周、3个月和6个月进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)和肌力分级。两组术前和术后6个月的疼痛强度无显著差异(P>0.05)。A组的手术时间(30.30±1.89分钟)比B组(59.41±3.25分钟)短。与B组(100.04±15.10毫升)相比,A组(67.83±13.14毫升)的失血量显著减少。两组术后1天、2天、3天、1周、2周和3个月的VAS评分和肌力分级有显著差异(P≤0.05)。使用自动神经牵开器的MED有效缩短了手术时间,减少了出血量,降低了神经牵拉损伤的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0280/5043153/756aa20b45d6/rbw029f3p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0280/5043153/4f73028a0c3f/rbw029f1p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0280/5043153/cdef347a49c6/rbw029f2p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0280/5043153/756aa20b45d6/rbw029f3p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0280/5043153/4f73028a0c3f/rbw029f1p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0280/5043153/cdef347a49c6/rbw029f2p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0280/5043153/756aa20b45d6/rbw029f3p.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of safety and efficiency of microendoscopic discectomy with automatic nerve retractor and with nerve hook.使用自动神经牵开器与神经钩的显微内镜下椎间盘切除术的安全性和效率比较。
Regen Biomater. 2016 Oct;3(5):319-322. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbw029. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
2
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation.单节段腰椎间盘突出症的显微内镜下椎间盘切除术与开放椎间盘切除术的比较
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Jul 26;8(14):2942-2949. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2942.
6
Full-Endoscopic Technique Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation.全内镜技术椎间盘切除术与显微内镜椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的对比研究
Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):359-63.
7
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar disc herniation: comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and Love's method.腰椎间盘突出症术后磁共振成像:显微内镜下椎间盘切除术与Love法的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 15;26(14):1599-605. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00022.
8
[Traumatic responses following microendoscopic discectomy: clinical analysis of 44 patients].[显微内镜下椎间盘切除术的创伤反应:44例患者的临床分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Nov 21;86(43):3039-42.
9
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Microendoscopic Discectomy.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术:显微内镜下椎间盘切除术后复发性疝的翻修手术
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.120. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
A case-control study on the treatment of protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc through PELD and MED.一项关于经皮内镜下腰椎间盘摘除术(PELD)和微创扩张通道腰椎间盘切除术(MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的病例对照研究。
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Oct;14(4):3708-3712. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4929. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a mechanical adaptable, moisture retention capable, injectable and adhesive organohydrogel for nucleus pulposus repairing.用于修复髓核的机械适应性、保湿性、可注射且具粘性的有机水凝胶的研发。
Regen Biomater. 2025 May 19;12:rbaf047. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbaf047. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Important Topics in the Future of Tissue Engineering: Comments from the participants of the 5th International Conference on Tissue Engineering at Kos, Greece.组织工程学未来的重要议题:来自于在希腊科斯岛举办的第五届国际组织工程学会议参与者的评论
Regen Biomater. 2014 Nov;1(1):103-6. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbu001. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
2
Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.腰椎微创手术
World J Clin Cases. 2015 Jan 16;3(1):1-9. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.1.
3
Clinical observation of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in treatment for sequelae of thoracolumbar spinal cord injury.
脐带间充质干细胞移植治疗胸腰段脊髓损伤后遗症的临床观察
J Transl Med. 2014 Sep 12;12:253. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0253-7.
4
The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.微创椎间盘切除术的安全性和有效性:前瞻性随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2014 Jun;38(6):1225-34. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2331-0. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
5
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes.经皮内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术:一种先进的手术技术及临床疗效
Neurosurgery. 2014 Aug;75(2):124-33; discussion 132-3. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000361.
6
Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: Technique and results of 188 cases.显微内镜下腰椎间盘切除术:188例手术技术与结果
Indian J Orthop. 2014 Jan;48(1):81-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.125511.
7
Microendoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis via the Paramedian Approach: Preliminary Results.经旁正中入路微创内窥镜下减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:初步结果。
Global Spine J. 2012 Jun;2(2):87-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1319774.
8
Comparison of one-level microendoscopy laminoforaminotomy and cervical arthroplasty in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.颈椎间盘突出症行单节段显微镜下经皮椎板间入路减压融合术与颈椎人工关节置换术的疗效比较:至少 2 年的随访研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Dec 17;8:48. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-48.
9
Comparison of outcomes between conventional lumbar fenestration discectomy and minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: an observational study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.传统腰椎开窗髓核切除术与微创腰椎间盘切除术的疗效比较:一项至少 2 年随访的观察性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Sep 24;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-34.
10
Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a technical note.经中线入路内镜辅助下管状手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:技术要点。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2105-12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2806-5. Epub 2013 May 7.