Grov Christian, Rendina H Jonathon, Jimenez Ruben, Parsons Jeffrey T
Department of Community Health and Social Science, City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York.
Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies and Training (CHEST), New York, New York.
AIDS Educ Prev. 2016 Oct;28(5):378-392. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2016.28.5.378.
Given the ongoing HIV epidemic, it is essential to identify gay and bisexual men who are interested in starting PrEP as well as active PrEP users. We report on online survey data gathered over a 17-month period in 2014-2015 from gay and bisexual men identified through six sources of recruitment (n = 2903): Facebook, a hookup website, two geosocial-sexual networking apps (herein "App 1: Pop-up ads" and "App 2: Banner ads"), and two types of listservs (one focused on general gay nightlife, and one focused on gay sex parties). Willingness to take PrEP were as follows: sex party listservs (71.3%), both apps (69.8%), Facebook (67.6%), hookup website (65.2%), and nightlife listservs (50.5%). Experience having taken PrEP was as follows: sex party listservs (23.4%), App 2: Banner ads (22.5%), nightlife listservs (17.1) Facebook (14.2%), App 1: Pop-up ads (12.4%), and hookup website (2.1%). In multivariable modeling, willingness to go on PrEP was independently associated with being younger, single, a person of color, and having been tested for HIV in the past 12 months. Source of recruitment was largely unassociated with willingness to start PrEP. Number of recent male partners, number of recent condomless anal sex (CAS) events, and when data were collected (i.e., time in months) were not significantly associated with willingness to start PrEP. In multivariable models, experience having taken PrEP was positively associated with sexual identity as gay, number of recent male sex partners, number of recent CAS acts, being tested for HIV in the past 12 months, and time (in months). Experience taking PrEP varied greatly by recruitment source, suggesting both researchers and providers might be well served to utilize digital mediums to effectively identify these individuals; however, should do so with caution as not all digital options may prove fruitful.
鉴于当前的艾滋病毒疫情,识别有兴趣开始服用暴露前预防药物(PrEP)的男同性恋者和双性恋者以及现有的PrEP使用者至关重要。我们报告了2014年至2015年期间通过六种招募来源(n = 2903)识别出的男同性恋者和双性恋者在17个月内收集的在线调查数据:脸书、一个约炮网站、两款地理社交性网络应用程序(此处称为“应用程序1:弹出式广告”和“应用程序2:横幅广告”),以及两种类型的邮件列表(一种专注于一般的同性恋夜生活,另一种专注于同性恋性派对)。服用PrEP的意愿如下:性派对邮件列表(71.3%)、两款应用程序(69.8%)、脸书(67.6%)、约炮网站(65.2%)和夜生活邮件列表(50.5%)。服用过PrEP的经历如下:性派对邮件列表(23.4%)、应用程序2:横幅广告(22.5%)、夜生活邮件列表(17.1%)、脸书(14.2%)、应用程序1:弹出式广告(12.4%)和约炮网站(2.1%)。在多变量模型中,服用PrEP的意愿与年龄较小、单身、有色人种以及在过去12个月内接受过艾滋病毒检测独立相关。招募来源在很大程度上与开始服用PrEP的意愿无关。近期男性伴侣的数量、近期无保护肛交(CAS)事件的数量以及数据收集时间(即月份)与开始服用PrEP的意愿无显著关联。在多变量模型中,服用过PrEP的经历与同性恋性取向、近期男性性伴侣的数量、近期CAS行为的数量、在过去12个月内接受过艾滋病毒检测以及时间(月份)呈正相关。服用PrEP的经历因招募来源而异,这表明研究人员和提供者可能会受益于利用数字媒介来有效识别这些个体;然而,这样做时应谨慎,因为并非所有数字选项都可能有成效。